Cargando…

Comparison of predictive models for hepatitis C co-infection among HIV patients in Cambodia

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a major global health problem. WHO guidelines recommend screening all people living with HIV for hepatitis C. Considering the limited resources for health in low and middle income countries, targeted HCV screening is potentially a more feasible screen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Buyze, Jozefien, Weggheleire, Anja De, van Griensven, Johan, Lynen, Lutgarde
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7069185/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32164581
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-020-4909-z
_version_ 1783505731498016768
author Buyze, Jozefien
Weggheleire, Anja De
van Griensven, Johan
Lynen, Lutgarde
author_facet Buyze, Jozefien
Weggheleire, Anja De
van Griensven, Johan
Lynen, Lutgarde
author_sort Buyze, Jozefien
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a major global health problem. WHO guidelines recommend screening all people living with HIV for hepatitis C. Considering the limited resources for health in low and middle income countries, targeted HCV screening is potentially a more feasible screening strategy for many HIV cohorts. Hence there is an interest in developing clinician-friendly tools for selecting subgroups of HIV patients for whom HCV testing should be prioritized. Several statistical methods have been developed to predict a binary outcome. Multiple studies have compared the performance of different predictive models, but results were inconsistent. METHODS: A cross-sectional HCV diagnostic study was conducted in the HIV cohort of Sihanouk Hospital Center of Hope in Phnom Penh, Cambodia. We compared the performance of logistic regression, Spiegelhalter-Knill-Jones and CART to predict Hepatitis C co-infection in this cohort. We estimated the number of HCV co-infections that would be missed. To correct for over-optimism, the leave-one-out bootstrap estimator was used for estimating this quantity. RESULTS: Logistic regression misses the fewest HCV co-infections (8%), but would still refer 98% of HIV patients for HCV testing. Spiegelhalter-Knill-Jones (SKJ) and CART respectively miss 12% and 29% of HCV co-infections but would only refer about 30% for HCV testing. CONCLUSIONS: In our dataset, logistic regression has the highest log-likelihood and smallest proportions of HCV co-infections missed but Spiegelhalter-Knill-Jones has the highest area under the ROC curve. The likelihood ratios estimated by Spiegelhalter-Knill-Jones might be easier to interpret for clinicians than odds ratios estimated by logistic regression or the decision tree from CART. CART is the most flexible method, and no model has to be specified regarding presence of interactions and form of the relationship between outcome and predictor variables.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7069185
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70691852020-03-18 Comparison of predictive models for hepatitis C co-infection among HIV patients in Cambodia Buyze, Jozefien Weggheleire, Anja De van Griensven, Johan Lynen, Lutgarde BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a major global health problem. WHO guidelines recommend screening all people living with HIV for hepatitis C. Considering the limited resources for health in low and middle income countries, targeted HCV screening is potentially a more feasible screening strategy for many HIV cohorts. Hence there is an interest in developing clinician-friendly tools for selecting subgroups of HIV patients for whom HCV testing should be prioritized. Several statistical methods have been developed to predict a binary outcome. Multiple studies have compared the performance of different predictive models, but results were inconsistent. METHODS: A cross-sectional HCV diagnostic study was conducted in the HIV cohort of Sihanouk Hospital Center of Hope in Phnom Penh, Cambodia. We compared the performance of logistic regression, Spiegelhalter-Knill-Jones and CART to predict Hepatitis C co-infection in this cohort. We estimated the number of HCV co-infections that would be missed. To correct for over-optimism, the leave-one-out bootstrap estimator was used for estimating this quantity. RESULTS: Logistic regression misses the fewest HCV co-infections (8%), but would still refer 98% of HIV patients for HCV testing. Spiegelhalter-Knill-Jones (SKJ) and CART respectively miss 12% and 29% of HCV co-infections but would only refer about 30% for HCV testing. CONCLUSIONS: In our dataset, logistic regression has the highest log-likelihood and smallest proportions of HCV co-infections missed but Spiegelhalter-Knill-Jones has the highest area under the ROC curve. The likelihood ratios estimated by Spiegelhalter-Knill-Jones might be easier to interpret for clinicians than odds ratios estimated by logistic regression or the decision tree from CART. CART is the most flexible method, and no model has to be specified regarding presence of interactions and form of the relationship between outcome and predictor variables. BioMed Central 2020-03-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7069185/ /pubmed/32164581 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-020-4909-z Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Buyze, Jozefien
Weggheleire, Anja De
van Griensven, Johan
Lynen, Lutgarde
Comparison of predictive models for hepatitis C co-infection among HIV patients in Cambodia
title Comparison of predictive models for hepatitis C co-infection among HIV patients in Cambodia
title_full Comparison of predictive models for hepatitis C co-infection among HIV patients in Cambodia
title_fullStr Comparison of predictive models for hepatitis C co-infection among HIV patients in Cambodia
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of predictive models for hepatitis C co-infection among HIV patients in Cambodia
title_short Comparison of predictive models for hepatitis C co-infection among HIV patients in Cambodia
title_sort comparison of predictive models for hepatitis c co-infection among hiv patients in cambodia
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7069185/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32164581
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-020-4909-z
work_keys_str_mv AT buyzejozefien comparisonofpredictivemodelsforhepatitisccoinfectionamonghivpatientsincambodia
AT weggheleireanjade comparisonofpredictivemodelsforhepatitisccoinfectionamonghivpatientsincambodia
AT vangriensvenjohan comparisonofpredictivemodelsforhepatitisccoinfectionamonghivpatientsincambodia
AT lynenlutgarde comparisonofpredictivemodelsforhepatitisccoinfectionamonghivpatientsincambodia