Cargando…
The Clinicopathological Risk Factors in Renal Cell Cancer for the Oncological Outcomes Following Nephron-Sparing Surgery: A PRISMA Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Background and Objectives: Published data from individual studies present conflicting evidence about the relationship between clinicopathological risk factors and oncological outcomes in renal cell cancer (RCC) following nephron-sparing surgery (NSS). This study was conducted to explore the potentia...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7067827/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32211325 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.00286 |
_version_ | 1783505463651860480 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Lijin Wu, Bin Zha, Zhenlei Qu, Wei Zhao, Hu Yuan, Jun |
author_facet | Zhang, Lijin Wu, Bin Zha, Zhenlei Qu, Wei Zhao, Hu Yuan, Jun |
author_sort | Zhang, Lijin |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background and Objectives: Published data from individual studies present conflicting evidence about the relationship between clinicopathological risk factors and oncological outcomes in renal cell cancer (RCC) following nephron-sparing surgery (NSS). This study was conducted to explore the potential risk factors for RCC progress after NSS. Methods: Studies published in PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE were systematically reviewed from inception to March 2019 to determine risk factors for RCC following NSS. The predictive ability of identified predictors was assessed by hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A fixed-effect or random-effect was used to pool the estimates. Subgroup analyses were performed to explore the source of heterogeneity. Results: Seventeen studies including 38,522 patients with RCC were analyzed. The meta-analysis indicated that positive surgical margin (pooled HR = 1.47; 95% CI:1.24–1.73; P < 0.001), higher Fuhrman grade (pooled HR = 1.58; 95% CI:1.10–2.28; P = 0.013), higher pathological stage (pooled HR = 1.72; 95% CI:1.40–2.12; P < 0.001) and large tumor size (pooled HR = 1.09; 95% CI:1.03–1.16; P = 0.003) were significantly associated with recurrence risk. However, age (pooled HR = 1.00; 95% CI: 1.00–1.01; P = 0.257), sex (male vs. female) (pooled HR = 1.04; 95% CI: 0.89–1.21; P = 0.605) and surgical approach (laparoscope vs. open) (pooled HR = 0.80; 95% CI: 0.59–1.07; P = 0.129) had no effect on recurrence after NSS. In addition, we found that positive surgical margin was significantly associated with recurrence-free survival (pooled HR = 1.87; 95% CI: 1.32–2.66; P < 0.001) and overall mortality (pooled HR = 1.15; 95% CI: 1.07–1.23; P < 0.001), as well as large tumor size for recurrence-free survival (pooled HR = 1.18; 95% CI: 1.06–1.30; P = 0.002)and overall mortality (pooled HR = 1.01; 95% CI: 1.00–1.02; P = 0.004). Conclusions: Unfavorable pathological characteristics were distinctly related to worse oncological outcomes in RCC patients following NSS. These results may contribute to proposed prediction models for RCC patients to aid in counseling and risk stratification. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7067827 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70678272020-03-24 The Clinicopathological Risk Factors in Renal Cell Cancer for the Oncological Outcomes Following Nephron-Sparing Surgery: A PRISMA Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Zhang, Lijin Wu, Bin Zha, Zhenlei Qu, Wei Zhao, Hu Yuan, Jun Front Oncol Oncology Background and Objectives: Published data from individual studies present conflicting evidence about the relationship between clinicopathological risk factors and oncological outcomes in renal cell cancer (RCC) following nephron-sparing surgery (NSS). This study was conducted to explore the potential risk factors for RCC progress after NSS. Methods: Studies published in PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE were systematically reviewed from inception to March 2019 to determine risk factors for RCC following NSS. The predictive ability of identified predictors was assessed by hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A fixed-effect or random-effect was used to pool the estimates. Subgroup analyses were performed to explore the source of heterogeneity. Results: Seventeen studies including 38,522 patients with RCC were analyzed. The meta-analysis indicated that positive surgical margin (pooled HR = 1.47; 95% CI:1.24–1.73; P < 0.001), higher Fuhrman grade (pooled HR = 1.58; 95% CI:1.10–2.28; P = 0.013), higher pathological stage (pooled HR = 1.72; 95% CI:1.40–2.12; P < 0.001) and large tumor size (pooled HR = 1.09; 95% CI:1.03–1.16; P = 0.003) were significantly associated with recurrence risk. However, age (pooled HR = 1.00; 95% CI: 1.00–1.01; P = 0.257), sex (male vs. female) (pooled HR = 1.04; 95% CI: 0.89–1.21; P = 0.605) and surgical approach (laparoscope vs. open) (pooled HR = 0.80; 95% CI: 0.59–1.07; P = 0.129) had no effect on recurrence after NSS. In addition, we found that positive surgical margin was significantly associated with recurrence-free survival (pooled HR = 1.87; 95% CI: 1.32–2.66; P < 0.001) and overall mortality (pooled HR = 1.15; 95% CI: 1.07–1.23; P < 0.001), as well as large tumor size for recurrence-free survival (pooled HR = 1.18; 95% CI: 1.06–1.30; P = 0.002)and overall mortality (pooled HR = 1.01; 95% CI: 1.00–1.02; P = 0.004). Conclusions: Unfavorable pathological characteristics were distinctly related to worse oncological outcomes in RCC patients following NSS. These results may contribute to proposed prediction models for RCC patients to aid in counseling and risk stratification. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7067827/ /pubmed/32211325 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.00286 Text en Copyright © 2020 Zhang, Wu, Zha, Qu, Zhao and Yuan. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Oncology Zhang, Lijin Wu, Bin Zha, Zhenlei Qu, Wei Zhao, Hu Yuan, Jun The Clinicopathological Risk Factors in Renal Cell Cancer for the Oncological Outcomes Following Nephron-Sparing Surgery: A PRISMA Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title | The Clinicopathological Risk Factors in Renal Cell Cancer for the Oncological Outcomes Following Nephron-Sparing Surgery: A PRISMA Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full | The Clinicopathological Risk Factors in Renal Cell Cancer for the Oncological Outcomes Following Nephron-Sparing Surgery: A PRISMA Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | The Clinicopathological Risk Factors in Renal Cell Cancer for the Oncological Outcomes Following Nephron-Sparing Surgery: A PRISMA Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | The Clinicopathological Risk Factors in Renal Cell Cancer for the Oncological Outcomes Following Nephron-Sparing Surgery: A PRISMA Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_short | The Clinicopathological Risk Factors in Renal Cell Cancer for the Oncological Outcomes Following Nephron-Sparing Surgery: A PRISMA Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | clinicopathological risk factors in renal cell cancer for the oncological outcomes following nephron-sparing surgery: a prisma systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7067827/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32211325 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.00286 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhanglijin theclinicopathologicalriskfactorsinrenalcellcancerfortheoncologicaloutcomesfollowingnephronsparingsurgeryaprismasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wubin theclinicopathologicalriskfactorsinrenalcellcancerfortheoncologicaloutcomesfollowingnephronsparingsurgeryaprismasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhazhenlei theclinicopathologicalriskfactorsinrenalcellcancerfortheoncologicaloutcomesfollowingnephronsparingsurgeryaprismasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT quwei theclinicopathologicalriskfactorsinrenalcellcancerfortheoncologicaloutcomesfollowingnephronsparingsurgeryaprismasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhaohu theclinicopathologicalriskfactorsinrenalcellcancerfortheoncologicaloutcomesfollowingnephronsparingsurgeryaprismasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT yuanjun theclinicopathologicalriskfactorsinrenalcellcancerfortheoncologicaloutcomesfollowingnephronsparingsurgeryaprismasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhanglijin clinicopathologicalriskfactorsinrenalcellcancerfortheoncologicaloutcomesfollowingnephronsparingsurgeryaprismasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wubin clinicopathologicalriskfactorsinrenalcellcancerfortheoncologicaloutcomesfollowingnephronsparingsurgeryaprismasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhazhenlei clinicopathologicalriskfactorsinrenalcellcancerfortheoncologicaloutcomesfollowingnephronsparingsurgeryaprismasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT quwei clinicopathologicalriskfactorsinrenalcellcancerfortheoncologicaloutcomesfollowingnephronsparingsurgeryaprismasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhaohu clinicopathologicalriskfactorsinrenalcellcancerfortheoncologicaloutcomesfollowingnephronsparingsurgeryaprismasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT yuanjun clinicopathologicalriskfactorsinrenalcellcancerfortheoncologicaloutcomesfollowingnephronsparingsurgeryaprismasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |