Cargando…

Validation of Screen-Printed Electronic Skin Based on Piezoelectric Polymer Sensors

This paper proposes a validation method of the fabrication technology of a screen-printed electronic skin based on polyvinylidene fluoride-trifluoroethylene P(VDF-TrFE) piezoelectric polymer sensors. This required researchers to insure, through non-direct sensor characterization, that printed sensor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fares, Hoda, Abbass, Yahya, Valle, Maurizio, Seminara, Lucia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7070441/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32093208
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20041160
_version_ 1783505976223072256
author Fares, Hoda
Abbass, Yahya
Valle, Maurizio
Seminara, Lucia
author_facet Fares, Hoda
Abbass, Yahya
Valle, Maurizio
Seminara, Lucia
author_sort Fares, Hoda
collection PubMed
description This paper proposes a validation method of the fabrication technology of a screen-printed electronic skin based on polyvinylidene fluoride-trifluoroethylene P(VDF-TrFE) piezoelectric polymer sensors. This required researchers to insure, through non-direct sensor characterization, that printed sensors were working as expected. For that, we adapted an existing model to non-destructively extract sensor behavior in pure compression (i.e., the d(33) piezocoefficient) by indentation tests over the skin surface. Different skin patches, designed to sensorize a glove and a prosthetic hand (11 skin patches, 104 sensors), have been tested. Reproducibility of the sensor response and its dependence upon sensor position on the fabrication substrate were examined, highlighting the drawbacks of employing large A3-sized substrates. The average value of d(33) for all sensors was measured at incremental preloads (1–3 N). A systematic decrease has been checked for patches located at positions not affected by substrate shrinkage. In turn, sensor reproducibility and d(33) adherence to literature values validated the e-skin fabrication technology. To extend the predictable behavior to all skin patches and thus increase the number of working sensors, the size of the fabrication substrate is to be decreased in future skin fabrication. The tests also demonstrated the efficiency of the proposed method to characterize embedded sensors which are no more accessible for direct validation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7070441
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70704412020-03-19 Validation of Screen-Printed Electronic Skin Based on Piezoelectric Polymer Sensors Fares, Hoda Abbass, Yahya Valle, Maurizio Seminara, Lucia Sensors (Basel) Article This paper proposes a validation method of the fabrication technology of a screen-printed electronic skin based on polyvinylidene fluoride-trifluoroethylene P(VDF-TrFE) piezoelectric polymer sensors. This required researchers to insure, through non-direct sensor characterization, that printed sensors were working as expected. For that, we adapted an existing model to non-destructively extract sensor behavior in pure compression (i.e., the d(33) piezocoefficient) by indentation tests over the skin surface. Different skin patches, designed to sensorize a glove and a prosthetic hand (11 skin patches, 104 sensors), have been tested. Reproducibility of the sensor response and its dependence upon sensor position on the fabrication substrate were examined, highlighting the drawbacks of employing large A3-sized substrates. The average value of d(33) for all sensors was measured at incremental preloads (1–3 N). A systematic decrease has been checked for patches located at positions not affected by substrate shrinkage. In turn, sensor reproducibility and d(33) adherence to literature values validated the e-skin fabrication technology. To extend the predictable behavior to all skin patches and thus increase the number of working sensors, the size of the fabrication substrate is to be decreased in future skin fabrication. The tests also demonstrated the efficiency of the proposed method to characterize embedded sensors which are no more accessible for direct validation. MDPI 2020-02-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7070441/ /pubmed/32093208 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20041160 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Fares, Hoda
Abbass, Yahya
Valle, Maurizio
Seminara, Lucia
Validation of Screen-Printed Electronic Skin Based on Piezoelectric Polymer Sensors
title Validation of Screen-Printed Electronic Skin Based on Piezoelectric Polymer Sensors
title_full Validation of Screen-Printed Electronic Skin Based on Piezoelectric Polymer Sensors
title_fullStr Validation of Screen-Printed Electronic Skin Based on Piezoelectric Polymer Sensors
title_full_unstemmed Validation of Screen-Printed Electronic Skin Based on Piezoelectric Polymer Sensors
title_short Validation of Screen-Printed Electronic Skin Based on Piezoelectric Polymer Sensors
title_sort validation of screen-printed electronic skin based on piezoelectric polymer sensors
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7070441/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32093208
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20041160
work_keys_str_mv AT fareshoda validationofscreenprintedelectronicskinbasedonpiezoelectricpolymersensors
AT abbassyahya validationofscreenprintedelectronicskinbasedonpiezoelectricpolymersensors
AT vallemaurizio validationofscreenprintedelectronicskinbasedonpiezoelectricpolymersensors
AT seminaralucia validationofscreenprintedelectronicskinbasedonpiezoelectricpolymersensors