Comparative Clinical Study Between Modified Ureteral Orthotopic Reimplantation and Cohen Method Under Pneumovesicum in Pediatric Patients With Hydroureteronephrosis

Purpose: To report our initial experience with a modified ureteral orthotopic reimplantation technique under pneumovesicum and compare the outcomes vs. those obtained with the Cohen technique under pneumovesicum for the correction of primary obstructive megaureter (POM) or vesicoureteral reflux(VUR) in pediatric patients. Methods: A total of 46 patients (38 POM and 8 VUR; mean age: 16.24 months) treated with modified ureteral orthotopic reimplantation (OR) and 43 patients (34 POM and 9 VUR; mean age: 22.98 months) treated with Cohen reimplantation (CR) under pneumovesicum were included. We compared the results perioperatively and during follow-up. Results: The mean operative time was significantly shorter in the OR group (OR: 86.86 and 108.18 vs. CR: 95.14 and 124.29 min for unilateral and bilateral cases, respectively). The mean postoperative hospital stay (OR: 5.02 vs. CR: 5.07 days), blood loss (OR: 3.67 vs. CR: 3.84 ml), and follow-up time (OR: 23.17 vs. CR: 23.37 months) did not exhibit significant differences between the two groups. One patient converted to open surgery in the CR group, whereas there was no conversion in the OR group. Postoperative febrile urinary tract infection occurred in two cases in each group. Both infections were controlled using antibiotics. All patients in both groups showed improved hydroureteronephrosis, and all patients with VUR showed reflux resolution post-surgery. Conclusions: Our modified ureteral orthotopic reimplantation technique under pneumovesicum can be safely and effectively performed, achieving a high success rate that is equivalent to that obtained through the Cohen technique under pneumovesicum. Moreover, it involves a simpler procedure and shorter operation time.