Cargando…
Effect of A-PRF Application on Palatal Wound Healing after Free Gingival Graft Harvesting: A Prospective Randomized Study
Objective The aim of this study was to investigate the healing effect of advanced platelet-rich fibrin (A-PRF) clot membranes in palatal wounds, resulting from free gingival graft (FGG) harvesting, on the reepithelization rate and on the pain experience after surgery. Materials and Methods Twenty-...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd.
2020
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7069756/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32168533 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1702259 |
_version_ | 1783505840318185472 |
---|---|
author | Sousa, Filipa Machado, Vanessa Botelho, João Proença, Luís Mendes, José João Alves, Ricardo |
author_facet | Sousa, Filipa Machado, Vanessa Botelho, João Proença, Luís Mendes, José João Alves, Ricardo |
author_sort | Sousa, Filipa |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective The aim of this study was to investigate the healing effect of advanced platelet-rich fibrin (A-PRF) clot membranes in palatal wounds, resulting from free gingival graft (FGG) harvesting, on the reepithelization rate and on the pain experience after surgery. Materials and Methods Twenty-five patients requiring FGG have participated in this prospective cohort study. After FGG harvesting, the test group ( n = 14) received A-PRF clot membranes at the palatal wound and the control group ( n = 11) received a gelatin sponge. Epithelialization rate of the palatal wound, wound healing area, correspondent percentage of reduction, and postsurgical pain experience were assessed at 2, 7, 14, 30, and 90 days. Results A-PRF group had higher palatal wound reduction than the control group, at 7, 14, and 30 days of follow-up. The highest difference between the groups was attained at 30 days (91.5% for A-PRF vs. 59.0% control group). At 14 days, a significant difference in the proportion of patients showing total epithelization was found: 64.3% for A-PRF versus 9.1% for the control group. At 90 days, both groups showed total recovery. The control group experienced higher pain level and discomfort until the 14th day, being notably higher on the second day. Conclusion The results suggest that A-PRF membranes haste the healing process, and promote greater reduction along the recovery period and less painful postoperative period. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7069756 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70697562020-03-18 Effect of A-PRF Application on Palatal Wound Healing after Free Gingival Graft Harvesting: A Prospective Randomized Study Sousa, Filipa Machado, Vanessa Botelho, João Proença, Luís Mendes, José João Alves, Ricardo Eur J Dent Objective The aim of this study was to investigate the healing effect of advanced platelet-rich fibrin (A-PRF) clot membranes in palatal wounds, resulting from free gingival graft (FGG) harvesting, on the reepithelization rate and on the pain experience after surgery. Materials and Methods Twenty-five patients requiring FGG have participated in this prospective cohort study. After FGG harvesting, the test group ( n = 14) received A-PRF clot membranes at the palatal wound and the control group ( n = 11) received a gelatin sponge. Epithelialization rate of the palatal wound, wound healing area, correspondent percentage of reduction, and postsurgical pain experience were assessed at 2, 7, 14, 30, and 90 days. Results A-PRF group had higher palatal wound reduction than the control group, at 7, 14, and 30 days of follow-up. The highest difference between the groups was attained at 30 days (91.5% for A-PRF vs. 59.0% control group). At 14 days, a significant difference in the proportion of patients showing total epithelization was found: 64.3% for A-PRF versus 9.1% for the control group. At 90 days, both groups showed total recovery. The control group experienced higher pain level and discomfort until the 14th day, being notably higher on the second day. Conclusion The results suggest that A-PRF membranes haste the healing process, and promote greater reduction along the recovery period and less painful postoperative period. Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd. 2020-02 2020-03-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7069756/ /pubmed/32168533 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1702259 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Sousa, Filipa Machado, Vanessa Botelho, João Proença, Luís Mendes, José João Alves, Ricardo Effect of A-PRF Application on Palatal Wound Healing after Free Gingival Graft Harvesting: A Prospective Randomized Study |
title | Effect of A-PRF Application on Palatal Wound Healing after Free Gingival Graft Harvesting: A Prospective Randomized Study |
title_full | Effect of A-PRF Application on Palatal Wound Healing after Free Gingival Graft Harvesting: A Prospective Randomized Study |
title_fullStr | Effect of A-PRF Application on Palatal Wound Healing after Free Gingival Graft Harvesting: A Prospective Randomized Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Effect of A-PRF Application on Palatal Wound Healing after Free Gingival Graft Harvesting: A Prospective Randomized Study |
title_short | Effect of A-PRF Application on Palatal Wound Healing after Free Gingival Graft Harvesting: A Prospective Randomized Study |
title_sort | effect of a-prf application on palatal wound healing after free gingival graft harvesting: a prospective randomized study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7069756/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32168533 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1702259 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sousafilipa effectofaprfapplicationonpalatalwoundhealingafterfreegingivalgraftharvestingaprospectiverandomizedstudy AT machadovanessa effectofaprfapplicationonpalatalwoundhealingafterfreegingivalgraftharvestingaprospectiverandomizedstudy AT botelhojoao effectofaprfapplicationonpalatalwoundhealingafterfreegingivalgraftharvestingaprospectiverandomizedstudy AT proencaluis effectofaprfapplicationonpalatalwoundhealingafterfreegingivalgraftharvestingaprospectiverandomizedstudy AT mendesjosejoao effectofaprfapplicationonpalatalwoundhealingafterfreegingivalgraftharvestingaprospectiverandomizedstudy AT alvesricardo effectofaprfapplicationonpalatalwoundhealingafterfreegingivalgraftharvestingaprospectiverandomizedstudy |