Cargando…

Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Area-detector CT vs Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Perfusion MRI vs FDG-PET/CT: Comparison of Utility for Quantitative Therapeutic Outcome Prediction for NSCLC Patients Undergoing Chemoradiotherapy

PURPOSE: To directly compare the utility for therapeutic outcome prediction of dynamic first-pass contrast-enhanced (CE)-perfusion area-detector computed tomography (ADCT), MR imaging assessed with the same mathematical method and 2-[fluorine-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose–positron emission tomography...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Seki, Shinichiro, Fujisawa, Yasuko, Yui, Masao, Kishida, Yuji, Koyama, Hisanobu, Ohyu, Shigeharu, Sugihara, Naoki, Yoshikawa, Takeshi, Ohno, Yoshiharu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Japanese Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7067914/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30880291
http://dx.doi.org/10.2463/mrms.mp.2018-0158
_version_ 1783505484021497856
author Seki, Shinichiro
Fujisawa, Yasuko
Yui, Masao
Kishida, Yuji
Koyama, Hisanobu
Ohyu, Shigeharu
Sugihara, Naoki
Yoshikawa, Takeshi
Ohno, Yoshiharu
author_facet Seki, Shinichiro
Fujisawa, Yasuko
Yui, Masao
Kishida, Yuji
Koyama, Hisanobu
Ohyu, Shigeharu
Sugihara, Naoki
Yoshikawa, Takeshi
Ohno, Yoshiharu
author_sort Seki, Shinichiro
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To directly compare the utility for therapeutic outcome prediction of dynamic first-pass contrast-enhanced (CE)-perfusion area-detector computed tomography (ADCT), MR imaging assessed with the same mathematical method and 2-[fluorine-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose–positron emission tomography combined with CT (PET/CT) for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with chemoradiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-three consecutive stage IIIB NSCLC patients, consisting of 25 males (mean age ± standard deviation: 66.6 ± 8.7 years) and 18 females (66.4 ± 8.2 years) underwent PET/CT, dynamic CE-perfusion ADCT and MR imaging, chemoradiotherapy, and follow-up examination. In each patient, total, pulmonary arterial, and systemic arterial perfusions were calculated from both perfusion data and SUV(max) on PET/CT, assessed for each targeted lesion, and averaged to determine final values. Receiver operating characteristics analyses were performed to compare the utility for distinguishing responders from non-responders using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor (RECIST) 1.1 criteria. Overall survival (OS) assessed with each index were compared between two groups by means of the Kaplan–Meier method followed by the log-rank test. RESULTS: Area under the curve (Az) for total perfusion on ADCT was significantly larger than that of pulmonary arterial perfusion (P < 0.05). Az of total perfusion on MR imaging was significantly larger than that of pulmonary arterial perfusion (P < 0.05). Mean OS of responder and non-responder groups were significantly different for total and systemic arterial (P < 0.05) perfusion. CONCLUSION: Dynamic first-pass CE-perfusion ADCT and MR imaging as well as PET/CT are useful for early prediction of treatment response by NSCLC patients treated with chemoradiotherapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7067914
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Japanese Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70679142020-03-19 Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Area-detector CT vs Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Perfusion MRI vs FDG-PET/CT: Comparison of Utility for Quantitative Therapeutic Outcome Prediction for NSCLC Patients Undergoing Chemoradiotherapy Seki, Shinichiro Fujisawa, Yasuko Yui, Masao Kishida, Yuji Koyama, Hisanobu Ohyu, Shigeharu Sugihara, Naoki Yoshikawa, Takeshi Ohno, Yoshiharu Magn Reson Med Sci Major Paper PURPOSE: To directly compare the utility for therapeutic outcome prediction of dynamic first-pass contrast-enhanced (CE)-perfusion area-detector computed tomography (ADCT), MR imaging assessed with the same mathematical method and 2-[fluorine-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose–positron emission tomography combined with CT (PET/CT) for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with chemoradiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-three consecutive stage IIIB NSCLC patients, consisting of 25 males (mean age ± standard deviation: 66.6 ± 8.7 years) and 18 females (66.4 ± 8.2 years) underwent PET/CT, dynamic CE-perfusion ADCT and MR imaging, chemoradiotherapy, and follow-up examination. In each patient, total, pulmonary arterial, and systemic arterial perfusions were calculated from both perfusion data and SUV(max) on PET/CT, assessed for each targeted lesion, and averaged to determine final values. Receiver operating characteristics analyses were performed to compare the utility for distinguishing responders from non-responders using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor (RECIST) 1.1 