Cargando…
Thrombolysis in Stroke With Unknown Onset Based on Non‐Contrast Computerized Tomography (TRUST CT)
BACKGROUND: Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in wake‐up stroke (WUS) or stroke with unknown onset (SUO) has been recently proven to be safe and effective using advanced neuroimaging (magnetic resonance imaging or computerized tomography‐perfusion) for patient selection. However, in most of the thrombo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7070213/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32067594 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.119.014265 |
_version_ | 1783505923078094848 |
---|---|
author | Sykora, Marek Kellert, Lars Michel, Patrik Eskandari, Ashraf Feil, Katharina Rémi, Jan Ferrari, Julia Krebs, Stefan Lang, Wilfried Serles, Wolfgang Siarnik, Pavel Turcani, Peter Kovacik, Michal Bender, Benjamin Mengel, Annerose Poli, Khouloud Poli, Sven |
author_facet | Sykora, Marek Kellert, Lars Michel, Patrik Eskandari, Ashraf Feil, Katharina Rémi, Jan Ferrari, Julia Krebs, Stefan Lang, Wilfried Serles, Wolfgang Siarnik, Pavel Turcani, Peter Kovacik, Michal Bender, Benjamin Mengel, Annerose Poli, Khouloud Poli, Sven |
author_sort | Sykora, Marek |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in wake‐up stroke (WUS) or stroke with unknown onset (SUO) has been recently proven to be safe and effective using advanced neuroimaging (magnetic resonance imaging or computerized tomography‐perfusion) for patient selection. However, in most of the thrombolyzing centers advanced neuroimaging is not instantly available. We hypothesize that pragmatic non‐contrast computed tomography‐based IVT in WUS/SUO may be feasible and safe. METHODS AND RESULTS: TRUST‐CT (Thrombolysis in Stroke With Unknown Onset Based on Non‐Contrast Computerized Tomography) is an international multicenter registry‐based study. WUS/SUO patients undergoing non‐contrast computed tomography‐based IVT with National Institute of Health Stroke Scale ≥4 and initial Alberta Stroke Program Early Computerized Tomography score ≥7 were included and compared with propensity score matched non‐thrombolyzed WUS/SUO controls. Primary end point was the incidence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage; secondary end points included 24‐hour National Institute of Health Stroke Scale improvement of ≥4 and modified Rankin Scale at 90 days. One hundred and seventeen WUS/SUO patients treated with non‐contrast computed tomography‐based IVT were included. As compared with 112 controls, the median admission National Institute of Health Stroke Scale was 10 and the median Alberta Stroke Program Early Computerized Tomography score was 10 in both groups. Four (3.4%) IVT patients and one control patient (0.9%) suffered symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (adjusted odds ratio 7.9, 95% CI 0.65–96, P=0.1). A decrease of ≥4 National Institute of Health Stroke Scale points was observed in 67 (57.3%) of IVT patients as compared with 25 (22.3%) in controls (adjusted odds ratio 5.8, CI 3.0–11.2, P<0.001). A months, 39 (33.3%) IVT patients reached a modified Rankin Scale score of 0 or 1 versus 23 (20.5%) controls (adjusted odds ratio 1.94, CI 1.0–3.76, P=0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Non‐contrast computed tomography‐based thrombolysis in WUS/SUO seems feasible and safe and may be effective. Randomized prospective comparisons are warranted. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/. Unique identifier: NCT03634748. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7070213 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70702132020-03-17 Thrombolysis in Stroke With Unknown Onset Based on Non‐Contrast Computerized Tomography (TRUST CT) Sykora, Marek Kellert, Lars Michel, Patrik Eskandari, Ashraf Feil, Katharina Rémi, Jan Ferrari, Julia Krebs, Stefan Lang, Wilfried Serles, Wolfgang Siarnik, Pavel Turcani, Peter Kovacik, Michal Bender, Benjamin Mengel, Annerose Poli, Khouloud Poli, Sven J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in wake‐up stroke (WUS) or stroke with unknown onset (SUO) has been recently proven to be safe and effective using advanced neuroimaging (magnetic resonance imaging or computerized tomography‐perfusion) for patient selection. However, in most of the thrombolyzing centers advanced neuroimaging is not instantly available. We hypothesize that pragmatic non‐contrast computed tomography‐based IVT in WUS/SUO may be feasible and safe. METHODS AND RESULTS: TRUST‐CT (Thrombolysis in Stroke With Unknown Onset Based on Non‐Contrast Computerized Tomography) is an international multicenter registry‐based study. WUS/SUO patients undergoing non‐contrast computed tomography‐based IVT with National Institute of Health Stroke Scale ≥4 and initial Alberta Stroke Program Early Computerized Tomography score ≥7 were included and compared with propensity score matched non‐thrombolyzed WUS/SUO controls. Primary end point was the incidence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage; secondary end points included 24‐hour National Institute of Health Stroke Scale improvement of ≥4 and modified Rankin Scale at 90 days. One hundred and seventeen WUS/SUO patients treated with non‐contrast computed tomography‐based IVT were included. As compared with 112 controls, the median admission National Institute of Health Stroke Scale was 10 and the median Alberta Stroke Program Early Computerized Tomography score was 10 in both groups. Four (3.4%) IVT patients and one control patient (0.9%) suffered symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (adjusted odds ratio 7.9, 95% CI 0.65–96, P=0.1). A decrease of ≥4 National Institute of Health Stroke Scale points was observed in 67 (57.3%) of IVT patients as compared with 25 (22.3%) in controls (adjusted odds ratio 5.8, CI 3.0–11.2, P<0.001). A months, 39 (33.3%) IVT patients reached a modified Rankin Scale score of 0 or 1 versus 23 (20.5%) controls (adjusted odds ratio 1.94, CI 1.0–3.76, P=0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Non‐contrast computed tomography‐based thrombolysis in WUS/SUO seems feasible and safe and may be effective. Randomized prospective comparisons are warranted. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/. Unique identifier: NCT03634748. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-02-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7070213/ /pubmed/32067594 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.119.014265 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Sykora, Marek Kellert, Lars Michel, Patrik Eskandari, Ashraf Feil, Katharina Rémi, Jan Ferrari, Julia Krebs, Stefan Lang, Wilfried Serles, Wolfgang Siarnik, Pavel Turcani, Peter Kovacik, Michal Bender, Benjamin Mengel, Annerose Poli, Khouloud Poli, Sven Thrombolysis in Stroke With Unknown Onset Based on Non‐Contrast Computerized Tomography (TRUST CT) |
title | Thrombolysis in Stroke With Unknown Onset Based on Non‐Contrast Computerized Tomography (TRUST CT) |
title_full | Thrombolysis in Stroke With Unknown Onset Based on Non‐Contrast Computerized Tomography (TRUST CT) |
title_fullStr | Thrombolysis in Stroke With Unknown Onset Based on Non‐Contrast Computerized Tomography (TRUST CT) |
title_full_unstemmed | Thrombolysis in Stroke With Unknown Onset Based on Non‐Contrast Computerized Tomography (TRUST CT) |
title_short | Thrombolysis in Stroke With Unknown Onset Based on Non‐Contrast Computerized Tomography (TRUST CT) |
title_sort | thrombolysis in stroke with unknown onset based on non‐contrast computerized tomography (trust ct) |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7070213/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32067594 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.119.014265 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sykoramarek thrombolysisinstrokewithunknownonsetbasedonnoncontrastcomputerizedtomographytrustct AT kellertlars thrombolysisinstrokewithunknownonsetbasedonnoncontrastcomputerizedtomographytrustct AT michelpatrik thrombolysisinstrokewithunknownonsetbasedonnoncontrastcomputerizedtomographytrustct AT eskandariashraf thrombolysisinstrokewithunknownonsetbasedonnoncontrastcomputerizedtomographytrustct AT feilkatharina thrombolysisinstrokewithunknownonsetbasedonnoncontrastcomputerizedtomographytrustct AT remijan thrombolysisinstrokewithunknownonsetbasedonnoncontrastcomputerizedtomographytrustct AT ferrarijulia thrombolysisinstrokewithunknownonsetbasedonnoncontrastcomputerizedtomographytrustct AT krebsstefan thrombolysisinstrokewithunknownonsetbasedonnoncontrastcomputerizedtomographytrustct AT langwilfried thrombolysisinstrokewithunknownonsetbasedonnoncontrastcomputerizedtomographytrustct AT serleswolfgang thrombolysisinstrokewithunknownonsetbasedonnoncontrastcomputerizedtomographytrustct AT siarnikpavel thrombolysisinstrokewithunknownonsetbasedonnoncontrastcomputerizedtomographytrustct AT turcanipeter thrombolysisinstrokewithunknownonsetbasedonnoncontrastcomputerizedtomographytrustct AT kovacikmichal thrombolysisinstrokewithunknownonsetbasedonnoncontrastcomputerizedtomographytrustct AT benderbenjamin thrombolysisinstrokewithunknownonsetbasedonnoncontrastcomputerizedtomographytrustct AT mengelannerose thrombolysisinstrokewithunknownonsetbasedonnoncontrastcomputerizedtomographytrustct AT polikhouloud thrombolysisinstrokewithunknownonsetbasedonnoncontrastcomputerizedtomographytrustct AT polisven thrombolysisinstrokewithunknownonsetbasedonnoncontrastcomputerizedtomographytrustct |