Cargando…
Dose–Response Relationship between Physical Workload and Specific Shoulder Diseases—A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis
Several epidemiological studies have found an association between shoulder-loaded work activities and specific shoulder diseases. No study has derived the dose-response relationship and resulting doubling dose, important for the recognition of occupational diseases. This systematic review is an upda...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7068556/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32075183 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17041243 |
_version_ | 1783505607156826112 |
---|---|
author | Seidler, Andreas Romero Starke, Karla Freiberg, Alice Hegewald, Janice Nienhaus, Albert Bolm-Audorff, Ulrich |
author_facet | Seidler, Andreas Romero Starke, Karla Freiberg, Alice Hegewald, Janice Nienhaus, Albert Bolm-Audorff, Ulrich |
author_sort | Seidler, Andreas |
collection | PubMed |
description | Several epidemiological studies have found an association between shoulder-loaded work activities and specific shoulder diseases. No study has derived the dose-response relationship and resulting doubling dose, important for the recognition of occupational diseases. This systematic review is an update of the van der Molen et al. (2017) review. Based on its methodologies, we identified new studies published up to November 2018. The dose-response relationship between physical occupational demands (hands at/above shoulder level, repetitive movements, forceful work, hand-arm vibrations) and specific shoulder diseases (defined as ICD-10 M 75.1-5: rotator cuff syndrome, bicipital tendinitis, calcific tendinitis, impingement, and bursitis) was derived. No evidence for sex-specific differences in the dose-response relationship was found. If there were at least two studies with comparable exposures, a meta-analysis was carried out. The pooled analysis resulted in a 21% risk increase (95% CI 4–41%) per 1000 h of work with hands above shoulder level. A meta-analysis was not possible for other occupational burdens due to the low number of studies and differing exposure measurements; an estimate of the doubling dose was made based on the cohort study of Dalbøge et al. (2014). To conclude, the present systematic review with meta-analysis contributes to knowledge of the level of exposure at which specific shoulder diseases—particularly rotator cuff lesions—should be recognized as an occupational disease. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7068556 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70685562020-03-19 Dose–Response Relationship between Physical Workload and Specific Shoulder Diseases—A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis Seidler, Andreas Romero Starke, Karla Freiberg, Alice Hegewald, Janice Nienhaus, Albert Bolm-Audorff, Ulrich Int J Environ Res Public Health Review Several epidemiological studies have found an association between shoulder-loaded work activities and specific shoulder diseases. No study has derived the dose-response relationship and resulting doubling dose, important for the recognition of occupational diseases. This systematic review is an update of the van der Molen et al. (2017) review. Based on its methodologies, we identified new studies published up to November 2018. The dose-response relationship between physical occupational demands (hands at/above shoulder level, repetitive movements, forceful work, hand-arm vibrations) and specific shoulder diseases (defined as ICD-10 M 75.1-5: rotator cuff syndrome, bicipital tendinitis, calcific tendinitis, impingement, and bursitis) was derived. No evidence for sex-specific differences in the dose-response relationship was found. If there were at least two studies with comparable exposures, a meta-analysis was carried out. The pooled analysis resulted in a 21% risk increase (95% CI 4–41%) per 1000 h of work with hands above shoulder level. A meta-analysis was not possible for other occupational burdens due to the low number of studies and differing exposure measurements; an estimate of the doubling dose was made based on the cohort study of Dalbøge et al. (2014). To conclude, the present systematic review with meta-analysis contributes to knowledge of the level of exposure at which specific shoulder diseases—particularly rotator cuff lesions—should be recognized as an occupational disease. MDPI 2020-02-14 2020-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7068556/ /pubmed/32075183 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17041243 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Seidler, Andreas Romero Starke, Karla Freiberg, Alice Hegewald, Janice Nienhaus, Albert Bolm-Audorff, Ulrich Dose–Response Relationship between Physical Workload and Specific Shoulder Diseases—A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis |
title | Dose–Response Relationship between Physical Workload and Specific Shoulder Diseases—A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Dose–Response Relationship between Physical Workload and Specific Shoulder Diseases—A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Dose–Response Relationship between Physical Workload and Specific Shoulder Diseases—A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Dose–Response Relationship between Physical Workload and Specific Shoulder Diseases—A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Dose–Response Relationship between Physical Workload and Specific Shoulder Diseases—A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | dose–response relationship between physical workload and specific shoulder diseases—a systematic review with meta-analysis |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7068556/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32075183 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17041243 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT seidlerandreas doseresponserelationshipbetweenphysicalworkloadandspecificshoulderdiseasesasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis AT romerostarkekarla doseresponserelationshipbetweenphysicalworkloadandspecificshoulderdiseasesasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis AT freibergalice doseresponserelationshipbetweenphysicalworkloadandspecificshoulderdiseasesasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis AT hegewaldjanice doseresponserelationshipbetweenphysicalworkloadandspecificshoulderdiseasesasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis AT nienhausalbert doseresponserelationshipbetweenphysicalworkloadandspecificshoulderdiseasesasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis AT bolmaudorffulrich doseresponserelationshipbetweenphysicalworkloadandspecificshoulderdiseasesasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis |