Cargando…

Quantification of [(11)C]PBR28 data after systemic lipopolysaccharide challenge

BACKGROUND: Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) is a classic immune stimulus. LPS combined with positron emission tomography (PET) 18 kDa translocator protein (TSPO) brain imaging provides a robust human laboratory model to study neuroimmune signaling. To evaluate optimal analysis of these data, this work comp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Woodcock, Eric A., Schain, Martin, Cosgrove, Kelly P., Hillmer, Ansel T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7067964/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32166497
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-020-0605-7
_version_ 1783505492099727360
author Woodcock, Eric A.
Schain, Martin
Cosgrove, Kelly P.
Hillmer, Ansel T.
author_facet Woodcock, Eric A.
Schain, Martin
Cosgrove, Kelly P.
Hillmer, Ansel T.
author_sort Woodcock, Eric A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) is a classic immune stimulus. LPS combined with positron emission tomography (PET) 18 kDa translocator protein (TSPO) brain imaging provides a robust human laboratory model to study neuroimmune signaling. To evaluate optimal analysis of these data, this work compared the sensitivity of six quantification approaches. METHODS: [(11)C]PBR28 data from healthy volunteers (N = 8) were collected before and 3 h after LPS challenge (1.0 ng/kg IV). Quantification approaches included total volume of distribution estimated with two tissue, and two tissue plus irreversible uptake in whole blood, compartment models (2TCM and 2TCM-1k, respectively) and multilinear analysis-1 (MA-1); binding potential estimated with simultaneous estimation (SIME); standardized uptake values (SUV); and SUV ratio (SUVR). RESULTS: The 2TCM, 2TCM-1k, MA-1, and SIME approaches each yielded substantive effect sizes for LPS effects (partial η(2) = 0.56–0.89, ps <. 05), whereas SUV and SUVR did not. CONCLUSION: These findings highlight the importance of incorporating AIF measurements to quantify LPS-TSPO studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7067964
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70679642020-03-23 Quantification of [(11)C]PBR28 data after systemic lipopolysaccharide challenge Woodcock, Eric A. Schain, Martin Cosgrove, Kelly P. Hillmer, Ansel T. EJNMMI Res Short Communication BACKGROUND: Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) is a classic immune stimulus. LPS combined with positron emission tomography (PET) 18 kDa translocator protein (TSPO) brain imaging provides a robust human laboratory model to study neuroimmune signaling. To evaluate optimal analysis of these data, this work compared the sensitivity of six quantification approaches. METHODS: [(11)C]PBR28 data from healthy volunteers (N = 8) were collected before and 3 h after LPS challenge (1.0 ng/kg IV). Quantification approaches included total volume of distribution estimated with two tissue, and two tissue plus irreversible uptake in whole blood, compartment models (2TCM and 2TCM-1k, respectively) and multilinear analysis-1 (MA-1); binding potential estimated with simultaneous estimation (SIME); standardized uptake values (SUV); and SUV ratio (SUVR). RESULTS: The 2TCM, 2TCM-1k, MA-1, and SIME approaches each yielded substantive effect sizes for LPS effects (partial η(2) = 0.56–0.89, ps <. 05), whereas SUV and SUVR did not. CONCLUSION: These findings highlight the importance of incorporating AIF measurements to quantify LPS-TSPO studies. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-03-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7067964/ /pubmed/32166497 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-020-0605-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Short Communication
Woodcock, Eric A.
Schain, Martin
Cosgrove, Kelly P.
Hillmer, Ansel T.
Quantification of [(11)C]PBR28 data after systemic lipopolysaccharide challenge
title Quantification of [(11)C]PBR28 data after systemic lipopolysaccharide challenge
title_full Quantification of [(11)C]PBR28 data after systemic lipopolysaccharide challenge
title_fullStr Quantification of [(11)C]PBR28 data after systemic lipopolysaccharide challenge
title_full_unstemmed Quantification of [(11)C]PBR28 data after systemic lipopolysaccharide challenge
title_short Quantification of [(11)C]PBR28 data after systemic lipopolysaccharide challenge
title_sort quantification of [(11)c]pbr28 data after systemic lipopolysaccharide challenge
topic Short Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7067964/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32166497
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-020-0605-7
work_keys_str_mv AT woodcockerica quantificationof11cpbr28dataaftersystemiclipopolysaccharidechallenge
AT schainmartin quantificationof11cpbr28dataaftersystemiclipopolysaccharidechallenge
AT cosgrovekellyp quantificationof11cpbr28dataaftersystemiclipopolysaccharidechallenge
AT hillmeranselt quantificationof11cpbr28dataaftersystemiclipopolysaccharidechallenge