Cargando…

Comparative Assessment of Phytochemical Profiles of Comfrey (Symphytum officinale L.) Root Extracts Obtained by Different Extraction Techniques

In this work a comparative study on phytochemical profiles of comfrey root extracts obtained by different extraction approaches has been carried out. Chemical profiles of extracts obtained by supercritical fluid (SFE), pressurized liquid (PLE), and conventional solid/liquid extraction were compared...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nastić, Nataša, Borrás-Linares, Isabel, Lozano-Sánchez, Jesús, Švarc-Gajić, Jaroslava, Segura-Carretero, Antonio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7070662/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32075048
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules25040837
_version_ 1783506026792747008
author Nastić, Nataša
Borrás-Linares, Isabel
Lozano-Sánchez, Jesús
Švarc-Gajić, Jaroslava
Segura-Carretero, Antonio
author_facet Nastić, Nataša
Borrás-Linares, Isabel
Lozano-Sánchez, Jesús
Švarc-Gajić, Jaroslava
Segura-Carretero, Antonio
author_sort Nastić, Nataša
collection PubMed
description In this work a comparative study on phytochemical profiles of comfrey root extracts obtained by different extraction approaches has been carried out. Chemical profiles of extracts obtained by supercritical fluid (SFE), pressurized liquid (PLE), and conventional solid/liquid extraction were compared and discussed. Phytochemical composition was assessed by high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with electrospray time-of-flight mass spectrometry (HPLC-ESI-QTOF-MS/MS) identifying 39 compounds reported for the first time in comfrey root, mainly phenolic acids and fatty acids. The influence of different extraction parameters on phytochemical profiles of S. officinale root was investigated for all applied techniques. PLE and maceration, using alcohol-based solvents (aqueous methanol or ethanol), were shown to be more efficient in the recovery of more polar compounds. Greater numbers of phenolics were best extracted by PLE using 85% EtOH at 63 °C. The use of SFE and 100% acetone for 30 min enabled good recoveries of nonpolar compounds. SFE using 15% EtOH as a cosolvent at 150 bar produced the best recoveries of a significant number of fatty acids. The main compositional differences between extracts obtained by different extraction techniques were assigned to the solvent type. Hence, these results provided comprehensive approaches for treating comfrey root enriched in different phytochemicals, thereby enhancing its bioaccessibility.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7070662
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70706622020-03-19 Comparative Assessment of Phytochemical Profiles of Comfrey (Symphytum officinale L.) Root Extracts Obtained by Different Extraction Techniques Nastić, Nataša Borrás-Linares, Isabel Lozano-Sánchez, Jesús Švarc-Gajić, Jaroslava Segura-Carretero, Antonio Molecules Article In this work a comparative study on phytochemical profiles of comfrey root extracts obtained by different extraction approaches has been carried out. Chemical profiles of extracts obtained by supercritical fluid (SFE), pressurized liquid (PLE), and conventional solid/liquid extraction were compared and discussed. Phytochemical composition was assessed by high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with electrospray time-of-flight mass spectrometry (HPLC-ESI-QTOF-MS/MS) identifying 39 compounds reported for the first time in comfrey root, mainly phenolic acids and fatty acids. The influence of different extraction parameters on phytochemical profiles of S. officinale root was investigated for all applied techniques. PLE and maceration, using alcohol-based solvents (aqueous methanol or ethanol), were shown to be more efficient in the recovery of more polar compounds. Greater numbers of phenolics were best extracted by PLE using 85% EtOH at 63 °C. The use of SFE and 100% acetone for 30 min enabled good recoveries of nonpolar compounds. SFE using 15% EtOH as a cosolvent at 150 bar produced the best recoveries of a significant number of fatty acids. The main compositional differences between extracts obtained by different extraction techniques were assigned to the solvent type. Hence, these results provided comprehensive approaches for treating comfrey root enriched in different phytochemicals, thereby enhancing its bioaccessibility. MDPI 2020-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7070662/ /pubmed/32075048 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules25040837 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Nastić, Nataša
Borrás-Linares, Isabel
Lozano-Sánchez, Jesús
Švarc-Gajić, Jaroslava
Segura-Carretero, Antonio
Comparative Assessment of Phytochemical Profiles of Comfrey (Symphytum officinale L.) Root Extracts Obtained by Different Extraction Techniques
title Comparative Assessment of Phytochemical Profiles of Comfrey (Symphytum officinale L.) Root Extracts Obtained by Different Extraction Techniques
title_full Comparative Assessment of Phytochemical Profiles of Comfrey (Symphytum officinale L.) Root Extracts Obtained by Different Extraction Techniques
title_fullStr Comparative Assessment of Phytochemical Profiles of Comfrey (Symphytum officinale L.) Root Extracts Obtained by Different Extraction Techniques
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Assessment of Phytochemical Profiles of Comfrey (Symphytum officinale L.) Root Extracts Obtained by Different Extraction Techniques
title_short Comparative Assessment of Phytochemical Profiles of Comfrey (Symphytum officinale L.) Root Extracts Obtained by Different Extraction Techniques
title_sort comparative assessment of phytochemical profiles of comfrey (symphytum officinale l.) root extracts obtained by different extraction techniques
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7070662/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32075048
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules25040837
work_keys_str_mv AT nasticnatasa comparativeassessmentofphytochemicalprofilesofcomfreysymphytumofficinalelrootextractsobtainedbydifferentextractiontechniques
AT borraslinaresisabel comparativeassessmentofphytochemicalprofilesofcomfreysymphytumofficinalelrootextractsobtainedbydifferentextractiontechniques
AT lozanosanchezjesus comparativeassessmentofphytochemicalprofilesofcomfreysymphytumofficinalelrootextractsobtainedbydifferentextractiontechniques
AT svarcgajicjaroslava comparativeassessmentofphytochemicalprofilesofcomfreysymphytumofficinalelrootextractsobtainedbydifferentextractiontechniques
AT seguracarreteroantonio comparativeassessmentofphytochemicalprofilesofcomfreysymphytumofficinalelrootextractsobtainedbydifferentextractiontechniques