Cargando…

Association between Smoking and Noise-Induced Hearing Loss: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies

The purpose of this study was to synthesize the results of previously published observational studies through meta-analysis to clarify the association between smoking and noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL). We searched several databases as of October 2019. Based on the results of heterogeneity analys...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Xiaowen, Rong, Xing, Wang, Zhi, Lin, Aihua
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7068375/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32069960
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17041201
_version_ 1783505565136191488
author Li, Xiaowen
Rong, Xing
Wang, Zhi
Lin, Aihua
author_facet Li, Xiaowen
Rong, Xing
Wang, Zhi
Lin, Aihua
author_sort Li, Xiaowen
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this study was to synthesize the results of previously published observational studies through meta-analysis to clarify the association between smoking and noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL). We searched several databases as of October 2019. Based on the results of heterogeneity analysis (Q statistic and I(2) statistic), a fixed effect model (for no heterogeneity; Q test P > 0.1 and I(2) ≤ 50%) or a random effects model (for heterogeneity) was used to calculate the pooled odds ratios (ORs). We explored the potential dose-response relationship between smoking and NIHL as well. In total, 27 studies involving 30,465 participants were included. Compared with non-smokers, the pooled OR of current smokers was 2.05 (95% Confidence interval (CI): 1.71–2.46), and of former smokers was 1.11 (95% CI: 1.05–1.18). We found a curve linear association between an increasing number of pack-years (packages/day × smoking years) and risk of NIHL. The dose-response meta-analysis suggested that when the number of pack-years was less than fifteen, the risk of NIHL was increasing, and the highest combined OR was 5.25 (95% CI: 2.30–11.96) for pack-years of fifteen. After fifteen pack-years, the pooled OR had a slow decline. Our study indicated that smoking is a risk factor for NIHL. Current smokers have a higher risk than former smokers, and there is a positive dose-response relationship between smoking and NIHL.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7068375
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70683752020-03-19 Association between Smoking and Noise-Induced Hearing Loss: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies Li, Xiaowen Rong, Xing Wang, Zhi Lin, Aihua Int J Environ Res Public Health Review The purpose of this study was to synthesize the results of previously published observational studies through meta-analysis to clarify the association between smoking and noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL). We searched several databases as of October 2019. Based on the results of heterogeneity analysis (Q statistic and I(2) statistic), a fixed effect model (for no heterogeneity; Q test P > 0.1 and I(2) ≤ 50%) or a random effects model (for heterogeneity) was used to calculate the pooled odds ratios (ORs). We explored the potential dose-response relationship between smoking and NIHL as well. In total, 27 studies involving 30,465 participants were included. Compared with non-smokers, the pooled OR of current smokers was 2.05 (95% Confidence interval (CI): 1.71–2.46), and of former smokers was 1.11 (95% CI: 1.05–1.18). We found a curve linear association between an increasing number of pack-years (packages/day × smoking years) and risk of NIHL. The dose-response meta-analysis suggested that when the number of pack-years was less than fifteen, the risk of NIHL was increasing, and the highest combined OR was 5.25 (95% CI: 2.30–11.96) for pack-years of fifteen. After fifteen pack-years, the pooled OR had a slow decline. Our study indicated that smoking is a risk factor for NIHL. Current smokers have a higher risk than former smokers, and there is a positive dose-response relationship between smoking and NIHL. MDPI 2020-02-13 2020-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7068375/ /pubmed/32069960 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17041201 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Li, Xiaowen
Rong, Xing
Wang, Zhi
Lin, Aihua
Association between Smoking and Noise-Induced Hearing Loss: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies
title Association between Smoking and Noise-Induced Hearing Loss: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies
title_full Association between Smoking and Noise-Induced Hearing Loss: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies
title_fullStr Association between Smoking and Noise-Induced Hearing Loss: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies
title_full_unstemmed Association between Smoking and Noise-Induced Hearing Loss: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies
title_short Association between Smoking and Noise-Induced Hearing Loss: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies
title_sort association between smoking and noise-induced hearing loss: a meta-analysis of observational studies
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7068375/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32069960
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17041201
work_keys_str_mv AT lixiaowen associationbetweensmokingandnoiseinducedhearinglossametaanalysisofobservationalstudies
AT rongxing associationbetweensmokingandnoiseinducedhearinglossametaanalysisofobservationalstudies
AT wangzhi associationbetweensmokingandnoiseinducedhearinglossametaanalysisofobservationalstudies
AT linaihua associationbetweensmokingandnoiseinducedhearinglossametaanalysisofobservationalstudies