Cargando…
Does Primary Vomer Flap Significantly Affect Maxillary Growth?
BACKGROUND: Cleft lip and palate (CLP) is a common congenital anomaly. Efficient surgical management of CLP is challenging in severe cases with wide clefts. Use of primary vomer flap simultaneous with cleft lip repair is effective in some cases, but remains a challenging topic. METHODS: This study e...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Iranian Society for Plastic Surgeons
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7068186/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32190594 http://dx.doi.org/10.29252/wjps.9.1.62 |
_version_ | 1783505522893258752 |
---|---|
author | Emami, Abolhasan Hashemzadeh, Haleh |
author_facet | Emami, Abolhasan Hashemzadeh, Haleh |
author_sort | Emami, Abolhasan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Cleft lip and palate (CLP) is a common congenital anomaly. Efficient surgical management of CLP is challenging in severe cases with wide clefts. Use of primary vomer flap simultaneous with cleft lip repair is effective in some cases, but remains a challenging topic. METHODS: This study evaluated 81 non-syndromic CLP patients with extensive palatal cleft and no other underlying condition. Thirty-nine patients (group A) who were infants over 6 months of age underwent primary vomer flap during lip repair to decrease the size of their extensive palatal cleft. The results in this group were compared with group B (n=42) who did not receive primary vomer flap. RESULTS: Comparison of the two groups showed that although maxillary growth impairment and maxillary constriction had a higher frequency in group A, the palatal cleft was smaller among them, which enabled easier and more efficient cleft repair in the next step. The difference in maxillary growth impairment was not significant between the two groups. However, the prevalence of some complications such as velopharyngeal incompetence and maxillary growth impairment was slightly higher in group A compared with group B. CONCLUSION: Use of primary vomer flap at the time of lip repair can decrease the size of palatal cleft and enhance its later closure. However, since impairment of the maxillary growth was slightly (but insignificantly) higher in the vomer flap group, it should be performed at ages over 6 months of age, as well as in certain cases. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7068186 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Iranian Society for Plastic Surgeons |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70681862020-03-18 Does Primary Vomer Flap Significantly Affect Maxillary Growth? Emami, Abolhasan Hashemzadeh, Haleh World J Plast Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: Cleft lip and palate (CLP) is a common congenital anomaly. Efficient surgical management of CLP is challenging in severe cases with wide clefts. Use of primary vomer flap simultaneous with cleft lip repair is effective in some cases, but remains a challenging topic. METHODS: This study evaluated 81 non-syndromic CLP patients with extensive palatal cleft and no other underlying condition. Thirty-nine patients (group A) who were infants over 6 months of age underwent primary vomer flap during lip repair to decrease the size of their extensive palatal cleft. The results in this group were compared with group B (n=42) who did not receive primary vomer flap. RESULTS: Comparison of the two groups showed that although maxillary growth impairment and maxillary constriction had a higher frequency in group A, the palatal cleft was smaller among them, which enabled easier and more efficient cleft repair in the next step. The difference in maxillary growth impairment was not significant between the two groups. However, the prevalence of some complications such as velopharyngeal incompetence and maxillary growth impairment was slightly higher in group A compared with group B. CONCLUSION: Use of primary vomer flap at the time of lip repair can decrease the size of palatal cleft and enhance its later closure. However, since impairment of the maxillary growth was slightly (but insignificantly) higher in the vomer flap group, it should be performed at ages over 6 months of age, as well as in certain cases. Iranian Society for Plastic Surgeons 2020-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7068186/ /pubmed/32190594 http://dx.doi.org/10.29252/wjps.9.1.62 Text en This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Emami, Abolhasan Hashemzadeh, Haleh Does Primary Vomer Flap Significantly Affect Maxillary Growth? |
title | Does Primary Vomer Flap Significantly Affect Maxillary Growth? |
title_full | Does Primary Vomer Flap Significantly Affect Maxillary Growth? |
title_fullStr | Does Primary Vomer Flap Significantly Affect Maxillary Growth? |
title_full_unstemmed | Does Primary Vomer Flap Significantly Affect Maxillary Growth? |
title_short | Does Primary Vomer Flap Significantly Affect Maxillary Growth? |
title_sort | does primary vomer flap significantly affect maxillary growth? |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7068186/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32190594 http://dx.doi.org/10.29252/wjps.9.1.62 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT emamiabolhasan doesprimaryvomerflapsignificantlyaffectmaxillarygrowth AT hashemzadehhaleh doesprimaryvomerflapsignificantlyaffectmaxillarygrowth |