Cargando…

Comparison of Liquid Chromatography Mass Spectrometry and Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay Methods to Measure Salivary Cotinine Levels in Ill Children

Objective: Cotinine is the preferred biomarker to validate levels of tobacco smoke exposure (TSE) in children. Compared to enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay methods (ELISA) for quantifying cotinine in saliva, the use of liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) has higher sensitivity...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mahabee-Gittens, E. Melinda, Mazzella, Matthew J., Doucette, John T., Merianos, Ashley L., Stone, Lara, Wullenweber, Chase A., A. Busgang, Stefanie, Matt, Georg E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7068296/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32059566
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17041157
_version_ 1783505547186667520
author Mahabee-Gittens, E. Melinda
Mazzella, Matthew J.
Doucette, John T.
Merianos, Ashley L.
Stone, Lara
Wullenweber, Chase A.
A. Busgang, Stefanie
Matt, Georg E.
author_facet Mahabee-Gittens, E. Melinda
Mazzella, Matthew J.
Doucette, John T.
Merianos, Ashley L.
Stone, Lara
Wullenweber, Chase A.
A. Busgang, Stefanie
Matt, Georg E.
author_sort Mahabee-Gittens, E. Melinda
collection PubMed
description Objective: Cotinine is the preferred biomarker to validate levels of tobacco smoke exposure (TSE) in children. Compared to enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay methods (ELISA) for quantifying cotinine in saliva, the use of liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) has higher sensitivity and specificity to measure very low levels of TSE. We sought to compare LC-MS/MS and ELISA measures of cotinine in saliva samples from children overall and the associations of these measures with demographics and TSE patterns. Method: Participants were nonsmoking children (N = 218; age mean (SD) = 6.1 (5.1) years) presenting to a pediatric emergency department. Saliva samples were analyzed for cotinine using both LC-MS/MS and ELISA. Limit of quantitation (LOQ) for LC-MS/MS and ELISA was 0.1 ng/mL and 0.15 ng/mL, respectively. Results: Intraclass correlations (ICC) across methods = 0.884 and was consistent in sex and age subgroups. The geometric mean (GeoM) of LC-MS/MS = 4.1 (range: < LOQ to 382 ng/mL; 3% < LOQ) which was lower (p < 0.0001) than the ELISA GeoM = 5.7 (range: < LOQ to 364 ng/mL; 5% < LOQ). Similar associations of cotinine concentrations with age ([Formula: see text] < −0.10, p < 0.0001), demographic characteristics (e.g., income), and number of cigarettes smoked by caregiver ([Formula: see text] > 0.07, p < 0.0001) were found regardless of cotinine detection method; however, cotinine associations with sex and race/ethnicity were only found to be significant in models using LC-MS/MS-derived cotinine. Conclusions: Utilizing LC-MS/MS-based cotinine, associations of cotinine with sex and race/ethnicity of child were revealed that were not detectable using ELISA-based cotinine, demonstrating the benefits of utilizing the more sensitive LC-MS/MS assay for cotinine measurement when detecting low levels of TSE in children.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7068296
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70682962020-03-19 Comparison of Liquid Chromatography Mass Spectrometry and Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay Methods to Measure Salivary Cotinine Levels in Ill Children Mahabee-Gittens, E. Melinda Mazzella, Matthew J. Doucette, John T. Merianos, Ashley L. Stone, Lara Wullenweber, Chase A. A. Busgang, Stefanie Matt, Georg E. Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Objective: Cotinine is the preferred biomarker to validate levels of tobacco smoke exposure (TSE) in children. Compared to enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay methods (ELISA) for quantifying cotinine in saliva, the use of liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) has higher sensitivity and specificity to measure very low levels of TSE. We sought to compare LC-MS/MS and ELISA measures of cotinine in saliva samples from children overall and the associations of these measures with demographics and TSE patterns. Method: Participants were nonsmoking children (N = 218; age mean (SD) = 6.1 (5.1) years) presenting to a pediatric emergency department. Saliva samples were analyzed for cotinine using both LC-MS/MS and ELISA. Limit of quantitation (LOQ) for LC-MS/MS and ELISA was 0.1 ng/mL and 0.15 ng/mL, respectively. Results: Intraclass correlations (ICC) across methods = 0.884 and was consistent in sex and age subgroups. The geometric mean (GeoM) of LC-MS/MS = 4.1 (range: < LOQ to 382 ng/mL; 3% < LOQ) which was lower (p < 0.0001) than the ELISA GeoM = 5.7 (range: < LOQ to 364 ng/mL; 5% < LOQ). Similar associations of cotinine concentrations with age ([Formula: see text] < −0.10, p < 0.0001), demographic characteristics (e.g., income), and number of cigarettes smoked by caregiver ([Formula: see text] > 0.07, p < 0.0001) were found regardless of cotinine detection method; however, cotinine associations with sex and race/ethnicity were only found to be significant in models using LC-MS/MS-derived cotinine. Conclusions: Utilizing LC-MS/MS-based cotinine, associations of cotinine with sex and race/ethnicity of child were revealed that were not detectable using ELISA-based cotinine, demonstrating the benefits of utilizing the more sensitive LC-MS/MS assay for cotinine measurement when detecting low levels of TSE in children. MDPI 2020-02-12 2020-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7068296/ /pubmed/32059566 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17041157 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Mahabee-Gittens, E. Melinda
Mazzella, Matthew J.
Doucette, John T.
Merianos, Ashley L.
Stone, Lara
Wullenweber, Chase A.
A. Busgang, Stefanie
Matt, Georg E.
Comparison of Liquid Chromatography Mass Spectrometry and Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay Methods to Measure Salivary Cotinine Levels in Ill Children
title Comparison of Liquid Chromatography Mass Spectrometry and Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay Methods to Measure Salivary Cotinine Levels in Ill Children
title_full Comparison of Liquid Chromatography Mass Spectrometry and Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay Methods to Measure Salivary Cotinine Levels in Ill Children
title_fullStr Comparison of Liquid Chromatography Mass Spectrometry and Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay Methods to Measure Salivary Cotinine Levels in Ill Children
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Liquid Chromatography Mass Spectrometry and Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay Methods to Measure Salivary Cotinine Levels in Ill Children
title_short Comparison of Liquid Chromatography Mass Spectrometry and Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay Methods to Measure Salivary Cotinine Levels in Ill Children
title_sort comparison of liquid chromatography mass spectrometry and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay methods to measure salivary cotinine levels in ill children
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7068296/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32059566
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17041157
work_keys_str_mv AT mahabeegittensemelinda comparisonofliquidchromatographymassspectrometryandenzymelinkedimmunosorbentassaymethodstomeasuresalivarycotininelevelsinillchildren
AT mazzellamatthewj comparisonofliquidchromatographymassspectrometryandenzymelinkedimmunosorbentassaymethodstomeasuresalivarycotininelevelsinillchildren
AT doucettejohnt comparisonofliquidchromatographymassspectrometryandenzymelinkedimmunosorbentassaymethodstomeasuresalivarycotininelevelsinillchildren
AT merianosashleyl comparisonofliquidchromatographymassspectrometryandenzymelinkedimmunosorbentassaymethodstomeasuresalivarycotininelevelsinillchildren
AT stonelara comparisonofliquidchromatographymassspectrometryandenzymelinkedimmunosorbentassaymethodstomeasuresalivarycotininelevelsinillchildren
AT wullenweberchasea comparisonofliquidchromatographymassspectrometryandenzymelinkedimmunosorbentassaymethodstomeasuresalivarycotininelevelsinillchildren
AT abusgangstefanie comparisonofliquidchromatographymassspectrometryandenzymelinkedimmunosorbentassaymethodstomeasuresalivarycotininelevelsinillchildren
AT mattgeorge comparisonofliquidchromatographymassspectrometryandenzymelinkedimmunosorbentassaymethodstomeasuresalivarycotininelevelsinillchildren