criteria. Overall survival (OS) assessed with each index were compared between two groups by means of the Kaplan–Meier method followed by the log-rank test. RESULTS: Area under the curve (Az) for total perfusion on ADCT was significantly larger than that of pulmonary arterial perfusion (P < 0.05). Az of total perfusion on MR imaging was significantly larger than that of pulmonary arterial perfusion (P < 0.05). Mean OS of responder and non-responder groups were significantly different for total and systemic arterial (P < 0.05) perfusion. CONCLUSION: Dynamic first-pass CE-perfusion ADCT and MR imaging as well as PET/CT are useful for early prediction of treatment response by NSCLC patients treated with chemoradiotherapy. Japanese Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 2019-03-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7067914/ /pubmed/30880291 http://dx.doi.org/10.2463/mrms.mp.2018-0158 Text en © 2019 Japanese Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
spellingShingle Major Paper
Seki, Shinichiro
Fujisawa, Yasuko
Yui, Masao
Kishida, Yuji
Koyama, Hisanobu
Ohyu, Shigeharu
Sugihara, Naoki
Yoshikawa, Takeshi
Ohno, Yoshiharu
Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Area-detector CT vs Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Perfusion MRI vs FDG-PET/CT: Comparison of Utility for Quantitative Therapeutic Outcome Prediction for NSCLC Patients Undergoing Chemoradiotherapy
title Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Area-detector CT vs Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Perfusion MRI vs FDG-PET/CT: Comparison of Utility for Quantitative Therapeutic Outcome Prediction for NSCLC Patients Undergoing Chemoradiotherapy
title_full Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Area-detector CT vs Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Perfusion MRI vs FDG-PET/CT: Comparison of Utility for Quantitative Therapeutic Outcome Prediction for NSCLC Patients Undergoing Chemoradiotherapy
title_fullStr Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Area-detector CT vs Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Perfusion MRI vs FDG-PET/CT: Comparison of Utility for Quantitative Therapeutic Outcome Prediction for NSCLC Patients Undergoing Chemoradiotherapy
title_full_unstemmed Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Area-detector CT vs Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Perfusion MRI vs FDG-PET/CT: Comparison of Utility for Quantitative Therapeutic Outcome Prediction for NSCLC Patients Undergoing Chemoradiotherapy
title_short Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Area-detector CT vs Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Perfusion MRI vs FDG-PET/CT: Comparison of Utility for Quantitative Therapeutic Outcome Prediction for NSCLC Patients Undergoing Chemoradiotherapy
title_sort dynamic contrast-enhanced area-detector ct vs dynamic contrast-enhanced perfusion mri vs fdg-pet/ct: comparison of utility for quantitative therapeutic outcome prediction for nsclc patients undergoing chemoradiotherapy
topic Major Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7067914/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30880291
http://dx.doi.org/10.2463/mrms.mp.2018-0158
work_keys_str_mv AT sekishinichiro dynamiccontrastenhancedareadetectorctvsdynamiccontrastenhancedperfusionmrivsfdgpetctcomparisonofutilityforquantitativetherapeuticoutcomepredictionfornsclcpatientsundergoingchemoradiotherapy
AT fujisawayasuko dynamiccontrastenhancedareadetectorctvsdynamiccontrastenhancedperfusionmrivsfdgpetctcomparisonofutilityforquantitativetherapeuticoutcomepredictionfornsclcpatientsundergoingchemoradiotherapy
AT yuimasao dynamiccontrastenhancedareadetectorctvsdynamiccontrastenhancedperfusionmrivsfdgpetctcomparisonofutilityforquantitativetherapeuticoutcomepredictionfornsclcpatientsundergoingchemoradiotherapy
AT kishidayuji dynamiccontrastenhancedareadetectorctvsdynamiccontrastenhancedperfusionmrivsfdgpetctcomparisonofutilityforquantitativetherapeuticoutcomepredictionfornsclcpatientsundergoingchemoradiotherapy
AT koyamahisanobu dynamiccontrastenhancedareadetectorctvsdynamiccontrastenhancedperfusionmrivsfdgpetctcomparisonofutilityforquantitativetherapeuticoutcomepredictionfornsclcpatientsundergoingchemoradiotherapy
AT ohyushigeharu dynamiccontrastenhancedareadetectorctvsdynamiccontrastenhancedperfusionmrivsfdgpetctcomparisonofutilityforquantitativetherapeuticoutcomepredictionfornsclcpatientsundergoingchemoradiotherapy
AT sugiharanaoki dynamiccontrastenhancedareadetectorctvsdynamiccontrastenhancedperfusionmrivsfdgpetctcomparisonofutilityforquantitativetherapeuticoutcomepredictionfornsclcpatientsundergoingchemoradiotherapy
AT yoshikawatakeshi dynamiccontrastenhancedareadetectorctvsdynamiccontrastenhancedperfusionmrivsfdgpetctcomparisonofutilityforquantitativetherapeuticoutcomepredictionfornsclcpatientsundergoingchemoradiotherapy
AT ohnoyoshiharu dynamiccontrastenhancedareadetectorctvsdynamiccontrastenhancedperfusionmrivsfdgpetctcomparisonofutilityforquantitativetherapeuticoutcomepredictionfornsclcpatientsundergoingchemoradiotherapy