Cargando…
Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Area-detector CT vs Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Perfusion MRI vs FDG-PET/CT: Comparison of Utility for Quantitative Therapeutic Outcome Prediction for NSCLC Patients Undergoing Chemoradiotherapy
PURPOSE: To directly compare the utility for therapeutic outcome prediction of dynamic first-pass contrast-enhanced (CE)-perfusion area-detector computed tomography (ADCT), MR imaging assessed with the same mathematical method and 2-[fluorine-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose–positron emission tomography...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Japanese Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7067914/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30880291 http://dx.doi.org/10.2463/mrms.mp.2018-0158 |
_version_ | 1783505484021497856 |
---|---|
author | Seki, Shinichiro Fujisawa, Yasuko Yui, Masao Kishida, Yuji Koyama, Hisanobu Ohyu, Shigeharu Sugihara, Naoki Yoshikawa, Takeshi Ohno, Yoshiharu |
author_facet | Seki, Shinichiro Fujisawa, Yasuko Yui, Masao Kishida, Yuji Koyama, Hisanobu Ohyu, Shigeharu Sugihara, Naoki Yoshikawa, Takeshi Ohno, Yoshiharu |
author_sort | Seki, Shinichiro |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To directly compare the utility for therapeutic outcome prediction of dynamic first-pass contrast-enhanced (CE)-perfusion area-detector computed tomography (ADCT), MR imaging assessed with the same mathematical method and 2-[fluorine-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose–positron emission tomography combined with CT (PET/CT) for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with chemoradiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-three consecutive stage IIIB NSCLC patients, consisting of 25 males (mean age ± standard deviation: 66.6 ± 8.7 years) and 18 females (66.4 ± 8.2 years) underwent PET/CT, dynamic CE-perfusion ADCT and MR imaging, chemoradiotherapy, and follow-up examination. In each patient, total, pulmonary arterial, and systemic arterial perfusions were calculated from both perfusion data and SUV(max) on PET/CT, assessed for each targeted lesion, and averaged to determine final values. Receiver operating characteristics analyses were performed to compare the utility for distinguishing responders from non-responders using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor (RECIST) 1.1 criteria. Overall survival (OS) assessed with each index were compared between two groups by means of the Kaplan–Meier method followed by the log-rank test. RESULTS: Area under the curve (Az) for total perfusion on ADCT was significantly larger than that of pulmonary arterial perfusion (P < 0.05). Az of total perfusion on MR imaging was significantly larger than that of pulmonary arterial perfusion (P < 0.05). Mean OS of responder and non-responder groups were significantly different for total and systemic arterial (P < 0.05) perfusion. CONCLUSION: Dynamic first-pass CE-perfusion ADCT and MR imaging as well as PET/CT are useful for early prediction of treatment response by NSCLC patients treated with chemoradiotherapy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7067914 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Japanese Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70679142020-03-19 Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Area-detector CT vs Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Perfusion MRI vs FDG-PET/CT: Comparison of Utility for Quantitative Therapeutic Outcome Prediction for NSCLC Patients Undergoing Chemoradiotherapy Seki, Shinichiro Fujisawa, Yasuko Yui, Masao Kishida, Yuji Koyama, Hisanobu Ohyu, Shigeharu Sugihara, Naoki Yoshikawa, Takeshi Ohno, Yoshiharu Magn Reson Med Sci Major Paper PURPOSE: To directly compare the utility for therapeutic outcome prediction of dynamic first-pass contrast-enhanced (CE)-perfusion area-detector computed tomography (ADCT), MR imaging assessed with the same mathematical method and 2-[fluorine-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose–positron emission tomography combined with CT (PET/CT) for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with chemoradiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-three consecutive stage IIIB NSCLC patients, consisting of 25 males (mean age ± standard deviation: 66.6 ± 8.7 years) and 18 females (66.4 ± 8.2 years) underwent PET/CT, dynamic CE-perfusion ADCT and MR imaging, chemoradiotherapy, and follow-up examination. In each patient, total, pulmonary arterial, and systemic arterial perfusions were calculated from both perfusion data and SUV(max) on PET/CT, assessed for each targeted lesion, and averaged to determine final values. Receiver operating characteristics analyses were performed to compare the utility for distinguishing responders from non-responders using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor (RECIST) 1.1 criteria. Overall survival (OS) assessed with each index were compared between two groups by means of the Kaplan–Meier method followed by the log-rank test. RESULTS: Area under the curve (Az) for total perfusion on ADCT was significantly larger than that of pulmonary arterial perfusion (P < 0.05). Az of total perfusion on MR imaging was significantly larger than that of pulmonary arterial perfusion (P < 0.05). Mean OS of responder and non-responder groups were significantly different for total and systemic arterial (P < 0.05) perfusion. CONCLUSION: Dynamic first-pass CE-perfusion ADCT and MR imaging as well as PET/CT are useful for early prediction of treatment response by NSCLC patients treated with chemoradiotherapy. Japanese Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 2019-03-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7067914/ /pubmed/30880291 http://dx.doi.org/10.2463/mrms.mp.2018-0158 Text en © 2019 Japanese Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Major Paper Seki, Shinichiro Fujisawa, Yasuko Yui, Masao Kishida, Yuji Koyama, Hisanobu Ohyu, Shigeharu Sugihara, Naoki Yoshikawa, Takeshi Ohno, Yoshiharu Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Area-detector CT vs Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Perfusion MRI vs FDG-PET/CT: Comparison of Utility for Quantitative Therapeutic Outcome Prediction for NSCLC Patients Undergoing Chemoradiotherapy |
title | Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Area-detector CT vs Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Perfusion MRI vs FDG-PET/CT: Comparison of Utility for Quantitative Therapeutic Outcome Prediction for NSCLC Patients Undergoing Chemoradiotherapy |
title_full | Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Area-detector CT vs Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Perfusion MRI vs FDG-PET/CT: Comparison of Utility for Quantitative Therapeutic Outcome Prediction for NSCLC Patients Undergoing Chemoradiotherapy |
title_fullStr | Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Area-detector CT vs Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Perfusion MRI vs FDG-PET/CT: Comparison of Utility for Quantitative Therapeutic Outcome Prediction for NSCLC Patients Undergoing Chemoradiotherapy |
title_full_unstemmed | Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Area-detector CT vs Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Perfusion MRI vs FDG-PET/CT: Comparison of Utility for Quantitative Therapeutic Outcome Prediction for NSCLC Patients Undergoing Chemoradiotherapy |
title_short | Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Area-detector CT vs Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Perfusion MRI vs FDG-PET/CT: Comparison of Utility for Quantitative Therapeutic Outcome Prediction for NSCLC Patients Undergoing Chemoradiotherapy |
title_sort | dynamic contrast-enhanced area-detector ct vs dynamic contrast-enhanced perfusion mri vs fdg-pet/ct: comparison of utility for quantitative therapeutic outcome prediction for nsclc patients undergoing chemoradiotherapy |
topic | Major Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7067914/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30880291 http://dx.doi.org/10.2463/mrms.mp.2018-0158 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sekishinichiro dynamiccontrastenhancedareadetectorctvsdynamiccontrastenhancedperfusionmrivsfdgpetctcomparisonofutilityforquantitativetherapeuticoutcomepredictionfornsclcpatientsundergoingchemoradiotherapy AT fujisawayasuko dynamiccontrastenhancedareadetectorctvsdynamiccontrastenhancedperfusionmrivsfdgpetctcomparisonofutilityforquantitativetherapeuticoutcomepredictionfornsclcpatientsundergoingchemoradiotherapy AT yuimasao dynamiccontrastenhancedareadetectorctvsdynamiccontrastenhancedperfusionmrivsfdgpetctcomparisonofutilityforquantitativetherapeuticoutcomepredictionfornsclcpatientsundergoingchemoradiotherapy AT kishidayuji dynamiccontrastenhancedareadetectorctvsdynamiccontrastenhancedperfusionmrivsfdgpetctcomparisonofutilityforquantitativetherapeuticoutcomepredictionfornsclcpatientsundergoingchemoradiotherapy AT koyamahisanobu dynamiccontrastenhancedareadetectorctvsdynamiccontrastenhancedperfusionmrivsfdgpetctcomparisonofutilityforquantitativetherapeuticoutcomepredictionfornsclcpatientsundergoingchemoradiotherapy AT ohyushigeharu dynamiccontrastenhancedareadetectorctvsdynamiccontrastenhancedperfusionmrivsfdgpetctcomparisonofutilityforquantitativetherapeuticoutcomepredictionfornsclcpatientsundergoingchemoradiotherapy AT sugiharanaoki dynamiccontrastenhancedareadetectorctvsdynamiccontrastenhancedperfusionmrivsfdgpetctcomparisonofutilityforquantitativetherapeuticoutcomepredictionfornsclcpatientsundergoingchemoradiotherapy AT yoshikawatakeshi dynamiccontrastenhancedareadetectorctvsdynamiccontrastenhancedperfusionmrivsfdgpetctcomparisonofutilityforquantitativetherapeuticoutcomepredictionfornsclcpatientsundergoingchemoradiotherapy AT ohnoyoshiharu dynamiccontrastenhancedareadetectorctvsdynamiccontrastenhancedperfusionmrivsfdgpetctcomparisonofutilityforquantitativetherapeuticoutcomepredictionfornsclcpatientsundergoingchemoradiotherapy |