Cargando…

Dose–Response Relationship between Physical Workload and Specific Shoulder Diseases—A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis

Several epidemiological studies have found an association between shoulder-loaded work activities and specific shoulder diseases. No study has derived the dose-response relationship and resulting doubling dose, important for the recognition of occupational diseases. This systematic review is an upda...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Seidler, Andreas, Romero Starke, Karla, Freiberg, Alice, Hegewald, Janice, Nienhaus, Albert, Bolm-Audorff, Ulrich
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7068556/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32075183
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17041243
_version_ 1783505607156826112
author Seidler, Andreas
Romero Starke, Karla
Freiberg, Alice
Hegewald, Janice
Nienhaus, Albert
Bolm-Audorff, Ulrich
author_facet Seidler, Andreas
Romero Starke, Karla
Freiberg, Alice
Hegewald, Janice
Nienhaus, Albert
Bolm-Audorff, Ulrich
author_sort Seidler, Andreas
collection PubMed
description Several epidemiological studies have found an association between shoulder-loaded work activities and specific shoulder diseases. No study has derived the dose-response relationship and resulting doubling dose, important for the recognition of occupational diseases. This systematic review is an update of the van der Molen et al. (2017) review. Based on its methodologies, we identified new studies published up to November 2018. The dose-response relationship between physical occupational demands (hands at/above shoulder level, repetitive movements, forceful work, hand-arm vibrations) and specific shoulder diseases (defined as ICD-10 M 75.1-5: rotator cuff syndrome, bicipital tendinitis, calcific tendinitis, impingement, and bursitis) was derived. No evidence for sex-specific differences in the dose-response relationship was found. If there were at least two studies with comparable exposures, a meta-analysis was carried out. The pooled analysis resulted in a 21% risk increase (95% CI 4–41%) per 1000 h of work with hands above shoulder level. A meta-analysis was not possible for other occupational burdens due to the low number of studies and differing exposure measurements; an estimate of the doubling dose was made based on the cohort study of Dalbøge et al. (2014). To conclude, the present systematic review with meta-analysis contributes to knowledge of the level of exposure at which specific shoulder diseases—particularly rotator cuff lesions—should be recognized as an occupational disease.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7068556
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70685562020-03-19 Dose–Response Relationship between Physical Workload and Specific Shoulder Diseases—A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis Seidler, Andreas Romero Starke, Karla Freiberg, Alice Hegewald, Janice Nienhaus, Albert Bolm-Audorff, Ulrich Int J Environ Res Public Health Review Several epidemiological studies have found an association between shoulder-loaded work activities and specific shoulder diseases. No study has derived the dose-response relationship and resulting doubling dose, important for the recognition of occupational diseases. This systematic review is an update of the van der Molen et al. (2017) review. Based on its methodologies, we identified new studies published up to November 2018. The dose-response relationship between physical occupational demands (hands at/above shoulder level, repetitive movements, forceful work, hand-arm vibrations) and specific shoulder diseases (defined as ICD-10 M 75.1-5: rotator cuff syndrome, bicipital tendinitis, calcific tendinitis, impingement, and bursitis) was derived. No evidence for sex-specific differences in the dose-response relationship was found. If there were at least two studies with comparable exposures, a meta-analysis was carried out. The pooled analysis resulted in a 21% risk increase (95% CI 4–41%) per 1000 h of work with hands above shoulder level. A meta-analysis was not possible for other occupational burdens due to the low number of studies and differing exposure measurements; an estimate of the doubling dose was made based on the cohort study of Dalbøge et al. (2014). To conclude, the present systematic review with meta-analysis contributes to knowledge of the level of exposure at which specific shoulder diseases—particularly rotator cuff lesions—should be recognized as an occupational disease. MDPI 2020-02-14 2020-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7068556/ /pubmed/32075183 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17041243 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Seidler, Andreas
Romero Starke, Karla
Freiberg, Alice
Hegewald, Janice
Nienhaus, Albert
Bolm-Audorff, Ulrich
Dose–Response Relationship between Physical Workload and Specific Shoulder Diseases—A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis
title Dose–Response Relationship between Physical Workload and Specific Shoulder Diseases—A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis
title_full Dose–Response Relationship between Physical Workload and Specific Shoulder Diseases—A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Dose–Response Relationship between Physical Workload and Specific Shoulder Diseases—A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Dose–Response Relationship between Physical Workload and Specific Shoulder Diseases—A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis
title_short Dose–Response Relationship between Physical Workload and Specific Shoulder Diseases—A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis
title_sort dose–response relationship between physical workload and specific shoulder diseases—a systematic review with meta-analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7068556/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32075183
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17041243
work_keys_str_mv AT seidlerandreas doseresponserelationshipbetweenphysicalworkloadandspecificshoulderdiseasesasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT romerostarkekarla doseresponserelationshipbetweenphysicalworkloadandspecificshoulderdiseasesasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT freibergalice doseresponserelationshipbetweenphysicalworkloadandspecificshoulderdiseasesasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT hegewaldjanice doseresponserelationshipbetweenphysicalworkloadandspecificshoulderdiseasesasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT nienhausalbert doseresponserelationshipbetweenphysicalworkloadandspecificshoulderdiseasesasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT bolmaudorffulrich doseresponserelationshipbetweenphysicalworkloadandspecificshoulderdiseasesasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis