Cargando…

Differences in Facial Expressions between Spontaneous and Posed Smiles: Automated Method by Action Units and Three-Dimensional Facial Landmarks

Research on emotion recognition from facial expressions has found evidence of different muscle movements between genuine and posed smiles. To further confirm discrete movement intensities of each facial segment, we explored differences in facial expressions between spontaneous and posed smiles with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Park, Seho, Lee, Kunyoung, Lim, Jae-A, Ko, Hyunwoong, Kim, Taehoon, Lee, Jung-In, Kim, Hakrim, Han, Seong-Jae, Kim, Jeong-Shim, Park, Soowon, Lee, Jun-Young, Lee, Eui Chul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7070510/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32098261
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20041199
_version_ 1783505991750385664
author Park, Seho
Lee, Kunyoung
Lim, Jae-A
Ko, Hyunwoong
Kim, Taehoon
Lee, Jung-In
Kim, Hakrim
Han, Seong-Jae
Kim, Jeong-Shim
Park, Soowon
Lee, Jun-Young
Lee, Eui Chul
author_facet Park, Seho
Lee, Kunyoung
Lim, Jae-A
Ko, Hyunwoong
Kim, Taehoon
Lee, Jung-In
Kim, Hakrim
Han, Seong-Jae
Kim, Jeong-Shim
Park, Soowon
Lee, Jun-Young
Lee, Eui Chul
author_sort Park, Seho
collection PubMed
description Research on emotion recognition from facial expressions has found evidence of different muscle movements between genuine and posed smiles. To further confirm discrete movement intensities of each facial segment, we explored differences in facial expressions between spontaneous and posed smiles with three-dimensional facial landmarks. Advanced machine analysis was adopted to measure changes in the dynamics of 68 segmented facial regions. A total of 57 normal adults (19 men, 38 women) who displayed adequate posed and spontaneous facial expressions for happiness were included in the analyses. The results indicate that spontaneous smiles have higher intensities for upper face than lower face. On the other hand, posed smiles showed higher intensities in the lower part of the face. Furthermore, the 3D facial landmark technique revealed that the left eyebrow displayed stronger intensity during spontaneous smiles than the right eyebrow. These findings suggest a potential application of landmark based emotion recognition that spontaneous smiles can be distinguished from posed smiles via measuring relative intensities between the upper and lower face with a focus on left-sided asymmetry in the upper region.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7070510
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70705102020-03-19 Differences in Facial Expressions between Spontaneous and Posed Smiles: Automated Method by Action Units and Three-Dimensional Facial Landmarks Park, Seho Lee, Kunyoung Lim, Jae-A Ko, Hyunwoong Kim, Taehoon Lee, Jung-In Kim, Hakrim Han, Seong-Jae Kim, Jeong-Shim Park, Soowon Lee, Jun-Young Lee, Eui Chul Sensors (Basel) Article Research on emotion recognition from facial expressions has found evidence of different muscle movements between genuine and posed smiles. To further confirm discrete movement intensities of each facial segment, we explored differences in facial expressions between spontaneous and posed smiles with three-dimensional facial landmarks. Advanced machine analysis was adopted to measure changes in the dynamics of 68 segmented facial regions. A total of 57 normal adults (19 men, 38 women) who displayed adequate posed and spontaneous facial expressions for happiness were included in the analyses. The results indicate that spontaneous smiles have higher intensities for upper face than lower face. On the other hand, posed smiles showed higher intensities in the lower part of the face. Furthermore, the 3D facial landmark technique revealed that the left eyebrow displayed stronger intensity during spontaneous smiles than the right eyebrow. These findings suggest a potential application of landmark based emotion recognition that spontaneous smiles can be distinguished from posed smiles via measuring relative intensities between the upper and lower face with a focus on left-sided asymmetry in the upper region. MDPI 2020-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7070510/ /pubmed/32098261 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20041199 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Park, Seho
Lee, Kunyoung
Lim, Jae-A
Ko, Hyunwoong
Kim, Taehoon
Lee, Jung-In
Kim, Hakrim
Han, Seong-Jae
Kim, Jeong-Shim
Park, Soowon
Lee, Jun-Young
Lee, Eui Chul
Differences in Facial Expressions between Spontaneous and Posed Smiles: Automated Method by Action Units and Three-Dimensional Facial Landmarks
title Differences in Facial Expressions between Spontaneous and Posed Smiles: Automated Method by Action Units and Three-Dimensional Facial Landmarks
title_full Differences in Facial Expressions between Spontaneous and Posed Smiles: Automated Method by Action Units and Three-Dimensional Facial Landmarks
title_fullStr Differences in Facial Expressions between Spontaneous and Posed Smiles: Automated Method by Action Units and Three-Dimensional Facial Landmarks
title_full_unstemmed Differences in Facial Expressions between Spontaneous and Posed Smiles: Automated Method by Action Units and Three-Dimensional Facial Landmarks
title_short Differences in Facial Expressions between Spontaneous and Posed Smiles: Automated Method by Action Units and Three-Dimensional Facial Landmarks
title_sort differences in facial expressions between spontaneous and posed smiles: automated method by action units and three-dimensional facial landmarks
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7070510/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32098261
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20041199
work_keys_str_mv AT parkseho differencesinfacialexpressionsbetweenspontaneousandposedsmilesautomatedmethodbyactionunitsandthreedimensionalfaciallandmarks
AT leekunyoung differencesinfacialexpressionsbetweenspontaneousandposedsmilesautomatedmethodbyactionunitsandthreedimensionalfaciallandmarks
AT limjaea differencesinfacialexpressionsbetweenspontaneousandposedsmilesautomatedmethodbyactionunitsandthreedimensionalfaciallandmarks
AT kohyunwoong differencesinfacialexpressionsbetweenspontaneousandposedsmilesautomatedmethodbyactionunitsandthreedimensionalfaciallandmarks
AT kimtaehoon differencesinfacialexpressionsbetweenspontaneousandposedsmilesautomatedmethodbyactionunitsandthreedimensionalfaciallandmarks
AT leejungin differencesinfacialexpressionsbetweenspontaneousandposedsmilesautomatedmethodbyactionunitsandthreedimensionalfaciallandmarks
AT kimhakrim differencesinfacialexpressionsbetweenspontaneousandposedsmilesautomatedmethodbyactionunitsandthreedimensionalfaciallandmarks
AT hanseongjae differencesinfacialexpressionsbetweenspontaneousandposedsmilesautomatedmethodbyactionunitsandthreedimensionalfaciallandmarks
AT kimjeongshim differencesinfacialexpressionsbetweenspontaneousandposedsmilesautomatedmethodbyactionunitsandthreedimensionalfaciallandmarks
AT parksoowon differencesinfacialexpressionsbetweenspontaneousandposedsmilesautomatedmethodbyactionunitsandthreedimensionalfaciallandmarks
AT leejunyoung differencesinfacialexpressionsbetweenspontaneousandposedsmilesautomatedmethodbyactionunitsandthreedimensionalfaciallandmarks
AT leeeuichul differencesinfacialexpressionsbetweenspontaneousandposedsmilesautomatedmethodbyactionunitsandthreedimensionalfaciallandmarks