Cargando…

Is it morally permissible for general practitioners to disclose their opinion on a woman’s decision on abortion?

BACKGROUND: This paper considers ethical dilemmas arising where a patient asks their General Practitioner for advice and their personal opinion regarding whether or not to have an abortion. Patients often seek their General Practitioner’s advice regarding treatments and procedures, which may occasio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aung, Lynnlette, Knight, Selena
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7068960/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32164682
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-020-0464-9
_version_ 1783505680949313536
author Aung, Lynnlette
Knight, Selena
author_facet Aung, Lynnlette
Knight, Selena
author_sort Aung, Lynnlette
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This paper considers ethical dilemmas arising where a patient asks their General Practitioner for advice and their personal opinion regarding whether or not to have an abortion. Patients often seek their General Practitioner’s advice regarding treatments and procedures, which may occasionally lead to the General Practitioner facing a difficult dilemma of whether to share their personal opinion with their patient. As General Practitioners are more accessible as the first point of contact for patients and often have a closer relationship with them, they may be particularly exposed to such situations. Additionally, the significance of abortion as a sensitive topic and the fact the General Practitioner may have their own personal viewpoint on its morality may make it particularly difficult for them to know how to respond to such a request. MAIN TEXT: This paper explores the difficulties arising in such a situation and considers whether it could ever be ethically justifiable for General Practitioners to express their opinions on such a matter. We consider the duties of a doctor, and highlight the need for clearer guidance for healthcare professionals on managing tensions in their professional boundaries between their personal moral views and their professional responsibilities. A range of ethical viewpoints are considered to explore how a doctor might ap, in particular the principle of autonomy, virtue ethics, and consequentialism. CONCLUSIONS: This article recognises that a General Practitioner in a situation such as this faces many ethical challenges. We propose that offering their opinion to the patient where specifically requested may be morally justifiable. A virtue ethics approach in particular requires that the General Practitioner applies practical wisdom to make this decision, and where they do disclose their opinion ensure this is done so in such a manner that it does not harm the patient and promotes flourishing. We encourage GPs and other healthcare professionals to consider their own moral perspectives on sensitive issues such as abortion, and reflect on how their moral viewpoints have the potential to influence their practice. In doing so, we hope clinicians can be better should they be faced with a situation such as this.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7068960
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70689602020-03-18 Is it morally permissible for general practitioners to disclose their opinion on a woman’s decision on abortion? Aung, Lynnlette Knight, Selena BMC Med Ethics Debate BACKGROUND: This paper considers ethical dilemmas arising where a patient asks their General Practitioner for advice and their personal opinion regarding whether or not to have an abortion. Patients often seek their General Practitioner’s advice regarding treatments and procedures, which may occasionally lead to the General Practitioner facing a difficult dilemma of whether to share their personal opinion with their patient. As General Practitioners are more accessible as the first point of contact for patients and often have a closer relationship with them, they may be particularly exposed to such situations. Additionally, the significance of abortion as a sensitive topic and the fact the General Practitioner may have their own personal viewpoint on its morality may make it particularly difficult for them to know how to respond to such a request. MAIN TEXT: This paper explores the difficulties arising in such a situation and considers whether it could ever be ethically justifiable for General Practitioners to express their opinions on such a matter. We consider the duties of a doctor, and highlight the need for clearer guidance for healthcare professionals on managing tensions in their professional boundaries between their personal moral views and their professional responsibilities. A range of ethical viewpoints are considered to explore how a doctor might ap, in particular the principle of autonomy, virtue ethics, and consequentialism. CONCLUSIONS: This article recognises that a General Practitioner in a situation such as this faces many ethical challenges. We propose that offering their opinion to the patient where specifically requested may be morally justifiable. A virtue ethics approach in particular requires that the General Practitioner applies practical wisdom to make this decision, and where they do disclose their opinion ensure this is done so in such a manner that it does not harm the patient and promotes flourishing. We encourage GPs and other healthcare professionals to consider their own moral perspectives on sensitive issues such as abortion, and reflect on how their moral viewpoints have the potential to influence their practice. In doing so, we hope clinicians can be better should they be faced with a situation such as this. BioMed Central 2020-03-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7068960/ /pubmed/32164682 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-020-0464-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Debate
Aung, Lynnlette
Knight, Selena
Is it morally permissible for general practitioners to disclose their opinion on a woman’s decision on abortion?
title Is it morally permissible for general practitioners to disclose their opinion on a woman’s decision on abortion?
title_full Is it morally permissible for general practitioners to disclose their opinion on a woman’s decision on abortion?
title_fullStr Is it morally permissible for general practitioners to disclose their opinion on a woman’s decision on abortion?
title_full_unstemmed Is it morally permissible for general practitioners to disclose their opinion on a woman’s decision on abortion?
title_short Is it morally permissible for general practitioners to disclose their opinion on a woman’s decision on abortion?
title_sort is it morally permissible for general practitioners to disclose their opinion on a woman’s decision on abortion?
topic Debate
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7068960/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32164682
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-020-0464-9
work_keys_str_mv AT aunglynnlette isitmorallypermissibleforgeneralpractitionerstodisclosetheiropiniononawomansdecisiononabortion
AT knightselena isitmorallypermissibleforgeneralpractitionerstodisclosetheiropiniononawomansdecisiononabortion