Cargando…

Reliability of 30-s Chair Stand Test with and without Cognitive Task in People with Type-2 Diabetes Mellitus

Background: Reliability refers to the precision of an assessment, so it is a critical topic to take the right decisions related to health management. People usually perform several tasks at the same time in their daily life. The aim of this study was to examine the reliability of the 30-s chair stan...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barrios-Fernández, Sabina, Pérez-Gómez, Jorge, Galán-Arroyo, María del Carmen, Señorán-Rivera, Jairo, Martín-Carmona, Rubén, Mendoza-Muñoz, María, García-Gordillo, Miguel Ángel, Domínguez-Muñoz, Francisco Javier, Adsuar, José Carmelo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7068475/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32102379
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17041450
_version_ 1783505588449181696
author Barrios-Fernández, Sabina
Pérez-Gómez, Jorge
Galán-Arroyo, María del Carmen
Señorán-Rivera, Jairo
Martín-Carmona, Rubén
Mendoza-Muñoz, María
García-Gordillo, Miguel Ángel
Domínguez-Muñoz, Francisco Javier
Adsuar, José Carmelo
author_facet Barrios-Fernández, Sabina
Pérez-Gómez, Jorge
Galán-Arroyo, María del Carmen
Señorán-Rivera, Jairo
Martín-Carmona, Rubén
Mendoza-Muñoz, María
García-Gordillo, Miguel Ángel
Domínguez-Muñoz, Francisco Javier
Adsuar, José Carmelo
author_sort Barrios-Fernández, Sabina
collection PubMed
description Background: Reliability refers to the precision of an assessment, so it is a critical topic to take the right decisions related to health management. People usually perform several tasks at the same time in their daily life. The aim of this study was to examine the reliability of the 30-s chair stand test in people with type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) with test–retest, with and without dual-task (motor + cognitive task). Methods: Twenty-six subjects with T2DM and 30 subjects without T2DM performed the 30-s Chair Stand Test (30sCST) in which they must sit and stand as many times as possible in 30 s. They performed the test in the usual way (30sCST) and also with an additional cognitive task (30sCST-DT). A retest was conducted 7–14 days later. Results: Relative reliability was excellent in both groups (intraclass correlation coefficient > 0.9). In 30sCST-DT, relative reliability was high in the T2DM group (intraclass correlation coefficient > 0.7) and excellent in subjects without T2DM (intraclass correlation coefficient > 0.9). Conclusions: The 30sCST and the 30sCST-DT tests are reliable tools for people with T2DM to measure changes after an intervention. The smallest real difference was 15% and 20% upper in the T2DM group in the 30sCST and 30sCST-DT tests, respectively.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7068475
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70684752020-03-19 Reliability of 30-s Chair Stand Test with and without Cognitive Task in People with Type-2 Diabetes Mellitus Barrios-Fernández, Sabina Pérez-Gómez, Jorge Galán-Arroyo, María del Carmen Señorán-Rivera, Jairo Martín-Carmona, Rubén Mendoza-Muñoz, María García-Gordillo, Miguel Ángel Domínguez-Muñoz, Francisco Javier Adsuar, José Carmelo Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Background: Reliability refers to the precision of an assessment, so it is a critical topic to take the right decisions related to health management. People usually perform several tasks at the same time in their daily life. The aim of this study was to examine the reliability of the 30-s chair stand test in people with type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) with test–retest, with and without dual-task (motor + cognitive task). Methods: Twenty-six subjects with T2DM and 30 subjects without T2DM performed the 30-s Chair Stand Test (30sCST) in which they must sit and stand as many times as possible in 30 s. They performed the test in the usual way (30sCST) and also with an additional cognitive task (30sCST-DT). A retest was conducted 7–14 days later. Results: Relative reliability was excellent in both groups (intraclass correlation coefficient > 0.9). In 30sCST-DT, relative reliability was high in the T2DM group (intraclass correlation coefficient > 0.7) and excellent in subjects without T2DM (intraclass correlation coefficient > 0.9). Conclusions: The 30sCST and the 30sCST-DT tests are reliable tools for people with T2DM to measure changes after an intervention. The smallest real difference was 15% and 20% upper in the T2DM group in the 30sCST and 30sCST-DT tests, respectively. MDPI 2020-02-24 2020-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7068475/ /pubmed/32102379 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17041450 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Barrios-Fernández, Sabina
Pérez-Gómez, Jorge
Galán-Arroyo, María del Carmen
Señorán-Rivera, Jairo
Martín-Carmona, Rubén
Mendoza-Muñoz, María
García-Gordillo, Miguel Ángel
Domínguez-Muñoz, Francisco Javier
Adsuar, José Carmelo
Reliability of 30-s Chair Stand Test with and without Cognitive Task in People with Type-2 Diabetes Mellitus
title Reliability of 30-s Chair Stand Test with and without Cognitive Task in People with Type-2 Diabetes Mellitus
title_full Reliability of 30-s Chair Stand Test with and without Cognitive Task in People with Type-2 Diabetes Mellitus
title_fullStr Reliability of 30-s Chair Stand Test with and without Cognitive Task in People with Type-2 Diabetes Mellitus
title_full_unstemmed Reliability of 30-s Chair Stand Test with and without Cognitive Task in People with Type-2 Diabetes Mellitus
title_short Reliability of 30-s Chair Stand Test with and without Cognitive Task in People with Type-2 Diabetes Mellitus
title_sort reliability of 30-s chair stand test with and without cognitive task in people with type-2 diabetes mellitus
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7068475/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32102379
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17041450
work_keys_str_mv AT barriosfernandezsabina reliabilityof30schairstandtestwithandwithoutcognitivetaskinpeoplewithtype2diabetesmellitus
AT perezgomezjorge reliabilityof30schairstandtestwithandwithoutcognitivetaskinpeoplewithtype2diabetesmellitus
AT galanarroyomariadelcarmen reliabilityof30schairstandtestwithandwithoutcognitivetaskinpeoplewithtype2diabetesmellitus
AT senoranriverajairo reliabilityof30schairstandtestwithandwithoutcognitivetaskinpeoplewithtype2diabetesmellitus
AT martincarmonaruben reliabilityof30schairstandtestwithandwithoutcognitivetaskinpeoplewithtype2diabetesmellitus
AT mendozamunozmaria reliabilityof30schairstandtestwithandwithoutcognitivetaskinpeoplewithtype2diabetesmellitus
AT garciagordillomiguelangel reliabilityof30schairstandtestwithandwithoutcognitivetaskinpeoplewithtype2diabetesmellitus
AT dominguezmunozfranciscojavier reliabilityof30schairstandtestwithandwithoutcognitivetaskinpeoplewithtype2diabetesmellitus
AT adsuarjosecarmelo reliabilityof30schairstandtestwithandwithoutcognitivetaskinpeoplewithtype2diabetesmellitus