Cargando…

Hooked epinephrine auto-injector devices in children: four case reports with three different proposed mechanisms

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of epinephrine auto-injectors (EAI) use is on the rise. Our objective was to describes children with hooked EAI needles that were embedded in soft tissues. CASE PRESENTATION: Results: Two children self-injected in their shins. The embedded EAIs required removal in the Emer...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Goldman, Ran D., Long, Katharine C., Brown, Julie C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7071737/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32190077
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13223-020-00418-0
_version_ 1783506270031970304
author Goldman, Ran D.
Long, Katharine C.
Brown, Julie C.
author_facet Goldman, Ran D.
Long, Katharine C.
Brown, Julie C.
author_sort Goldman, Ran D.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The prevalence of epinephrine auto-injectors (EAI) use is on the rise. Our objective was to describes children with hooked EAI needles that were embedded in soft tissues. CASE PRESENTATION: Results: Two children self-injected in their shins. The embedded EAIs required removal in the Emergency Department. Both needles were hooked and splayed at the tip. A boy in anaphylaxis kicked his leg during EAI injection and the hooked needle embedded under his skin and was difficult to dislodge. The exposed needle was curved. A girl had an EAI administered for anaphylaxis, which was also difficult to dislodge. On removal, the distal needle tip was hooked approximately 160 degrees. Images of the device revealed that the needle fired off-center from the device and the device components were cracked. We propose three different explanations for these hooked EAI needles. The first is that the needle could hit bone during injection and curve rather than penetrates further. Secondly, the needle could bend when the patient moves during injection. Thirdly, if a needle fires sufficiently off-center to hit the cartridge carrier, this could hook the needle prior to injection. CONCLUSIONS: Awareness of the reasons for needle hooking, damage observed, and challenges and successful approaches to their removal, can better prepare the provider for these uncommon events. Teaching parents, children and educators about safe EAI storage and appropriate restraint during use may prevent some of these accidental injuries. Reporting device failures may lead to improvements in device performance and design.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7071737
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70717372020-03-18 Hooked epinephrine auto-injector devices in children: four case reports with three different proposed mechanisms Goldman, Ran D. Long, Katharine C. Brown, Julie C. Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol Case Report BACKGROUND: The prevalence of epinephrine auto-injectors (EAI) use is on the rise. Our objective was to describes children with hooked EAI needles that were embedded in soft tissues. CASE PRESENTATION: Results: Two children self-injected in their shins. The embedded EAIs required removal in the Emergency Department. Both needles were hooked and splayed at the tip. A boy in anaphylaxis kicked his leg during EAI injection and the hooked needle embedded under his skin and was difficult to dislodge. The exposed needle was curved. A girl had an EAI administered for anaphylaxis, which was also difficult to dislodge. On removal, the distal needle tip was hooked approximately 160 degrees. Images of the device revealed that the needle fired off-center from the device and the device components were cracked. We propose three different explanations for these hooked EAI needles. The first is that the needle could hit bone during injection and curve rather than penetrates further. Secondly, the needle could bend when the patient moves during injection. Thirdly, if a needle fires sufficiently off-center to hit the cartridge carrier, this could hook the needle prior to injection. CONCLUSIONS: Awareness of the reasons for needle hooking, damage observed, and challenges and successful approaches to their removal, can better prepare the provider for these uncommon events. Teaching parents, children and educators about safe EAI storage and appropriate restraint during use may prevent some of these accidental injuries. Reporting device failures may lead to improvements in device performance and design. BioMed Central 2020-03-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7071737/ /pubmed/32190077 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13223-020-00418-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Case Report
Goldman, Ran D.
Long, Katharine C.
Brown, Julie C.
Hooked epinephrine auto-injector devices in children: four case reports with three different proposed mechanisms
title Hooked epinephrine auto-injector devices in children: four case reports with three different proposed mechanisms
title_full Hooked epinephrine auto-injector devices in children: four case reports with three different proposed mechanisms
title_fullStr Hooked epinephrine auto-injector devices in children: four case reports with three different proposed mechanisms
title_full_unstemmed Hooked epinephrine auto-injector devices in children: four case reports with three different proposed mechanisms
title_short Hooked epinephrine auto-injector devices in children: four case reports with three different proposed mechanisms
title_sort hooked epinephrine auto-injector devices in children: four case reports with three different proposed mechanisms
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7071737/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32190077
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13223-020-00418-0
work_keys_str_mv AT goldmanrand hookedepinephrineautoinjectordevicesinchildrenfourcasereportswiththreedifferentproposedmechanisms
AT longkatharinec hookedepinephrineautoinjectordevicesinchildrenfourcasereportswiththreedifferentproposedmechanisms
AT brownjuliec hookedepinephrineautoinjectordevicesinchildrenfourcasereportswiththreedifferentproposedmechanisms