Cargando…

Home-Based Pediatric Palliative Care and Electronic Health: Systematic Mixed Methods Review

BACKGROUND: Children and families in pediatric palliative care depend on close contact with health care personnel, and electronic health (eHealth) is suggested to support care at home by facilitating their remote interactions. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to identify and review the use of eHealth to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Holmen, Heidi, Riiser, Kirsti, Winger, Anette
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7070344/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32130127
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/16248
_version_ 1783505953379844096
author Holmen, Heidi
Riiser, Kirsti
Winger, Anette
author_facet Holmen, Heidi
Riiser, Kirsti
Winger, Anette
author_sort Holmen, Heidi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Children and families in pediatric palliative care depend on close contact with health care personnel, and electronic health (eHealth) is suggested to support care at home by facilitating their remote interactions. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to identify and review the use of eHealth to communicate and support home-based pediatric palliative care and appraise the methodological quality of the published research. METHODS: We conducted a convergent, systematic mixed methods review and searched Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (Medline), EMBASE, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Web of Science, and Scopus for eligible papers. Studies evaluating 2-way communication technology for palliative care for children aged ≤18 years and applying quantitative, qualitative, or mixed methods from 2012 to 2018 were eligible for inclusion. Quantitative and qualitative studies were equally valued during the search, screening, extraction, and analysis. Quantitative data were transformed into qualitative data and analyzed using a thematic analysis. Overall, 2 independent researchers methodologically appraised all included studies. RESULTS: We identified 1277 citations. Only 7 papers were eligible for review. Evaluating eHealth interventions in pediatric palliative care poses specific methodological and ethical challenges. eHealth to facilitate remote pediatric palliative care was acknowledged both as an intrusion and as a support at home. Reluctance toward eHealth was mainly identified among professionals. CONCLUSIONS: The strengths of the conclusions are limited by the studies’ methodological challenges. Despite the limitless possibilities held by new technologies, research on eHealth in home-based pediatric palliative care is scarce. The affected children and families appeared to hold positive attitudes toward eHealth, although their views were less apparent compared with those of the professionals. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42018119051; https://tinyurl.com/rtsw5ky
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7070344
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70703442020-03-19 Home-Based Pediatric Palliative Care and Electronic Health: Systematic Mixed Methods Review Holmen, Heidi Riiser, Kirsti Winger, Anette J Med Internet Res Review BACKGROUND: Children and families in pediatric palliative care depend on close contact with health care personnel, and electronic health (eHealth) is suggested to support care at home by facilitating their remote interactions. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to identify and review the use of eHealth to communicate and support home-based pediatric palliative care and appraise the methodological quality of the published research. METHODS: We conducted a convergent, systematic mixed methods review and searched Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (Medline), EMBASE, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Web of Science, and Scopus for eligible papers. Studies evaluating 2-way communication technology for palliative care for children aged ≤18 years and applying quantitative, qualitative, or mixed methods from 2012 to 2018 were eligible for inclusion. Quantitative and qualitative studies were equally valued during the search, screening, extraction, and analysis. Quantitative data were transformed into qualitative data and analyzed using a thematic analysis. Overall, 2 independent researchers methodologically appraised all included studies. RESULTS: We identified 1277 citations. Only 7 papers were eligible for review. Evaluating eHealth interventions in pediatric palliative care poses specific methodological and ethical challenges. eHealth to facilitate remote pediatric palliative care was acknowledged both as an intrusion and as a support at home. Reluctance toward eHealth was mainly identified among professionals. CONCLUSIONS: The strengths of the conclusions are limited by the studies’ methodological challenges. Despite the limitless possibilities held by new technologies, research on eHealth in home-based pediatric palliative care is scarce. The affected children and families appeared to hold positive attitudes toward eHealth, although their views were less apparent compared with those of the professionals. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42018119051; https://tinyurl.com/rtsw5ky JMIR Publications 2020-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7070344/ /pubmed/32130127 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/16248 Text en ©Heidi Holmen, Kirsti Riiser, Anette Winger. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 28.02.2020. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Review
Holmen, Heidi
Riiser, Kirsti
Winger, Anette
Home-Based Pediatric Palliative Care and Electronic Health: Systematic Mixed Methods Review
title Home-Based Pediatric Palliative Care and Electronic Health: Systematic Mixed Methods Review
title_full Home-Based Pediatric Palliative Care and Electronic Health: Systematic Mixed Methods Review
title_fullStr Home-Based Pediatric Palliative Care and Electronic Health: Systematic Mixed Methods Review
title_full_unstemmed Home-Based Pediatric Palliative Care and Electronic Health: Systematic Mixed Methods Review
title_short Home-Based Pediatric Palliative Care and Electronic Health: Systematic Mixed Methods Review
title_sort home-based pediatric palliative care and electronic health: systematic mixed methods review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7070344/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32130127
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/16248
work_keys_str_mv AT holmenheidi homebasedpediatricpalliativecareandelectronichealthsystematicmixedmethodsreview
AT riiserkirsti homebasedpediatricpalliativecareandelectronichealthsystematicmixedmethodsreview
AT wingeranette homebasedpediatricpalliativecareandelectronichealthsystematicmixedmethodsreview