Cargando…

Psychological distress and nutritional status in head and neck cancer patients: a pilot study

PURPOSE: To determine whether the psychological state of patients with head and neck cancer (HCN) is associated with their nutritional status. METHODS: In 40 patients with locally advanced HNC treated with definitive or adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy, psychological and nutritional status were assessed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gosak, Maja, Gradišar, Kaja, Rotovnik Kozjek, Nada, Strojan, Primož
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7072056/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32025788
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-020-05798-y
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: To determine whether the psychological state of patients with head and neck cancer (HCN) is associated with their nutritional status. METHODS: In 40 patients with locally advanced HNC treated with definitive or adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy, psychological and nutritional status were assessed before treatment, at its completion and 3 months’ post-therapy. Psychosocial distress was measured using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale questionnaire (HADS-A, HADS-D), whereas the nutritional status was evaluated using standard methods (Nutritional Risk Screening Tool 2002, anthropometric data, dynamometry and laboratory tests) and with a bioelectrical impedance analysis parameter phase angle (PA). RESULTS: Before treatment, more patients were screened positive for anxiety than at treatment completion (p = 0.037) or 3 months’ post-therapy (p = 0.083). Depression prevalence was non-significantly higher at the end and after therapy. Compared to the baseline, more cachectic patients and a reduction of PA values were found at successive assessments. Anxiety was more often recorded among malnourished/cachectic patients (assessment 1, p = 0.017; assessment 2, p = 0.020) who were also found more frequently depressed (assessment 2, p = 0.045; assessment 3, p = 0.023). Significantly higher PA values were measured in patients without distress determined at 3 months’ post-therapy by the HADS-A (p = 0.027). CONCLUSION: The association between the psychological and nutritional status found in this pilot study and the options for intervention warrants further clarification in a larger prospective trial.