Cargando…

Mortality prediction by SOFA score in ICU-patients after cardiac surgery; comparison with traditional prognostic–models

BACKGROUND: There are many prognostic models and scoring systems in use to predict mortality in ICU patients. The only general ICU scoring system developed and validated for patients after cardiac surgery is the APACHE-IV model. This is, however, a labor-intensive scoring system requiring a lot of d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schoe, Abraham, Bakhshi-Raiez, Ferishta, de Keizer, Nicolette, van Dissel, Jaap T., de Jonge, Evert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7068937/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32169047
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-020-00975-2
_version_ 1783505675698044928
author Schoe, Abraham
Bakhshi-Raiez, Ferishta
de Keizer, Nicolette
van Dissel, Jaap T.
de Jonge, Evert
author_facet Schoe, Abraham
Bakhshi-Raiez, Ferishta
de Keizer, Nicolette
van Dissel, Jaap T.
de Jonge, Evert
author_sort Schoe, Abraham
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There are many prognostic models and scoring systems in use to predict mortality in ICU patients. The only general ICU scoring system developed and validated for patients after cardiac surgery is the APACHE-IV model. This is, however, a labor-intensive scoring system requiring a lot of data and could therefore be prone to error. The SOFA score on the other hand is a simpler system, has been widely used in ICUs and could be a good alternative. The goal of the study was to compare the SOFA score with the APACHE-IV and other ICU prediction models. METHODS: We investigated, in a large cohort of cardiac surgery patients admitted to Dutch ICUs, how well the SOFA score from the first 24 h after admission, predict hospital and ICU mortality in comparison with other recalibrated general ICU scoring systems. Measures of discrimination, accuracy, and calibration (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), Brier score, R(2), and Ĉ-statistic) were calculated using bootstrapping. The cohort consisted of 36,632 Patients from the Dutch National Intensive Care Evaluation (NICE) registry having had a cardiac surgery procedure for which ICU admission was necessary between January 1st, 2006 and June 31st, 2018. RESULTS: Discrimination of the SOFA-, APACHE-IV-, APACHE-II-, SAPS-II-, MPM(24)-II - models to predict hospital mortality was good with an AUC of respectively: 0.809, 0.851, 0.830, 0.850, 0.801. Discrimination of the SOFA-, APACHE-IV-, APACHE-II-, SAPS-II-, MPM(24)-II - models to predict ICU mortality was slightly better with AUCs of respectively: 0.809, 0.906, 0.892, 0.919, 0.862. Calibration of the models was generally poor. CONCLUSION: Although the SOFA score had a good discriminatory power for hospital- and ICU mortality the discriminatory power of the APACHE-IV and SAPS-II was better. The SOFA score should not be preferred as mortality prediction model above traditional prognostic ICU-models.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7068937
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70689372020-03-18 Mortality prediction by SOFA score in ICU-patients after cardiac surgery; comparison with traditional prognostic–models Schoe, Abraham Bakhshi-Raiez, Ferishta de Keizer, Nicolette van Dissel, Jaap T. de Jonge, Evert BMC Anesthesiol Research Article BACKGROUND: There are many prognostic models and scoring systems in use to predict mortality in ICU patients. The only general ICU scoring system developed and validated for patients after cardiac surgery is the APACHE-IV model. This is, however, a labor-intensive scoring system requiring a lot of data and could therefore be prone to error. The SOFA score on the other hand is a simpler system, has been widely used in ICUs and could be a good alternative. The goal of the study was to compare the SOFA score with the APACHE-IV and other ICU prediction models. METHODS: We investigated, in a large cohort of cardiac surgery patients admitted to Dutch ICUs, how well the SOFA score from the first 24 h after admission, predict hospital and ICU mortality in comparison with other recalibrated general ICU scoring systems. Measures of discrimination, accuracy, and calibration (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), Brier score, R(2), and Ĉ-statistic) were calculated using bootstrapping. The cohort consisted of 36,632 Patients from the Dutch National Intensive Care Evaluation (NICE) registry having had a cardiac surgery procedure for which ICU admission was necessary between January 1st, 2006 and June 31st, 2018. RESULTS: Discrimination of the SOFA-, APACHE-IV-, APACHE-II-, SAPS-II-, MPM(24)-II - models to predict hospital mortality was good with an AUC of respectively: 0.809, 0.851, 0.830, 0.850, 0.801. Discrimination of the SOFA-, APACHE-IV-, APACHE-II-, SAPS-II-, MPM(24)-II - models to predict ICU mortality was slightly better with AUCs of respectively: 0.809, 0.906, 0.892, 0.919, 0.862. Calibration of the models was generally poor. CONCLUSION: Although the SOFA score had a good discriminatory power for hospital- and ICU mortality the discriminatory power of the APACHE-IV and SAPS-II was better. The SOFA score should not be preferred as mortality prediction model above traditional prognostic ICU-models. BioMed Central 2020-03-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7068937/ /pubmed/32169047 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-020-00975-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Schoe, Abraham
Bakhshi-Raiez, Ferishta
de Keizer, Nicolette
van Dissel, Jaap T.
de Jonge, Evert
Mortality prediction by SOFA score in ICU-patients after cardiac surgery; comparison with traditional prognostic–models
title Mortality prediction by SOFA score in ICU-patients after cardiac surgery; comparison with traditional prognostic–models
title_full Mortality prediction by SOFA score in ICU-patients after cardiac surgery; comparison with traditional prognostic–models
title_fullStr Mortality prediction by SOFA score in ICU-patients after cardiac surgery; comparison with traditional prognostic–models
title_full_unstemmed Mortality prediction by SOFA score in ICU-patients after cardiac surgery; comparison with traditional prognostic–models
title_short Mortality prediction by SOFA score in ICU-patients after cardiac surgery; comparison with traditional prognostic–models
title_sort mortality prediction by sofa score in icu-patients after cardiac surgery; comparison with traditional prognostic–models
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7068937/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32169047
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-020-00975-2
work_keys_str_mv AT schoeabraham mortalitypredictionbysofascoreinicupatientsaftercardiacsurgerycomparisonwithtraditionalprognosticmodels
AT bakhshiraiezferishta mortalitypredictionbysofascoreinicupatientsaftercardiacsurgerycomparisonwithtraditionalprognosticmodels
AT dekeizernicolette mortalitypredictionbysofascoreinicupatientsaftercardiacsurgerycomparisonwithtraditionalprognosticmodels
AT vandisseljaapt mortalitypredictionbysofascoreinicupatientsaftercardiacsurgerycomparisonwithtraditionalprognosticmodels
AT dejongeevert mortalitypredictionbysofascoreinicupatientsaftercardiacsurgerycomparisonwithtraditionalprognosticmodels