Cargando…
Outcomes of patients with initially locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma who did not benefit from resection: a prospective cohort study
BACKGROUND: The current study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of patients with unresectable non-metastatic locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (LAPA) who did not benefit from resection considering the treatment strategy in the clinical settings. METHODS: Between 2010 and 2017, a total of 234 p...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7068994/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32164564 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-020-6690-1 |
_version_ | 1783505688628035584 |
---|---|
author | Garnier, Jonathan Ewald, Jacques Marchese, Ugo Gilabert, Marine Launay, Simon Moureau-Zabotto, Laurence Poizat, Flora Giovannini, Marc Delpero, Jean-Robert Turrini, Olivier |
author_facet | Garnier, Jonathan Ewald, Jacques Marchese, Ugo Gilabert, Marine Launay, Simon Moureau-Zabotto, Laurence Poizat, Flora Giovannini, Marc Delpero, Jean-Robert Turrini, Olivier |
author_sort | Garnier, Jonathan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The current study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of patients with unresectable non-metastatic locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (LAPA) who did not benefit from resection considering the treatment strategy in the clinical settings. METHODS: Between 2010 and 2017, a total of 234 patients underwent induction chemotherapy for LAPA that could not be treated with surgery. After oncologic restaging, continuous chemotherapy or chemoradiation (CRT) was decided for patients without metastatic disease. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to determine overall survival (OS), and the Wilcoxon test to compare survival curves. Multivariate analysis was performed using the stepwise logistic regression method. RESULTS: FOLFIRINOX was the most common induction regimen (168 patients, 72%), with a median of 6 chemotherapy cycles and resulted in higher OS, compared to gemcitabine (19 vs. 16 months, hazard ratio (HR) = 1.2, 95% confidence interval: 0.86–1.6, P = .03). However, no difference was observed after adjusting for age (≤75 years) and performance status score (0–1). At restaging, 187 patients (80%) had non-metastatic disease: CRT was administered to 126 patients (67%) while chemotherapy was continued in 61 (33%). Patients who received CRT had characteristics comparable to those who continued with chemotherapy, with similar OS. They also had longer progression-free survival (median 13.3 vs. 9.6 months, HR = 1.38, 95% confidence interval: 1–1.9, P < .01) and limited short-term treatment-related toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: The median survival of patients who could not undergo surgery was 19 months. Hence, CRT should not be eliminated as a treatment option and may be useful as a part of optimised sequential chemotherapy for both local and metastatic disease. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7068994 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70689942020-03-18 Outcomes of patients with initially locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma who did not benefit from resection: a prospective cohort study Garnier, Jonathan Ewald, Jacques Marchese, Ugo Gilabert, Marine Launay, Simon Moureau-Zabotto, Laurence Poizat, Flora Giovannini, Marc Delpero, Jean-Robert Turrini, Olivier BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: The current study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of patients with unresectable non-metastatic locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (LAPA) who did not benefit from resection considering the treatment strategy in the clinical settings. METHODS: Between 2010 and 2017, a total of 234 patients underwent induction chemotherapy for LAPA that could not be treated with surgery. After oncologic restaging, continuous chemotherapy or chemoradiation (CRT) was decided for patients without metastatic disease. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to determine overall survival (OS), and the Wilcoxon test to compare survival curves. Multivariate analysis was performed using the stepwise logistic regression method. RESULTS: FOLFIRINOX was the most common induction regimen (168 patients, 72%), with a median of 6 chemotherapy cycles and resulted in higher OS, compared to gemcitabine (19 vs. 16 months, hazard ratio (HR) = 1.2, 95% confidence interval: 0.86–1.6, P = .03). However, no difference was observed after adjusting for age (≤75 years) and performance status score (0–1). At restaging, 187 patients (80%) had non-metastatic disease: CRT was administered to 126 patients (67%) while chemotherapy was continued in 61 (33%). Patients who received CRT had characteristics comparable to those who continued with chemotherapy, with similar OS. They also had longer progression-free survival (median 13.3 vs. 9.6 months, HR = 1.38, 95% confidence interval: 1–1.9, P < .01) and limited short-term treatment-related toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: The median survival of patients who could not undergo surgery was 19 months. Hence, CRT should not be eliminated as a treatment option and may be useful as a part of optimised sequential chemotherapy for both local and metastatic disease. BioMed Central 2020-03-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7068994/ /pubmed/32164564 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-020-6690-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Garnier, Jonathan Ewald, Jacques Marchese, Ugo Gilabert, Marine Launay, Simon Moureau-Zabotto, Laurence Poizat, Flora Giovannini, Marc Delpero, Jean-Robert Turrini, Olivier Outcomes of patients with initially locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma who did not benefit from resection: a prospective cohort study |
title | Outcomes of patients with initially locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma who did not benefit from resection: a prospective cohort study |
title_full | Outcomes of patients with initially locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma who did not benefit from resection: a prospective cohort study |
title_fullStr | Outcomes of patients with initially locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma who did not benefit from resection: a prospective cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | Outcomes of patients with initially locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma who did not benefit from resection: a prospective cohort study |
title_short | Outcomes of patients with initially locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma who did not benefit from resection: a prospective cohort study |
title_sort | outcomes of patients with initially locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma who did not benefit from resection: a prospective cohort study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7068994/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32164564 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-020-6690-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT garnierjonathan outcomesofpatientswithinitiallylocallyadvancedpancreaticadenocarcinomawhodidnotbenefitfromresectionaprospectivecohortstudy AT ewaldjacques outcomesofpatientswithinitiallylocallyadvancedpancreaticadenocarcinomawhodidnotbenefitfromresectionaprospectivecohortstudy AT marcheseugo outcomesofpatientswithinitiallylocallyadvancedpancreaticadenocarcinomawhodidnotbenefitfromresectionaprospectivecohortstudy AT gilabertmarine outcomesofpatientswithinitiallylocallyadvancedpancreaticadenocarcinomawhodidnotbenefitfromresectionaprospectivecohortstudy AT launaysimon outcomesofpatientswithinitiallylocallyadvancedpancreaticadenocarcinomawhodidnotbenefitfromresectionaprospectivecohortstudy AT moureauzabottolaurence outcomesofpatientswithinitiallylocallyadvancedpancreaticadenocarcinomawhodidnotbenefitfromresectionaprospectivecohortstudy AT poizatflora outcomesofpatientswithinitiallylocallyadvancedpancreaticadenocarcinomawhodidnotbenefitfromresectionaprospectivecohortstudy AT giovanninimarc outcomesofpatientswithinitiallylocallyadvancedpancreaticadenocarcinomawhodidnotbenefitfromresectionaprospectivecohortstudy AT delperojeanrobert outcomesofpatientswithinitiallylocallyadvancedpancreaticadenocarcinomawhodidnotbenefitfromresectionaprospectivecohortstudy AT turriniolivier outcomesofpatientswithinitiallylocallyadvancedpancreaticadenocarcinomawhodidnotbenefitfromresectionaprospectivecohortstudy |