Cargando…
Defining and managing patients with non‐ST‐elevation myocardial infarction: Sorting through type 1 vs other types
Advances in cardiovascular (CV) imaging, redefined electrocardiogram criteria, and high‐sensitivity CV biomarker assays have enabled more differentiated etiological classification of myocardial infarction (MI). Type 1 MI has a different underlying pathophysiology than type 2 through type 5 MI; type...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7068071/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31923336 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/clc.23308 |
_version_ | 1783505503608897536 |
---|---|
author | Cohen, Marc Visveswaran, Gautam |
author_facet | Cohen, Marc Visveswaran, Gautam |
author_sort | Cohen, Marc |
collection | PubMed |
description | Advances in cardiovascular (CV) imaging, redefined electrocardiogram criteria, and high‐sensitivity CV biomarker assays have enabled more differentiated etiological classification of myocardial infarction (MI). Type 1 MI has a different underlying pathophysiology than type 2 through type 5 MI; type 1 MI is characterized primarily by intracoronary atherothrombosis and the other types by a variety of mechanisms, which can occur with or without an atherosclerotic component. In type 2 MI, there is evidence of myocardial oxygen supply‐demand imbalance unrelated to acute coronary atherothrombosis. Types 1 and 2 MI are spontaneous events, while type 4 and type 5 are procedure‐related; type 3 MI is identified only after death. Most type 1 and type 2 MI present as non‐ST‐elevation MI (NSTEMI), although both types can also present as ST‐elevation MI. Because of their different underlying etiologies, type 1 and type 2 NSTEMI have different presentation and prognosis and should be managed differently. In this article, we discuss the epidemiology, prognosis, and management of NSTEMI occurring in the setting of underlying type 1 or type 2 pathophysiology. Most NSTEMI (65%–90%) are type 1 MI. Patients with type 2 MI have multiple comorbidities and causes of in‐hospital mortality among these patients are not always CV‐related. It is important to distinguish between type 1 and type 2 NSTEMI early in the clinical course to allow for the use of the most appropriate treatments that will provide the greatest benefit for these patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7068071 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Wiley Periodicals, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70680712020-03-17 Defining and managing patients with non‐ST‐elevation myocardial infarction: Sorting through type 1 vs other types Cohen, Marc Visveswaran, Gautam Clin Cardiol Reviews Advances in cardiovascular (CV) imaging, redefined electrocardiogram criteria, and high‐sensitivity CV biomarker assays have enabled more differentiated etiological classification of myocardial infarction (MI). Type 1 MI has a different underlying pathophysiology than type 2 through type 5 MI; type 1 MI is characterized primarily by intracoronary atherothrombosis and the other types by a variety of mechanisms, which can occur with or without an atherosclerotic component. In type 2 MI, there is evidence of myocardial oxygen supply‐demand imbalance unrelated to acute coronary atherothrombosis. Types 1 and 2 MI are spontaneous events, while type 4 and type 5 are procedure‐related; type 3 MI is identified only after death. Most type 1 and type 2 MI present as non‐ST‐elevation MI (NSTEMI), although both types can also present as ST‐elevation MI. Because of their different underlying etiologies, type 1 and type 2 NSTEMI have different presentation and prognosis and should be managed differently. In this article, we discuss the epidemiology, prognosis, and management of NSTEMI occurring in the setting of underlying type 1 or type 2 pathophysiology. Most NSTEMI (65%–90%) are type 1 MI. Patients with type 2 MI have multiple comorbidities and causes of in‐hospital mortality among these patients are not always CV‐related. It is important to distinguish between type 1 and type 2 NSTEMI early in the clinical course to allow for the use of the most appropriate treatments that will provide the greatest benefit for these patients. Wiley Periodicals, Inc. 2020-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7068071/ /pubmed/31923336 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/clc.23308 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Clinical Cardiology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Reviews Cohen, Marc Visveswaran, Gautam Defining and managing patients with non‐ST‐elevation myocardial infarction: Sorting through type 1 vs other types |
title | Defining and managing patients with non‐ST‐elevation myocardial infarction: Sorting through type 1 vs other types |
title_full | Defining and managing patients with non‐ST‐elevation myocardial infarction: Sorting through type 1 vs other types |
title_fullStr | Defining and managing patients with non‐ST‐elevation myocardial infarction: Sorting through type 1 vs other types |
title_full_unstemmed | Defining and managing patients with non‐ST‐elevation myocardial infarction: Sorting through type 1 vs other types |
title_short | Defining and managing patients with non‐ST‐elevation myocardial infarction: Sorting through type 1 vs other types |
title_sort | defining and managing patients with non‐st‐elevation myocardial infarction: sorting through type 1 vs other types |
topic | Reviews |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7068071/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31923336 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/clc.23308 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cohenmarc definingandmanagingpatientswithnonstelevationmyocardialinfarctionsortingthroughtype1vsothertypes AT visveswarangautam definingandmanagingpatientswithnonstelevationmyocardialinfarctionsortingthroughtype1vsothertypes |