Cargando…
Numerical Experiments on the Contrast Capability of Magnetic Resonance Electrical Property Tomography
PURPOSE: Magnetic resonance electrical property tomography (MR EPT) is a technique for non-invasively obtaining the electric property (EP) distribution of biological tissues, with a promising potential for application in the early detection of tumors. However, the contrast capability (CC) of this te...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Japanese Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7067912/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31019159 http://dx.doi.org/10.2463/mrms.mp.2018-0167 |
Sumario: | PURPOSE: Magnetic resonance electrical property tomography (MR EPT) is a technique for non-invasively obtaining the electric property (EP) distribution of biological tissues, with a promising potential for application in the early detection of tumors. However, the contrast capability (CC) of this technique has not been fully studied. This work aims to theoretically explore the CC for detecting the variation of EP values and the size of the imaging region. METHODS: A simulation scheme was specifically designed to evaluate the CC of MR EPT. The simulation study has the advantage that the magnetic field can be accurately obtained. EP maps of the designed phantom embedded with target regions of designated various sizes and EPs were reconstructed using the homogeneous Helmholtz equation based on [Formula: see text] with different signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs). The CC was estimated by determining the smallest detectable EP contrast when the target region size was as large as the Laplacian kernel and the smallest detectable target region size when the EP contrast was the same as the difference between healthy and malignant tissues in the brain, based on the reconstructed EP maps. RESULTS: Using noise free [Formula: see text] , the smallest detectable contrast(σ) and contrast(ε(r)) were 1% and 3%, respectively, and the smallest detectable target region size was 1 mesh unit (the base unit size used in the simulation) for conductivity and relative permittivity. The smallest detectable EP contrast and target region size were decreased as the [Formula: see text] SNR increased. CONCLUSION: The CC of MR EPT was related with the SNR of the magnetic field. A small EP contrast and size were necessary for detection at a high-SNR magnetic field. Obtaining a high-SNR magnetic field is important for improving the CC of MR EPT. |
---|