Cargando…

A Network Meta‐Analysis of Efficacy of Different Interventions in the Prevention of Postoperative Intrauterine Adhesions

This network meta‐analysis was conducted to compare the efficacy of six interventions, including anti‐blocking agents, intrauterine contraceptive devices (IUDs), estrogens, intrauterine balloon, Foley catheter, and amnion graft for the prevention of intrauterine adhesions (IUAs). We searched PubMed,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xiong, Qian, Zhang, Tiansong, Su, Shujun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7070815/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31692267
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cts.12721
_version_ 1783506061771145216
author Xiong, Qian
Zhang, Tiansong
Su, Shujun
author_facet Xiong, Qian
Zhang, Tiansong
Su, Shujun
author_sort Xiong, Qian
collection PubMed
description This network meta‐analysis was conducted to compare the efficacy of six interventions, including anti‐blocking agents, intrauterine contraceptive devices (IUDs), estrogens, intrauterine balloon, Foley catheter, and amnion graft for the prevention of intrauterine adhesions (IUAs). We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library from inception to December 2016. Cohort studies meeting these six interventions in the prevention of IUAs were included. The combination of direct and indirect evidence was conducted to assess the odds ratio (OR) or weighted mean differences and surface under the cumulative ranking curves of the six interventions in the prevention of postoperative IUAs. Finally, 12 eligible cohort studies were included in this network meta‐analysis. The results of this network meta‐analysis demonstrated that during 1 to 2 months after operation, compared with the surgical group, anti‐blocking agent, and estrogens presented with relatively low ratios of postoperative IUAs (OR = 0.30 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.10–0.67; OR = 0.12, 95% CI = 0.01–0.78, respectively). Compared with IUDs, estrogens exerted comparatively low ratio of postoperative IUAs (OR = 0.10, 95% CI = 0.01–0.90), which indicated that anti‐blocking agent and estrogens had relatively better prevention efficacy. The cluster analysis showed that estrogens had relatively better efficacy in the prevention postoperative IUAs. Overall, our findings support that estrogens had relatively better efficacy in the prevention of postoperative IUAs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7070815
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70708152020-03-17 A Network Meta‐Analysis of Efficacy of Different Interventions in the Prevention of Postoperative Intrauterine Adhesions Xiong, Qian Zhang, Tiansong Su, Shujun Clin Transl Sci Research This network meta‐analysis was conducted to compare the efficacy of six interventions, including anti‐blocking agents, intrauterine contraceptive devices (IUDs), estrogens, intrauterine balloon, Foley catheter, and amnion graft for the prevention of intrauterine adhesions (IUAs). We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library from inception to December 2016. Cohort studies meeting these six interventions in the prevention of IUAs were included. The combination of direct and indirect evidence was conducted to assess the odds ratio (OR) or weighted mean differences and surface under the cumulative ranking curves of the six interventions in the prevention of postoperative IUAs. Finally, 12 eligible cohort studies were included in this network meta‐analysis. The results of this network meta‐analysis demonstrated that during 1 to 2 months after operation, compared with the surgical group, anti‐blocking agent, and estrogens presented with relatively low ratios of postoperative IUAs (OR = 0.30 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.10–0.67; OR = 0.12, 95% CI = 0.01–0.78, respectively). Compared with IUDs, estrogens exerted comparatively low ratio of postoperative IUAs (OR = 0.10, 95% CI = 0.01–0.90), which indicated that anti‐blocking agent and estrogens had relatively better prevention efficacy. The cluster analysis showed that estrogens had relatively better efficacy in the prevention postoperative IUAs. Overall, our findings support that estrogens had relatively better efficacy in the prevention of postoperative IUAs. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-01-25 2020-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7070815/ /pubmed/31692267 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cts.12721 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Clinical and Translational Science published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of the American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Research
Xiong, Qian
Zhang, Tiansong
Su, Shujun
A Network Meta‐Analysis of Efficacy of Different Interventions in the Prevention of Postoperative Intrauterine Adhesions
title A Network Meta‐Analysis of Efficacy of Different Interventions in the Prevention of Postoperative Intrauterine Adhesions
title_full A Network Meta‐Analysis of Efficacy of Different Interventions in the Prevention of Postoperative Intrauterine Adhesions
title_fullStr A Network Meta‐Analysis of Efficacy of Different Interventions in the Prevention of Postoperative Intrauterine Adhesions
title_full_unstemmed A Network Meta‐Analysis of Efficacy of Different Interventions in the Prevention of Postoperative Intrauterine Adhesions
title_short A Network Meta‐Analysis of Efficacy of Different Interventions in the Prevention of Postoperative Intrauterine Adhesions
title_sort network meta‐analysis of efficacy of different interventions in the prevention of postoperative intrauterine adhesions
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7070815/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31692267
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cts.12721
work_keys_str_mv AT xiongqian anetworkmetaanalysisofefficacyofdifferentinterventionsinthepreventionofpostoperativeintrauterineadhesions
AT zhangtiansong anetworkmetaanalysisofefficacyofdifferentinterventionsinthepreventionofpostoperativeintrauterineadhesions
AT sushujun anetworkmetaanalysisofefficacyofdifferentinterventionsinthepreventionofpostoperativeintrauterineadhesions
AT xiongqian networkmetaanalysisofefficacyofdifferentinterventionsinthepreventionofpostoperativeintrauterineadhesions
AT zhangtiansong networkmetaanalysisofefficacyofdifferentinterventionsinthepreventionofpostoperativeintrauterineadhesions
AT sushujun networkmetaanalysisofefficacyofdifferentinterventionsinthepreventionofpostoperativeintrauterineadhesions