Cargando…

The Clinicopathological Risk Factors in Renal Cell Cancer for the Oncological Outcomes Following Nephron-Sparing Surgery: A PRISMA Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background and Objectives: Published data from individual studies present conflicting evidence about the relationship between clinicopathological risk factors and oncological outcomes in renal cell cancer (RCC) following nephron-sparing surgery (NSS). This study was conducted to explore the potentia...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Lijin, Wu, Bin, Zha, Zhenlei, Qu, Wei, Zhao, Hu, Yuan, Jun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7067827/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32211325
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.00286
_version_ 1783505463651860480
author Zhang, Lijin
Wu, Bin
Zha, Zhenlei
Qu, Wei
Zhao, Hu
Yuan, Jun
author_facet Zhang, Lijin
Wu, Bin
Zha, Zhenlei
Qu, Wei
Zhao, Hu
Yuan, Jun
author_sort Zhang, Lijin
collection PubMed
description Background and Objectives: Published data from individual studies present conflicting evidence about the relationship between clinicopathological risk factors and oncological outcomes in renal cell cancer (RCC) following nephron-sparing surgery (NSS). This study was conducted to explore the potential risk factors for RCC progress after NSS. Methods: Studies published in PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE were systematically reviewed from inception to March 2019 to determine risk factors for RCC following NSS. The predictive ability of identified predictors was assessed by hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A fixed-effect or random-effect was used to pool the estimates. Subgroup analyses were performed to explore the source of heterogeneity. Results: Seventeen studies including 38,522 patients with RCC were analyzed. The meta-analysis indicated that positive surgical margin (pooled HR = 1.47; 95% CI:1.24–1.73; P < 0.001), higher Fuhrman grade (pooled HR = 1.58; 95% CI:1.10–2.28; P = 0.013), higher pathological stage (pooled HR = 1.72; 95% CI:1.40–2.12; P < 0.001) and large tumor size (pooled HR = 1.09; 95% CI:1.03–1.16; P = 0.003) were significantly associated with recurrence risk. However, age (pooled HR = 1.00; 95% CI: 1.00–1.01; P = 0.257), sex (male vs. female) (pooled HR = 1.04; 95% CI: 0.89–1.21; P = 0.605) and surgical approach (laparoscope vs. open) (pooled HR = 0.80; 95% CI: 0.59–1.07; P = 0.129) had no effect on recurrence after NSS. In addition, we found that positive surgical margin was significantly associated with recurrence-free survival (pooled HR = 1.87; 95% CI: 1.32–2.66; P < 0.001) and overall mortality (pooled HR = 1.15; 95% CI: 1.07–1.23; P < 0.001), as well as large tumor size for recurrence-free survival (pooled HR = 1.18; 95% CI: 1.06–1.30; P = 0.002)and overall mortality (pooled HR = 1.01; 95% CI: 1.00–1.02; P = 0.004). Conclusions: Unfavorable pathological characteristics were distinctly related to worse oncological outcomes in RCC patients following NSS. These results may contribute to proposed prediction models for RCC patients to aid in counseling and risk stratification.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7067827
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70678272020-03-24 The Clinicopathological Risk Factors in Renal Cell Cancer for the Oncological Outcomes Following Nephron-Sparing Surgery: A PRISMA Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Zhang, Lijin Wu, Bin Zha, Zhenlei Qu, Wei Zhao, Hu Yuan, Jun Front Oncol Oncology Background and Objectives: Published data from individual studies present conflicting evidence about the relationship between clinicopathological risk factors and oncological outcomes in renal cell cancer (RCC) following nephron-sparing surgery (NSS). This study was conducted to explore the potential risk factors for RCC progress after NSS. Methods: Studies published in PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE were systematically reviewed from inception to March 2019 to determine risk factors for RCC following NSS. The predictive ability of identified predictors was assessed by hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A fixed-effect or random-effect was used to pool the estimates. Subgroup analyses were performed to explore the source of heterogeneity. Results: Seventeen studies including 38,522 patients with RCC were analyzed. The meta-analysis indicated that positive surgical margin (pooled HR = 1.47; 95% CI:1.24–1.73; P < 0.001), higher Fuhrman grade (pooled HR = 1.58; 95% CI:1.10–2.28; P = 0.013), higher pathological stage (pooled HR = 1.72; 95% CI:1.40–2.12; P < 0.001) and large tumor size (pooled HR = 1.09; 95% CI:1.03–1.16; P = 0.003) were significantly associated