Cargando…

Validation of a 3D CBCT-based protocol for the follow-up of mandibular condyle remodeling

OBJECTIVES: Three-dimensional models of mandibular condyles provide a way for condylar remodeling follow-up. The overall aim was to develop and validate a user-friendly workflow for cone beam CT (CBCT)-based semi-automatic condylar registration and segmentation. METHODS: A rigid voxel-based registra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Verhelst, Pieter-Jan, Shaheen, Eman, de Faria Vasconcelos, Karla, Van der Cruyssen, Fréderic, Shujaat, Sohaib, Coudyzer, Walter, Salmon, Benjamin, Swennen, Gwen, Politis, Constantinus, Jacobs, Reinhilde
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The British Institute of Radiology. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7068073/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31674794
http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20190364
_version_ 1783505504057688064
author Verhelst, Pieter-Jan
Shaheen, Eman
de Faria Vasconcelos, Karla
Van der Cruyssen, Fréderic
Shujaat, Sohaib
Coudyzer, Walter
Salmon, Benjamin
Swennen, Gwen
Politis, Constantinus
Jacobs, Reinhilde
author_facet Verhelst, Pieter-Jan
Shaheen, Eman
de Faria Vasconcelos, Karla
Van der Cruyssen, Fréderic
Shujaat, Sohaib
Coudyzer, Walter
Salmon, Benjamin
Swennen, Gwen
Politis, Constantinus
Jacobs, Reinhilde
author_sort Verhelst, Pieter-Jan
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Three-dimensional models of mandibular condyles provide a way for condylar remodeling follow-up. The overall aim was to develop and validate a user-friendly workflow for cone beam CT (CBCT)-based semi-automatic condylar registration and segmentation. METHODS: A rigid voxel-based registration (VBR) technique for registration of two post-operative CBCT-scans was tested. Two modified mandibular rami, with or without gonial angle, were investigated as the volume of interest for registration. Inter- and intraoperator reproducibility of this technique was tested on 10 mandibular rami of orthognathic patients by means of intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC’s) and descriptive statistics of the transformation values from the VBR. The difference in reproducibility between the two modified rami was evaluated using a paired t-test (p < 0.05). For the segmentation, eight fresh frozen cadaver heads were scanned with CBCT and micro-CT. These data were used to test the inter- and intraoperator reproducibility (ICC’s) and accuracy (Bland–Altman plot) of a newly designed workflow based on semi-automated contour enhancement. RESULTS: Excellent ICC’s (0.94–0.99) were obtained for the voxel-based registration technique using both modified rami. If the gonial angle was not included in the volume of interest, there was a trend of increased operator error suggested by significant higher interoperator differences in translation values (p = 0,0036). The segmentation workflow proved to be highly reproducible with excellent ICC’s (0.99), low absolute mean volume differences between operators (23.19 mm(3)), within operators (28.93 mm(3)) and low surface distances between models of different operators (<0.20 mm). Regarding the accuracy, CBCT-models slightly overestimate the condylar volume compared to micro-CT. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a validated user-friendly and reproducible method of creating three-dimensional-surface models of mandibular condyles out of longitudinal CBCT-scans.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7068073
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher The British Institute of Radiology.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70680732021-03-01 Validation of a 3D CBCT-based protocol for the follow-up of mandibular condyle remodeling Verhelst, Pieter-Jan Shaheen, Eman de Faria Vasconcelos, Karla Van der Cruyssen, Fréderic Shujaat, Sohaib Coudyzer, Walter Salmon, Benjamin Swennen, Gwen Politis, Constantinus Jacobs, Reinhilde Dentomaxillofac Radiol Technical Report OBJECTIVES: Three-dimensional models of mandibular condyles provide a way for condylar remodeling follow-up. The overall aim was to develop and validate a user-friendly workflow for cone beam CT (CBCT)-based semi-automatic condylar registration and segmentation. METHODS: A rigid voxel-based registration (VBR) technique for registration of two post-operative CBCT-scans was tested. Two modified mandibular rami, with or without gonial angle, were investigated as the volume of interest for registration. Inter- and intraoperator reproducibility of this technique was tested on 10 mandibular rami of orthognathic patients by means of intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC’s) and descriptive statistics of the transformation values from the VBR. The difference in reproducibility between the two modified rami was evaluated using a paired t-test (p < 0.05). For the segmentation, eight fresh frozen cadaver heads were scanned with CBCT and micro-CT. These data were used to test the inter- and intraoperator reproducibility (ICC’s) and accuracy (Bland–Altman plot) of a newly designed workflow based on semi-automated contour enhancement. RESULTS: Excellent ICC’s (0.94–0.99) were obtained for the voxel-based registration technique using both modified rami. If the gonial angle was not included in the volume of interest, there was a trend of increased operator error suggested by significant higher interoperator differences in translation values (p = 0,0036). The segmentation workflow proved to be highly reproducible with excellent ICC’s (0.99), low absolute mean volume differences between operators (23.19 mm(3)), within operators (28.93 mm(3)) and low surface distances between models of different operators (<0.20 mm). Regarding the accuracy, CBCT-models slightly overestimate the condylar volume compared to micro-CT. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a validated user-friendly and reproducible method of creating three-dimensional-surface models of mandibular condyles out of longitudinal CBCT-scans. The British Institute of Radiology. 2020-03 2020-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7068073/ /pubmed/31674794 http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20190364 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Published by the British Institute of Radiology. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 Unported License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/, which permits unrestricted non-commercial reuse, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Technical Report
Verhelst, Pieter-Jan
Shaheen, Eman
de Faria Vasconcelos, Karla
Van der Cruyssen, Fréderic
Shujaat, Sohaib
Coudyzer, Walter
Salmon, Benjamin
Swennen, Gwen
Politis, Constantinus
Jacobs, Reinhilde
Validation of a 3D CBCT-based protocol for the follow-up of mandibular condyle remodeling
title Validation of a 3D CBCT-based protocol for the follow-up of mandibular condyle remodeling
title_full Validation of a 3D CBCT-based protocol for the follow-up of mandibular condyle remodeling
title_fullStr Validation of a 3D CBCT-based protocol for the follow-up of mandibular condyle remodeling
title_full_unstemmed Validation of a 3D CBCT-based protocol for the follow-up of mandibular condyle remodeling
title_short Validation of a 3D CBCT-based protocol for the follow-up of mandibular condyle remodeling
title_sort validation of a 3d cbct-based protocol for the follow-up of mandibular condyle remodeling
topic Technical Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7068073/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31674794
http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20190364
work_keys_str_mv AT verhelstpieterjan validationofa3dcbctbasedprotocolforthefollowupofmandibularcondyleremodeling
AT shaheeneman validationofa3dcbctbasedprotocolforthefollowupofmandibularcondyleremodeling
AT defariavasconceloskarla validationofa3dcbctbasedprotocolforthefollowupofmandibularcondyleremodeling
AT vandercruyssenfrederic validationofa3dcbctbasedprotocolforthefollowupofmandibularcondyleremodeling
AT shujaatsohaib validationofa3dcbctbasedprotocolforthefollowupofmandibularcondyleremodeling
AT coudyzerwalter validationofa3dcbctbasedprotocolforthefollowupofmandibularcondyleremodeling
AT salmonbenjamin validationofa3dcbctbasedprotocolforthefollowupofmandibularcondyleremodeling
AT swennengwen validationofa3dcbctbasedprotocolforthefollowupofmandibularcondyleremodeling
AT politisconstantinus validationofa3dcbctbasedprotocolforthefollowupofmandibularcondyleremodeling
AT jacobsreinhilde validationofa3dcbctbasedprotocolforthefollowupofmandibularcondyleremodeling