Cargando…

Prediction of gestational age with symphysis-fundal height and estimated uterine volume in a pregnancy cohort in Sylhet, Bangladesh

OBJECTIVE: To improve the accuracy of the prediction of gestational age (GA) before birth with the standardised measurement of symphysis-fundal height (SFH), estimation of uterine volume, and statistical modelling including maternal anthropometrics and other factors. DESIGN: Prospective pregnancy co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Anne C C, Whelan, Rachel, Bably, Nazmun Nahar, Schaeffer, Lauren E, Rahman, Sayedur, Ahmed, Salahuddin, Moin, Syed Mamun Ibne, Begum, Nazma, Quaiyum, Mohammad Abdul, Rosner, Bernard, Litch, James A, Baqui, Abdullah H, Wylie, Blair J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7069288/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32169927
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034942
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: To improve the accuracy of the prediction of gestational age (GA) before birth with the standardised measurement of symphysis-fundal height (SFH), estimation of uterine volume, and statistical modelling including maternal anthropometrics and other factors. DESIGN: Prospective pregnancy cohort study. SETTING: Rural communities in Sylhet, Bangladesh. PARTICIPANTS: 1516 women with singleton pregnancies with early pregnancy ultrasound dating (<20 weeks); 1486 completed follow-up. METHODS: SFH and abdominal girth were measured at subsequent antenatal care (ANC) visits by community health workers at 24 to 28, 32 to 36, and/or >37 weeks gestation. An estimated uterine volume (EUV) was calculated from these measures. Data on pregnancy characteristics and other maternal anthropometrics were also collected. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE: GA at subsequent ANC visits, as defined by early ultrasound dating. RESULTS: 1486 (98%) women had at least one subsequent ANC visit, 1102 (74%) women had two subsequent ANC visits, and 748 (50%) had three visits. Using the common clinical practice of approximating the GA (in weeks) with the SFH measurement (cm), SFH systematically underestimated GA in late pregnancy (mean difference −4.4 weeks, 95% limits of agreement −12.5 to 3.7). For the classification of GA <28 weeks, SFH <26 cm had 85% sensitivity and 81% specificity; and for GA <34 weeks, SFH <29 cm had 83% sensitivity and 71% specificity. EUV had similar diagnostic accuracy. Despite rigorous statistical modelling of SFH, accounting for repeated longitudinal measurements and additional predictors, the best model without including a known last menstrual period predicted 95% of pregnancy dates within ±7.4 weeks of early ultrasound dating. CONCLUSIONS: We were unable to predict GA with a high degree of accuracy before birth using maternal anthropometric measures and other available maternal characteristics. Efforts to improve GA dating in low- and middle-income countries before birth should focus on increasing coverage and training of ultrasonography. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01572532