with recurrence risk. However, age (pooled HR = 1.00; 95% CI: 1.00–1.01; P = 0.257), sex (male vs. female) (pooled HR = 1.04; 95% CI: 0.89–1.21; P = 0.605) and surgical approach (laparoscope vs. open) (pooled HR = 0.80; 95% CI: 0.59–1.07; P = 0.129) had no effect on recurrence after NSS. In addition, we found that positive surgical margin was significantly associated with recurrence-free survival (pooled HR = 1.87; 95% CI: 1.32–2.66; P < 0.001) and overall mortality (pooled HR = 1.15; 95% CI: 1.07–1.23; P < 0.001), as well as large tumor size for recurrence-free survival (pooled HR = 1.18; 95% CI: 1.06–1.30; P = 0.002)and overall mortality (pooled HR = 1.01; 95% CI: 1.00–1.02; P = 0.004). Conclusions: Unfavorable pathological characteristics were distinctly related to worse oncological outcomes in RCC patients following NSS. These results may contribute to proposed prediction models for RCC patients to aid in counseling and risk stratification. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7067827/ /pubmed/32211325 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.00286 Text en Copyright © 2020 Zhang, Wu, Zha, Qu, Zhao and Yuan. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Zhang, Lijin
Wu, Bin
Zha, Zhenlei
Qu, Wei
Zhao, Hu
Yuan, Jun
The Clinicopathological Risk Factors in Renal Cell Cancer for the Oncological Outcomes Following Nephron-Sparing Surgery: A PRISMA Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title The Clinicopathological Risk Factors in Renal Cell Cancer for the Oncological Outcomes Following Nephron-Sparing Surgery: A PRISMA Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full The Clinicopathological Risk Factors in Renal Cell Cancer for the Oncological Outcomes Following Nephron-Sparing Surgery: A PRISMA Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr The Clinicopathological Risk Factors in Renal Cell Cancer for the Oncological Outcomes Following Nephron-Sparing Surgery: A PRISMA Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed The Clinicopathological Risk Factors in Renal Cell Cancer for the Oncological Outcomes Following Nephron-Sparing Surgery: A PRISMA Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short The Clinicopathological Risk Factors in Renal Cell Cancer for the Oncological Outcomes Following Nephron-Sparing Surgery: A PRISMA Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort clinicopathological risk factors in renal cell cancer for the oncological outcomes following nephron-sparing surgery: a prisma systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7067827/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32211325
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.00286
work_keys_str_mv AT zhanglijin theclinicopathologicalriskfactorsinrenalcellcancerfortheoncologicaloutcomesfollowingnephronsparingsurgeryaprismasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wubin theclinicopathologicalriskfactorsinrenalcellcancerfortheoncologicaloutcomesfollowingnephronsparingsurgeryaprismasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhazhenlei theclinicopathologicalriskfactorsinrenalcellcancerfortheoncologicaloutcomesfollowingnephronsparingsurgeryaprismasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT quwei theclinicopathologicalriskfactorsinrenalcellcancerfortheoncologicaloutcomesfollowingnephronsparingsurgeryaprismasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhaohu theclinicopathologicalriskfactorsinrenalcellcancerfortheoncologicaloutcomesfollowingnephronsparingsurgeryaprismasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yuanjun theclinicopathologicalriskfactorsinrenalcellcancerfortheoncologicaloutcomesfollowingnephronsparingsurgeryaprismasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhanglijin clinicopathologicalriskfactorsinrenalcellcancerfortheoncologicaloutcomesfollowingnephronsparingsurgeryaprismasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wubin clinicopathologicalriskfactorsinrenalcellcancerfortheoncologicaloutcomesfollowingnephronsparingsurgeryaprismasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhazhenlei clinicopathologicalriskfactorsinrenalcellcancerfortheoncologicaloutcomesfollowingnephronsparingsurgeryaprismasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT quwei clinicopathologicalriskfactorsinrenalcellcancerfortheoncologicaloutcomesfollowingnephronsparingsurgeryaprismasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhaohu clinicopathologicalriskfactorsinrenalcellcancerfortheoncologicaloutcomesfollowingnephronsparingsurgeryaprismasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yuanjun clinicopathologicalriskfactorsinrenalcellcancerfortheoncologicaloutcomesfollowingnephronsparingsurgeryaprismasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis