Cargando…

Does Primary Vomer Flap Significantly Affect Maxillary Growth?

BACKGROUND: Cleft lip and palate (CLP) is a common congenital anomaly. Efficient surgical management of CLP is challenging in severe cases with wide clefts. Use of primary vomer flap simultaneous with cleft lip repair is effective in some cases, but remains a challenging topic. METHODS: This study e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Emami, Abolhasan, Hashemzadeh, Haleh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Iranian Society for Plastic Surgeons 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7068186/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32190594
http://dx.doi.org/10.29252/wjps.9.1.62
_version_ 1783505522893258752
author Emami, Abolhasan
Hashemzadeh, Haleh
author_facet Emami, Abolhasan
Hashemzadeh, Haleh
author_sort Emami, Abolhasan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cleft lip and palate (CLP) is a common congenital anomaly. Efficient surgical management of CLP is challenging in severe cases with wide clefts. Use of primary vomer flap simultaneous with cleft lip repair is effective in some cases, but remains a challenging topic. METHODS: This study evaluated 81 non-syndromic CLP patients with extensive palatal cleft and no other underlying condition. Thirty-nine patients (group A) who were infants over 6 months of age underwent primary vomer flap during lip repair to decrease the size of their extensive palatal cleft. The results in this group were compared with group B (n=42) who did not receive primary vomer flap. RESULTS: Comparison of the two groups showed that although maxillary growth impairment and maxillary constriction had a higher frequency in group A, the palatal cleft was smaller among them, which enabled easier and more efficient cleft repair in the next step. The difference in maxillary growth impairment was not significant between the two groups. However, the prevalence of some complications such as velopharyngeal incompetence and maxillary growth impairment was slightly higher in group A compared with group B. CONCLUSION: Use of primary vomer flap at the time of lip repair can decrease the size of palatal cleft and enhance its later closure. However, since impairment of the maxillary growth was slightly (but insignificantly) higher in the vomer flap group, it should be performed at ages over 6 months of age, as well as in certain cases.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7068186
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Iranian Society for Plastic Surgeons
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70681862020-03-18 Does Primary Vomer Flap Significantly Affect Maxillary Growth? Emami, Abolhasan Hashemzadeh, Haleh World J Plast Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: Cleft lip and palate (CLP) is a common congenital anomaly. Efficient surgical management of CLP is challenging in severe cases with wide clefts. Use of primary vomer flap simultaneous with cleft lip repair is effective in some cases, but remains a challenging topic. METHODS: This study evaluated 81 non-syndromic CLP patients with extensive palatal cleft and no other underlying condition. Thirty-nine patients (group A) who were infants over 6 months of age underwent primary vomer flap during lip repair to decrease the size of their extensive palatal cleft. The results in this group were compared with group B (n=42) who did not receive primary vomer flap. RESULTS: Comparison of the two groups showed that although maxillary growth impairment and maxillary constriction had a higher frequency in group A, the palatal cleft was smaller among them, which enabled easier and more efficient cleft repair in the next step. The difference in maxillary growth impairment was not significant between the two groups. However, the prevalence of some complications such as velopharyngeal incompetence and maxillary growth impairment was slightly higher in group A compared with group B. CONCLUSION: Use of primary vomer flap at the time of lip repair can decrease the size of palatal cleft and enhance its later closure. However, since impairment of the maxillary growth was slightly (but insignificantly) higher in the vomer flap group, it should be performed at ages over 6 months of age, as well as in certain cases. Iranian Society for Plastic Surgeons 2020-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7068186/ /pubmed/32190594 http://dx.doi.org/10.29252/wjps.9.1.62 Text en This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Emami, Abolhasan
Hashemzadeh, Haleh
Does Primary Vomer Flap Significantly Affect Maxillary Growth?
title Does Primary Vomer Flap Significantly Affect Maxillary Growth?
title_full Does Primary Vomer Flap Significantly Affect Maxillary Growth?
title_fullStr Does Primary Vomer Flap Significantly Affect Maxillary Growth?
title_full_unstemmed Does Primary Vomer Flap Significantly Affect Maxillary Growth?
title_short Does Primary Vomer Flap Significantly Affect Maxillary Growth?
title_sort does primary vomer flap significantly affect maxillary growth?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7068186/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32190594
http://dx.doi.org/10.29252/wjps.9.1.62
work_keys_str_mv AT emamiabolhasan doesprimaryvomerflapsignificantlyaffectmaxillarygrowth
AT hashemzadehhaleh doesprimaryvomerflapsignificantlyaffectmaxillarygrowth