Cargando…

Clinically Meaningful Difference for the Infant Gastroesophageal Questionnaire Revised version (I-GERQ-R): A Quantitative Synthesis

BACKGROUND: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GORD) is a common condition affecting 30% of infants aged 0–23 months. The Infant Gastroesophageal Questionnaire Revised version (I-GERQ-R) is an observer-reported outcome measures (ObsRO) developed to evaluate the impact of GORD on young infants. However...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Smith, Adam B, Fawkes, Neil, Kotze, Helen, Hodgkinson, Victoria, Coyle, Cathal
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7068037/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32189972
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PROM.S238673
_version_ 1783505496524718080
author Smith, Adam B
Fawkes, Neil
Kotze, Helen
Hodgkinson, Victoria
Coyle, Cathal
author_facet Smith, Adam B
Fawkes, Neil
Kotze, Helen
Hodgkinson, Victoria
Coyle, Cathal
author_sort Smith, Adam B
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GORD) is a common condition affecting 30% of infants aged 0–23 months. The Infant Gastroesophageal Questionnaire Revised version (I-GERQ-R) is an observer-reported outcome measures (ObsRO) developed to evaluate the impact of GORD on young infants. However, evidence regarding the clinically important difference (CID) for the I-GERQ-R is limited. The aim of this study was to determine a CID for the I-GERQ-R. METHODS: A literature review was undertaken (PsycInfo, Embase, MedLine and EconLit databases) for longitudinal studies involving the I-GERQ-R. Articles were not limited by language or publication date. A random effects model was applied to calculate an overall CID, along with I(2) and Q statistics. Publication bias was also assessed. RESULTS: The search identified 42 articles; 11 were selected for full-text review and 7 articles were identified for full data extraction. The studies included a total of 661 infants (range: 30 to 313); 424 infants had been diagnosed with GORD (64%). The age range of the infants across the studies was from birth to 7 months. The overall CID was −6.54 (95% confidence interval: −4.35 to −8.74), Q = 17.96, p=0.08 and I(2)=22.04. CONCLUSION: This study derived a CID for the I-GERQ-R and indicated a threshold around 6 could signify a clinically important difference for this instrument. The lower limit of the 95% confidence interval suggested a threshold of 3 to 4 could represent a minimally important difference. These results may help inform clinical decisions in evaluating meaningful change in symptom severity in children affected by GORD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7068037
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70680372020-03-18 Clinically Meaningful Difference for the Infant Gastroesophageal Questionnaire Revised version (I-GERQ-R): A Quantitative Synthesis Smith, Adam B Fawkes, Neil Kotze, Helen Hodgkinson, Victoria Coyle, Cathal Patient Relat Outcome Meas Original Research BACKGROUND: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GORD) is a common condition affecting 30% of infants aged 0–23 months. The Infant Gastroesophageal Questionnaire Revised version (I-GERQ-R) is an observer-reported outcome measures (ObsRO) developed to evaluate the impact of GORD on young infants. However, evidence regarding the clinically important difference (CID) for the I-GERQ-R is limited. The aim of this study was to determine a CID for the I-GERQ-R. METHODS: A literature review was undertaken (PsycInfo, Embase, MedLine and EconLit databases) for longitudinal studies involving the I-GERQ-R. Articles were not limited by language or publication date. A random effects model was applied to calculate an overall CID, along with I(2) and Q statistics. Publication bias was also assessed. RESULTS: The search identified 42 articles; 11 were selected for full-text review and 7 articles were identified for full data extraction. The studies included a total of 661 infants (range: 30 to 313); 424 infants had been diagnosed with GORD (64%). The age range of the infants across the studies was from birth to 7 months. The overall CID was −6.54 (95% confidence interval: −4.35 to −8.74), Q = 17.96, p=0.08 and I(2)=22.04. CONCLUSION: This study derived a CID for the I-GERQ-R and indicated a threshold around 6 could signify a clinically important difference for this instrument. The lower limit of the 95% confidence interval suggested a threshold of 3 to 4 could represent a minimally important difference. These results may help inform clinical decisions in evaluating meaningful change in symptom severity in children affected by GORD. Dove 2020-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7068037/ /pubmed/32189972 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PROM.S238673 Text en © 2020 Smith et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Smith, Adam B
Fawkes, Neil
Kotze, Helen
Hodgkinson, Victoria
Coyle, Cathal
Clinically Meaningful Difference for the Infant Gastroesophageal Questionnaire Revised version (I-GERQ-R): A Quantitative Synthesis
title Clinically Meaningful Difference for the Infant Gastroesophageal Questionnaire Revised version (I-GERQ-R): A Quantitative Synthesis
title_full Clinically Meaningful Difference for the Infant Gastroesophageal Questionnaire Revised version (I-GERQ-R): A Quantitative Synthesis
title_fullStr Clinically Meaningful Difference for the Infant Gastroesophageal Questionnaire Revised version (I-GERQ-R): A Quantitative Synthesis
title_full_unstemmed Clinically Meaningful Difference for the Infant Gastroesophageal Questionnaire Revised version (I-GERQ-R): A Quantitative Synthesis
title_short Clinically Meaningful Difference for the Infant Gastroesophageal Questionnaire Revised version (I-GERQ-R): A Quantitative Synthesis
title_sort clinically meaningful difference for the infant gastroesophageal questionnaire revised version (i-gerq-r): a quantitative synthesis
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7068037/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32189972
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PROM.S238673
work_keys_str_mv AT smithadamb clinicallymeaningfuldifferencefortheinfantgastroesophagealquestionnairerevisedversionigerqraquantitativesynthesis
AT fawkesneil clinicallymeaningfuldifferencefortheinfantgastroesophagealquestionnairerevisedversionigerqraquantitativesynthesis
AT kotzehelen clinicallymeaningfuldifferencefortheinfantgastroesophagealquestionnairerevisedversionigerqraquantitativesynthesis
AT hodgkinsonvictoria clinicallymeaningfuldifferencefortheinfantgastroesophagealquestionnairerevisedversionigerqraquantitativesynthesis
AT coylecathal clinicallymeaningfuldifferencefortheinfantgastroesophagealquestionnairerevisedversionigerqraquantitativesynthesis