Cargando…
Assessing the Preference of Rabbit Does to Social Contact or Seclusion: Results of Different Investigations
SIMPLE SUMMARY: Many studies were developed to improve welfare of domestic rabbits and on the possibility to increase contacts between co-specifics using animal group housing. However, a lot of behavior disorder in rabbit does was reported. This study presents two experiments carried out, respective...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7070585/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32059470 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani10020286 |
_version_ | 1783506009061326848 |
---|---|
author | Dal Bosco, Alessandro Cartoni Mancinelli, Alice Hoy, Steffen Martino, Melania Mattioli, Simona Cotozzolo, Elisa Castellini, Cesare |
author_facet | Dal Bosco, Alessandro Cartoni Mancinelli, Alice Hoy, Steffen Martino, Melania Mattioli, Simona Cotozzolo, Elisa Castellini, Cesare |
author_sort | Dal Bosco, Alessandro |
collection | PubMed |
description | SIMPLE SUMMARY: Many studies were developed to improve welfare of domestic rabbits and on the possibility to increase contacts between co-specifics using animal group housing. However, a lot of behavior disorder in rabbit does was reported. This study presents two experiments carried out, respectively, in Italy (experiment 1) and in Germany (experiment 2), to evaluate the does’ motivation towards social contact. The Italian trial was based on a choice of test cages to investigate the preferences of nulliparous rabbit does for contacts with co-specifics (in a group of four animals) or seclusion. The German trial tested a different group-housing system constituted of four does and their kits to evaluate the same behavioral aspect. Experiment 1 showed that the time spent in seclusion or in group was almost the same (49.61% vs. 50.39%, respectively) whereas, experiment 2 showed that female does with kits preferred to stay alone (71.90%) rather than in a group, probably due to a hierarchical response stimulation. Besides, it showed a different individual preference; not all does like to share space with the others. This study suggests the need to find a cage adapted to the different physiological phase of does, for example, with the possibility to modify it during the breed cycle. ABSTRACT: The aim of this study was to verify the motivation of rabbit does to social contact or seclusion. The results of two different research activities assessed in Italy (experiment 1) and Germany (experiment 2) through the use of motivational cages are reported. In experiment 1, only the average time of occupation of the group or seclusion zone was recorded of four nulliparous does, while, in experiment 2, the group-housing system provided space for does with kits and consisted of four single areas (nest boxes with individual electronic nest box recognition systems). Experiment 1 showed that does spent a similar amount of time in seclusion or in group (49.61% vs 50.39%, respectively). On the contrary, in experiment 2, does with kits appeared to prefer spending time alone (71.90%) rather than in groups. The presence of kits probably stimulates a hierarchical and aggressive response of the dominant does, with the low-ranking does staying secluded to avoid violent interactions. In fact, in each reproductive cycle, one doe did stay in the group area whereas the other three does used this area in different percentages of time. Further researches are needed to find a good combination of the cage with the does’ physiological phases. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7070585 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70705852020-03-19 Assessing the Preference of Rabbit Does to Social Contact or Seclusion: Results of Different Investigations Dal Bosco, Alessandro Cartoni Mancinelli, Alice Hoy, Steffen Martino, Melania Mattioli, Simona Cotozzolo, Elisa Castellini, Cesare Animals (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: Many studies were developed to improve welfare of domestic rabbits and on the possibility to increase contacts between co-specifics using animal group housing. However, a lot of behavior disorder in rabbit does was reported. This study presents two experiments carried out, respectively, in Italy (experiment 1) and in Germany (experiment 2), to evaluate the does’ motivation towards social contact. The Italian trial was based on a choice of test cages to investigate the preferences of nulliparous rabbit does for contacts with co-specifics (in a group of four animals) or seclusion. The German trial tested a different group-housing system constituted of four does and their kits to evaluate the same behavioral aspect. Experiment 1 showed that the time spent in seclusion or in group was almost the same (49.61% vs. 50.39%, respectively) whereas, experiment 2 showed that female does with kits preferred to stay alone (71.90%) rather than in a group, probably due to a hierarchical response stimulation. Besides, it showed a different individual preference; not all does like to share space with the others. This study suggests the need to find a cage adapted to the different physiological phase of does, for example, with the possibility to modify it during the breed cycle. ABSTRACT: The aim of this study was to verify the motivation of rabbit does to social contact or seclusion. The results of two different research activities assessed in Italy (experiment 1) and Germany (experiment 2) through the use of motivational cages are reported. In experiment 1, only the average time of occupation of the group or seclusion zone was recorded of four nulliparous does, while, in experiment 2, the group-housing system provided space for does with kits and consisted of four single areas (nest boxes with individual electronic nest box recognition systems). Experiment 1 showed that does spent a similar amount of time in seclusion or in group (49.61% vs 50.39%, respectively). On the contrary, in experiment 2, does with kits appeared to prefer spending time alone (71.90%) rather than in groups. The presence of kits probably stimulates a hierarchical and aggressive response of the dominant does, with the low-ranking does staying secluded to avoid violent interactions. In fact, in each reproductive cycle, one doe did stay in the group area whereas the other three does used this area in different percentages of time. Further researches are needed to find a good combination of the cage with the does’ physiological phases. MDPI 2020-02-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7070585/ /pubmed/32059470 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani10020286 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Dal Bosco, Alessandro Cartoni Mancinelli, Alice Hoy, Steffen Martino, Melania Mattioli, Simona Cotozzolo, Elisa Castellini, Cesare Assessing the Preference of Rabbit Does to Social Contact or Seclusion: Results of Different Investigations |
title | Assessing the Preference of Rabbit Does to Social Contact or Seclusion: Results of Different Investigations |
title_full | Assessing the Preference of Rabbit Does to Social Contact or Seclusion: Results of Different Investigations |
title_fullStr | Assessing the Preference of Rabbit Does to Social Contact or Seclusion: Results of Different Investigations |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessing the Preference of Rabbit Does to Social Contact or Seclusion: Results of Different Investigations |
title_short | Assessing the Preference of Rabbit Does to Social Contact or Seclusion: Results of Different Investigations |
title_sort | assessing the preference of rabbit does to social contact or seclusion: results of different investigations |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7070585/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32059470 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani10020286 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dalboscoalessandro assessingthepreferenceofrabbitdoestosocialcontactorseclusionresultsofdifferentinvestigations AT cartonimancinellialice assessingthepreferenceofrabbitdoestosocialcontactorseclusionresultsofdifferentinvestigations AT hoysteffen assessingthepreferenceofrabbitdoestosocialcontactorseclusionresultsofdifferentinvestigations AT martinomelania assessingthepreferenceofrabbitdoestosocialcontactorseclusionresultsofdifferentinvestigations AT mattiolisimona assessingthepreferenceofrabbitdoestosocialcontactorseclusionresultsofdifferentinvestigations AT cotozzoloelisa assessingthepreferenceofrabbitdoestosocialcontactorseclusionresultsofdifferentinvestigations AT castellinicesare assessingthepreferenceofrabbitdoestosocialcontactorseclusionresultsofdifferentinvestigations |