Cargando…

Effect of A-PRF Application on Palatal Wound Healing after Free Gingival Graft Harvesting: A Prospective Randomized Study

Objective  The aim of this study was to investigate the healing effect of advanced platelet-rich fibrin (A-PRF) clot membranes in palatal wounds, resulting from free gingival graft (FGG) harvesting, on the reepithelization rate and on the pain experience after surgery. Materials and Methods  Twenty-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sousa, Filipa, Machado, Vanessa, Botelho, João, Proença, Luís, Mendes, José João, Alves, Ricardo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd. 2020
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7069756/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32168533
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1702259
_version_ 1783505840318185472
author Sousa, Filipa
Machado, Vanessa
Botelho, João
Proença, Luís
Mendes, José João
Alves, Ricardo
author_facet Sousa, Filipa
Machado, Vanessa
Botelho, João
Proença, Luís
Mendes, José João
Alves, Ricardo
author_sort Sousa, Filipa
collection PubMed
description Objective  The aim of this study was to investigate the healing effect of advanced platelet-rich fibrin (A-PRF) clot membranes in palatal wounds, resulting from free gingival graft (FGG) harvesting, on the reepithelization rate and on the pain experience after surgery. Materials and Methods  Twenty-five patients requiring FGG have participated in this prospective cohort study. After FGG harvesting, the test group ( n = 14) received A-PRF clot membranes at the palatal wound and the control group ( n = 11) received a gelatin sponge. Epithelialization rate of the palatal wound, wound healing area, correspondent percentage of reduction, and postsurgical pain experience were assessed at 2, 7, 14, 30, and 90 days. Results  A-PRF group had higher palatal wound reduction than the control group, at 7, 14, and 30 days of follow-up. The highest difference between the groups was attained at 30 days (91.5% for A-PRF vs. 59.0% control group). At 14 days, a significant difference in the proportion of patients showing total epithelization was found: 64.3% for A-PRF versus 9.1% for the control group. At 90 days, both groups showed total recovery. The control group experienced higher pain level and discomfort until the 14th day, being notably higher on the second day. Conclusion  The results suggest that A-PRF membranes haste the healing process, and promote greater reduction along the recovery period and less painful postoperative period.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7069756
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70697562020-03-18 Effect of A-PRF Application on Palatal Wound Healing after Free Gingival Graft Harvesting: A Prospective Randomized Study Sousa, Filipa Machado, Vanessa Botelho, João Proença, Luís Mendes, José João Alves, Ricardo Eur J Dent Objective  The aim of this study was to investigate the healing effect of advanced platelet-rich fibrin (A-PRF) clot membranes in palatal wounds, resulting from free gingival graft (FGG) harvesting, on the reepithelization rate and on the pain experience after surgery. Materials and Methods  Twenty-five patients requiring FGG have participated in this prospective cohort study. After FGG harvesting, the test group ( n = 14) received A-PRF clot membranes at the palatal wound and the control group ( n = 11) received a gelatin sponge. Epithelialization rate of the palatal wound, wound healing area, correspondent percentage of reduction, and postsurgical pain experience were assessed at 2, 7, 14, 30, and 90 days. Results  A-PRF group had higher palatal wound reduction than the control group, at 7, 14, and 30 days of follow-up. The highest difference between the groups was attained at 30 days (91.5% for A-PRF vs. 59.0% control group). At 14 days, a significant difference in the proportion of patients showing total epithelization was found: 64.3% for A-PRF versus 9.1% for the control group. At 90 days, both groups showed total recovery. The control group experienced higher pain level and discomfort until the 14th day, being notably higher on the second day. Conclusion  The results suggest that A-PRF membranes haste the healing process, and promote greater reduction along the recovery period and less painful postoperative period. Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd. 2020-02 2020-03-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7069756/ /pubmed/32168533 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1702259 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Sousa, Filipa
Machado, Vanessa
Botelho, João
Proença, Luís
Mendes, José João
Alves, Ricardo
Effect of A-PRF Application on Palatal Wound Healing after Free Gingival Graft Harvesting: A Prospective Randomized Study
title Effect of A-PRF Application on Palatal Wound Healing after Free Gingival Graft Harvesting: A Prospective Randomized Study
title_full Effect of A-PRF Application on Palatal Wound Healing after Free Gingival Graft Harvesting: A Prospective Randomized Study
title_fullStr Effect of A-PRF Application on Palatal Wound Healing after Free Gingival Graft Harvesting: A Prospective Randomized Study
title_full_unstemmed Effect of A-PRF Application on Palatal Wound Healing after Free Gingival Graft Harvesting: A Prospective Randomized Study
title_short Effect of A-PRF Application on Palatal Wound Healing after Free Gingival Graft Harvesting: A Prospective Randomized Study
title_sort effect of a-prf application on palatal wound healing after free gingival graft harvesting: a prospective randomized study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7069756/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32168533
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1702259
work_keys_str_mv AT sousafilipa effectofaprfapplicationonpalatalwoundhealingafterfreegingivalgraftharvestingaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT machadovanessa effectofaprfapplicationonpalatalwoundhealingafterfreegingivalgraftharvestingaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT botelhojoao effectofaprfapplicationonpalatalwoundhealingafterfreegingivalgraftharvestingaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT proencaluis effectofaprfapplicationonpalatalwoundhealingafterfreegingivalgraftharvestingaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT mendesjosejoao effectofaprfapplicationonpalatalwoundhealingafterfreegingivalgraftharvestingaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT alvesricardo effectofaprfapplicationonpalatalwoundhealingafterfreegingivalgraftharvestingaprospectiverandomizedstudy