Cargando…

Image quality analysis of (44)Sc on two preclinical PET scanners: a comparison to (68)Ga

BACKGROUND: (44)Sc has been increasingly investigated as a potential alternative to (68)Ga in the development of tracers for positron emission tomography (PET). The lower mean positron energy of (44)Sc (0.63 MeV) compared to (68)Ga (0.83 MeV) can result in better spatial image resolutions. However,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rosar, Florian, Buchholz, Hans-Georg, Michels, Sebastian, Hoffmann, Manuela A., Piel, Markus, Waldmann, Christopher M., Rösch, Frank, Reuss, Stefan, Schreckenberger, Mathias
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7067939/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32166581
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40658-020-0286-3
_version_ 1783505487794274304
author Rosar, Florian
Buchholz, Hans-Georg
Michels, Sebastian
Hoffmann, Manuela A.
Piel, Markus
Waldmann, Christopher M.
Rösch, Frank
Reuss, Stefan
Schreckenberger, Mathias
author_facet Rosar, Florian
Buchholz, Hans-Georg
Michels, Sebastian
Hoffmann, Manuela A.
Piel, Markus
Waldmann, Christopher M.
Rösch, Frank
Reuss, Stefan
Schreckenberger, Mathias
author_sort Rosar, Florian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: (44)Sc has been increasingly investigated as a potential alternative to (68)Ga in the development of tracers for positron emission tomography (PET). The lower mean positron energy of (44)Sc (0.63 MeV) compared to (68)Ga (0.83 MeV) can result in better spatial image resolutions. However, high-energy γ-rays (1157 keV) are emitted at high rates (99.9%) during (44)Sc decay, which can reduce image quality. Therefore, we investigated the impact of these physical properties and performed an unbiased performance evaluation of (44)Sc and (68)Ga with different imaging phantoms (image quality phantom, Derenzo phantom, and three-rod phantom) on two preclinical PET scanners (Mediso nanoScan PET/MRI, Siemens microPET Focus 120). RESULTS: Despite the presence of high-energy γ-rays in (44)Sc decay, a higher image resolution of small structures was observed with (44)Sc when compared to (68)Ga. Structures as small as 1.3 mm using the Mediso system, and as small as 1.0 mm using the Siemens system, could be visualized and analyzed by calculating full width at half maximum. Full widths at half maxima were similar for both isotopes. For image quality comparison, we calculated recovery coefficients in 1–5 mm rods and spillover ratios in either air, water, or bone-equivalent material (Teflon). Recovery coefficients for (44)Sc were significantly higher than those for (68)Ga. Despite the lower positron energy, (44)Sc-derived spillover ratio (SOR) values were similar or slightly higher to (68)Ga-derived SOR values. This may be attributed to the higher background caused by the additional γ-rays. On the Siemens system, an overestimation of scatter correction in the central part of the phantom was observed causing a virtual disappearance of spillover inside the three-rod phantom. CONCLUSION: Based on these findings, (44)Sc appears to be a suitable alternative to (68)Ga. The superior image resolution makes it an especially strong competitor in preclinical settings. The additional γ-emissions have a small impact on the imaging resolution but cause higher background noises and can effect an overestimation of scatter correction, depending on the PET system and phantom.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7067939
