Cargando…
Assessing health research grant applications: A retrospective comparative review of a one-stage versus a two-stage application assessment process
BACKGROUND: Research funders use a wide variety of application assessment processes yet there is little evidence on their relative advantages and disadvantages. A broad distinction can be made between processes with a single stage assessment of full proposals and those that first invite an outline,...
Autores principales: | Morgan, Ben, Yu, Ly-Mee, Solomon, Tom, Ziebland, Sue |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7067561/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32163468 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230118 |
Ejemplares similares
-
The development and application of audit criteria for assessing knowledge exchange plans in health research grant applications
por: Ruppertsberg, Alexa I, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Ranking versus rating in peer review of research grant applications
por: Tamblyn, Robyn, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Development of a standard form for assessing research grant applications from the perspective of patients
por: de Wit, Maarten, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
The Delphi process: a solution for reviewing novel grant applications
por: Holliday, Cath, et al.
Publicado: (2010) -
Demystifying the NIH Grant Application Process: The Rest of the Story
por: Horner, Ronnie D.
Publicado: (2007)