Cargando…
Comparison between different surface treatment methods on shear bond strength of zirconia (in vitro study)
BACKGROUND: To compare the effect of Er:YAG Laser and Air particle abrasion (APA) surface treatments on shear bond strength of Y-TZP to composite resin cuboids in the presence and absence of primer application and salivary contamination. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Seventy-two cuboidal shaped specimens 7x...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medicina Oral S.L.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7071543/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32190197 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.56242 |
_version_ | 1783506225982341120 |
---|---|
author | Joukhadar, Christelle Osman, Essam Rayyan, Mohammad Shrebaty, Mohammed |
author_facet | Joukhadar, Christelle Osman, Essam Rayyan, Mohammad Shrebaty, Mohammed |
author_sort | Joukhadar, Christelle |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To compare the effect of Er:YAG Laser and Air particle abrasion (APA) surface treatments on shear bond strength of Y-TZP to composite resin cuboids in the presence and absence of primer application and salivary contamination. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Seventy-two cuboidal shaped specimens 7x7x3 were prepared from Y-TZP using CADCAM, cleaned and sintered. Specimens were divided into 2 main groups (n=36) according to surface treatment method; Air particle abrasion (A) and laser (L). Each group was subdivided into 2 subgroups (N = 18) according to surface modification using primer; each subgroup was further divided into 2 subdivisions (N=9) according to the presence of salivary contamination; APC (Air particle abrasion, primer, contamination), AP (Air particle abrasion, primer), AC (Air particle abrasion, contamination), A (Air particle abrasion), LPC (Laser, primer, contamination), LP (Laser, primer), LC (Laser, contamination), L (Laser). Composite cuboids having dimensions of 6x6x3 were also fabricated using custom made plexi plates. Composite cuboids were cemented centrally to zirconia cuboids and light cured under 5 kg weight for 6 mins. Shear bond strength of specimens was measured utilizing universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. Failure loads were recorded in Newton. SBS was calculated according to equation: SBS (MPa) = load (N)/area(mm2). RESULTS: Viewing shear bond strength between studied groups, group APNC (484.02±85.02) showed higher mean value compared to ANPNC (122.09±55.80), also LNPNC (120.87±65.10) showed higher mean value in comparison to LPNC (170.78±53.22). APNC (484.02±85.02) and APC (592.22±189.65) showed higher mean values than LPNC (170.78±53.22) and LPC (3227.66±108.28) in sequence. CONCLUSIONS: APA showed higher SBS values than Er:YAG surface treatment. Primer showed better results than no primer coating. Artificial saliva contamination did not affect the SBS of zirconia compared with no contamination results. Key words:Shear bond strength, zirconia, air particle abrasion, Er:YAG laser, primer, contamination. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7071543 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Medicina Oral S.L. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70715432020-03-18 Comparison between different surface treatment methods on shear bond strength of zirconia (in vitro study) Joukhadar, Christelle Osman, Essam Rayyan, Mohammad Shrebaty, Mohammed J Clin Exp Dent Research BACKGROUND: To compare the effect of Er:YAG Laser and Air particle abrasion (APA) surface treatments on shear bond strength of Y-TZP to composite resin cuboids in the presence and absence of primer application and salivary contamination. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Seventy-two cuboidal shaped specimens 7x7x3 were prepared from Y-TZP using CADCAM, cleaned and sintered. Specimens were divided into 2 main groups (n=36) according to surface treatment method; Air particle abrasion (A) and laser (L). Each group was subdivided into 2 subgroups (N = 18) according to surface modification using primer; each subgroup was further divided into 2 subdivisions (N=9) according to the presence of salivary contamination; APC (Air particle abrasion, primer, contamination), AP (Air particle abrasion, primer), AC (Air particle abrasion, contamination), A (Air particle abrasion), LPC (Laser, primer, contamination), LP (Laser, primer), LC (Laser, contamination), L (Laser). Composite cuboids having dimensions of 6x6x3 were also fabricated using custom made plexi plates. Composite cuboids were cemented centrally to zirconia cuboids and light cured under 5 kg weight for 6 mins. Shear bond strength of specimens was measured utilizing universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. Failure loads were recorded in Newton. SBS was calculated according to equation: SBS (MPa) = load (N)/area(mm2). RESULTS: Viewing shear bond strength between studied groups, group APNC (484.02±85.02) showed higher mean value compared to ANPNC (122.09±55.80), also LNPNC (120.87±65.10) showed higher mean value in comparison to LPNC (170.78±53.22). APNC (484.02±85.02) and APC (592.22±189.65) showed higher mean values than LPNC (170.78±53.22) and LPC (3227.66±108.28) in sequence. CONCLUSIONS: APA showed higher SBS values than Er:YAG surface treatment. Primer showed better results than no primer coating. Artificial saliva contamination did not affect the SBS of zirconia compared with no contamination results. Key words:Shear bond strength, zirconia, air particle abrasion, Er:YAG laser, primer, contamination. Medicina Oral S.L. 2020-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7071543/ /pubmed/32190197 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.56242 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Medicina Oral S.L. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Joukhadar, Christelle Osman, Essam Rayyan, Mohammad Shrebaty, Mohammed Comparison between different surface treatment methods on shear bond strength of zirconia (in vitro study) |
title | Comparison between different surface treatment methods on shear bond strength of zirconia (in vitro study) |
title_full | Comparison between different surface treatment methods on shear bond strength of zirconia (in vitro study) |
title_fullStr | Comparison between different surface treatment methods on shear bond strength of zirconia (in vitro study) |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison between different surface treatment methods on shear bond strength of zirconia (in vitro study) |
title_short | Comparison between different surface treatment methods on shear bond strength of zirconia (in vitro study) |
title_sort | comparison between different surface treatment methods on shear bond strength of zirconia (in vitro study) |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7071543/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32190197 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.56242 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT joukhadarchristelle comparisonbetweendifferentsurfacetreatmentmethodsonshearbondstrengthofzirconiainvitrostudy AT osmanessam comparisonbetweendifferentsurfacetreatmentmethodsonshearbondstrengthofzirconiainvitrostudy AT rayyanmohammad comparisonbetweendifferentsurfacetreatmentmethodsonshearbondstrengthofzirconiainvitrostudy AT shrebatymohammed comparisonbetweendifferentsurfacetreatmentmethodsonshearbondstrengthofzirconiainvitrostudy |