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70679392020-03-23 Image quality analysis of (44)Sc on two preclinical PET scanners: a comparison to (68)Ga Rosar, Florian Buchholz, Hans-Georg Michels, Sebastian Hoffmann, Manuela A. Piel, Markus Waldmann, Christopher M. Rösch, Frank Reuss, Stefan Schreckenberger, Mathias EJNMMI Phys Original Research BACKGROUND: (44)Sc has been increasingly investigated as a potential alternative to (68)Ga in the development of tracers for positron emission tomography (PET). The lower mean positron energy of (44)Sc (0.63 MeV) compared to (68)Ga (0.83 MeV) can result in better spatial image resolutions. However, high-energy γ-rays (1157 keV) are emitted at high rates (99.9%) during (44)Sc decay, which can reduce image quality. Therefore, we investigated the impact of these physical properties and performed an unbiased performance evaluation of (44)Sc and (68)Ga with different imaging phantoms (image quality phantom, Derenzo phantom, and three-rod phantom) on two preclinical PET scanners (Mediso nanoScan PET/MRI, Siemens microPET Focus 120). RESULTS: Despite the presence of high-energy γ-rays in (44)Sc decay, a higher image resolution of small structures was observed with (44)Sc when compared to (68)Ga. Structures as small as 1.3 mm using the Mediso system, and as small as 1.0 mm using the Siemens system, could be visualized and analyzed by calculating full width at half maximum. Full widths at half maxima were similar for both isotopes. For image quality comparison, we calculated recovery coefficients in 1–5 mm rods and spillover ratios in either air, water, or bone-equivalent material (Teflon). Recovery coefficients for (44)Sc were significantly higher than those for (68)Ga. Despite the lower positron energy, (44)Sc-derived spillover ratio (SOR) values were similar or slightly higher to (68)Ga-derived SOR values. This may be attributed to the higher background caused by the additional γ-rays. On the Siemens system, an overestimation of scatter correction in the central part of the phantom was observed causing a virtual disappearance of spillover inside the three-rod phantom. CONCLUSION: Based on these findings, (44)Sc appears to be a suitable alternative to (68)Ga. The superior image resolution makes it an especially strong competitor in preclinical settings. The additional γ-emissions have a small impact on the imaging resolution but cause higher background noises and can effect an overestimation of scatter correction, depending on the PET system and phantom. Springer International Publishing 2020-03-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7067939/ /pubmed/32166581 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40658-020-0286-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Research
Rosar, Florian
Buchholz, Hans-Georg
Michels, Sebastian
Hoffmann, Manuela A.
Piel, Markus
Waldmann, Christopher M.
Rösch, Frank
Reuss, Stefan
Schreckenberger, Mathias
Image quality analysis of (44)Sc on two preclinical PET scanners: a comparison to (68)Ga
title Image quality analysis of (44)Sc on two preclinical PET scanners: a comparison to (68)Ga
title_full Image quality analysis of (44)Sc on two preclinical PET scanners: a comparison to (68)Ga
title_fullStr Image quality analysis of (44)Sc on two preclinical PET scanners: a comparison to (68)Ga
title_full_unstemmed Image quality analysis of (44)Sc on two preclinical PET scanners: a comparison to (68)Ga
title_short Image quality analysis of (44)Sc on two preclinical PET scanners: a comparison to (68)Ga
title_sort image quality analysis of (44)sc on two preclinical pet scanners: a comparison to (68)ga
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7067939/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32166581
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40658-020-0286-3
work_keys_str_mv AT rosarflorian imagequalityanalysisof44scontwopreclinicalpetscannersacomparisonto68ga
AT buchholzhansgeorg imagequalityanalysisof44scontwopreclinicalpetscannersacomparisonto68ga
AT michelssebastian imagequalityanalysisof44scontwopreclinicalpetscannersacomparisonto68ga
AT hoffmannmanuelaa imagequalityanalysisof44scontwopreclinicalpetscannersacomparisonto68ga
AT pielmarkus imagequalityanalysisof44scontwopreclinicalpetscannersacomparisonto68ga
AT waldmannchristopherm imagequalityanalysisof44scontwopreclinicalpetscannersacomparisonto68ga
AT roschfrank imagequalityanalysisof44scontwopreclinicalpetscannersacomparisonto68ga
AT reussstefan imagequalityanalysisof44scontwopreclinicalpetscannersacomparisonto68ga
AT schreckenbergermathias imagequalityanalysisof44scontwopreclinicalpetscannersacomparisonto68ga