Cargando…

Citation Classics on Dental Caries: A Systematic Review

Objective  A systematic search was performed for the identification and analysis of the 100 most often cited articles on dental caries and to highlight the changing trends in the field of dentistry over time. Materials and Methods  The search was performed without any restriction on the study design...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Arshad, Anas Imran, Ahmad, Paras, Dummer, Paul M.H., Alam, Mohammad Khursheed, Asif, Jawaad Ahmed, Mahmood, Zuliani, Rahman, Normastura Abd, Mamat, Noraida
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd. 2020
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7069738/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32189321
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1703419
Descripción
Sumario:Objective  A systematic search was performed for the identification and analysis of the 100 most often cited articles on dental caries and to highlight the changing trends in the field of dentistry over time. Materials and Methods  The search was performed without any restriction on the study design, publication year, or language using the Web of Science (WoS) group of Clarivate Analytics enabling the search through “All Databases.” Based on the citation count as available in WoS, the articles were sorted in a descending manner. Information regarding each article was then extracted, which included its authorship, counts of citation (in other databases), citation density, current citation index (2019), publication year, country of publication, journal of article, evidence level based on study design, and keywords description. Results  The count of citation for each article varied in each database, that is, 175 to 2,003 in WoS, 89 to 1,981 in Scopus, and 126 to 3,492 when searched in Google Scholar. The highest number of articles ( n = 10) related to dental caries were published in 2004. A total of 301 authors made valuable contributions to this field, out of which J.D. Featherstone had coauthored 6 articles. A significant negative correlation ( p < 0.01) was found between the age of the article and the citation density ( r =–0.545). However, a nonsignificant correlation ( p = 0.952) occurred between the age of publication and the citation count ( r = 0.006). Conclusion  The results of this systematic review provide a critical appraisal of the context underpinning scientific developments in the field of dental caries and also highlighted trends in clinical management and research.