Cargando…

Assessment of computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery system for pain control during restorative procedures: A randomized controlled trial

Background. . Local anesthesia is given to decrease pain perception during dental treatments, but it may itself be a reason for pain and aggravate the dental fear. Computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery system (CCLADS) is one of the alternatives for decreasing the patients’ pain during local...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Saoji, Hrishikesh, Nainan, Mohan Thomas, Nanjappa, Naveen, Khairnar, Mahesh Ravindra, Hishikar, Meeta, Jadhav, Vivek
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Tabriz University of Medical Sciences 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7072086/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32190214
http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/joddd.2019.045
_version_ 1783506323580649472
author Saoji, Hrishikesh
Nainan, Mohan Thomas
Nanjappa, Naveen
Khairnar, Mahesh Ravindra
Hishikar, Meeta
Jadhav, Vivek
author_facet Saoji, Hrishikesh
Nainan, Mohan Thomas
Nanjappa, Naveen
Khairnar, Mahesh Ravindra
Hishikar, Meeta
Jadhav, Vivek
author_sort Saoji, Hrishikesh
collection PubMed
description Background. . Local anesthesia is given to decrease pain perception during dental treatments, but it may itself be a reason for pain and aggravate the dental fear. Computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery system (CCLADS) is one of the alternatives for decreasing the patients’ pain during local anesthesia. This study compared the time required for the recovery from anesthesia, pain/discomfort during injection and pain/discomfort 24 hours after administering local anesthesia with CCLADS, a standard self-aspirating syringe and a conventional disposable 2-mL syringe. Methods. The study was conducted on 90 subjects (an age group of 20-40 years), who suffered from sensitivity during cavity preparation. They were randomly divided into three groups of 30 individuals each to receive intraligamentary anesthesia (2% lignocaine with 1:80,000 adrenaline) using either of the three techniques: CCLADS, a standard self-aspirating syringe, or a conventional disposable 2-mL syringe. The onset of anesthesia, time required for recovery from anesthesia (in minutes), pain/discomfort during injection and pain/discomfort 24 hours after administering local anesthesia were recorded. Results. The time required for the onset of anesthesia and recovery from anesthesia was shorter with CCLADS (4.83±2.31 and 34.2±1.895, respectively) as compared to the standard self-aspirating group (10.83±1.90 and 43.5±7.581, respectively) and the conventional group (11.00±2.03 and 43.5±6.453, respectively) (P<0.001). The patients in the CCLADS group experienced no pain during local anesthesia administration as compared to the patients in the self-aspirating and conventional groups. The CCLADS and self-aspirating groups showed lower pain response as compared to the conventional group for pain after 24 hours. Conclusion. CCLADS can be an effective and pain-free alternative to conventional local anesthetic procedures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7072086
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Tabriz University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70720862020-03-18 Assessment of computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery system for pain control during restorative procedures: A randomized controlled trial Saoji, Hrishikesh Nainan, Mohan Thomas Nanjappa, Naveen Khairnar, Mahesh Ravindra Hishikar, Meeta Jadhav, Vivek J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects Original Research Background. . Local anesthesia is given to decrease pain perception during dental treatments, but it may itself be a reason for pain and aggravate the dental fear. Computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery system (CCLADS) is one of the alternatives for decreasing the patients’ pain during local anesthesia. This study compared the time required for the recovery from anesthesia, pain/discomfort during injection and pain/discomfort 24 hours after administering local anesthesia with CCLADS, a standard self-aspirating syringe and a conventional disposable 2-mL syringe. Methods. The study was conducted on 90 subjects (an age group of 20-40 years), who suffered from sensitivity during cavity preparation. They were randomly divided into three groups of 30 individuals each to receive intraligamentary anesthesia (2% lignocaine with 1:80,000 adrenaline) using either of the three techniques: CCLADS, a standard self-aspirating syringe, or a conventional disposable 2-mL syringe. The onset of anesthesia, time required for recovery from anesthesia (in minutes), pain/discomfort during injection and pain/discomfort 24 hours after administering local anesthesia were recorded. Results. The time required for the onset of anesthesia and recovery from anesthesia was shorter with CCLADS (4.83±2.31 and 34.2±1.895, respectively) as compared to the standard self-aspirating group (10.83±1.90 and 43.5±7.581, respectively) and the conventional group (11.00±2.03 and 43.5±6.453, respectively) (P<0.001). The patients in the CCLADS group experienced no pain during local anesthesia administration as compared to the patients in the self-aspirating and conventional groups. The CCLADS and self-aspirating groups showed lower pain response as compared to the conventional group for pain after 24 hours. Conclusion. CCLADS can be an effective and pain-free alternative to conventional local anesthetic procedures. Tabriz University of Medical Sciences 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC7072086/ /pubmed/32190214 http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/joddd.2019.045 Text en © 2019 Saoji et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article published and distributed by Tabriz University of Medical Sciences under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Saoji, Hrishikesh
Nainan, Mohan Thomas
Nanjappa, Naveen
Khairnar, Mahesh Ravindra
Hishikar, Meeta
Jadhav, Vivek
Assessment of computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery system for pain control during restorative procedures: A randomized controlled trial
title Assessment of computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery system for pain control during restorative procedures: A randomized controlled trial
title_full Assessment of computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery system for pain control during restorative procedures: A randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Assessment of computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery system for pain control during restorative procedures: A randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery system for pain control during restorative procedures: A randomized controlled trial
title_short Assessment of computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery system for pain control during restorative procedures: A randomized controlled trial
title_sort assessment of computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery system for pain control during restorative procedures: a randomized controlled trial
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7072086/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32190214
http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/joddd.2019.045
work_keys_str_mv AT saojihrishikesh assessmentofcomputercontrolledlocalanestheticdeliverysystemforpaincontrolduringrestorativeproceduresarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT nainanmohanthomas assessmentofcomputercontrolledlocalanestheticdeliverysystemforpaincontrolduringrestorativeproceduresarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT nanjappanaveen assessmentofcomputercontrolledlocalanestheticdeliverysystemforpaincontrolduringrestorativeproceduresarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT khairnarmaheshravindra assessmentofcomputercontrolledlocalanestheticdeliverysystemforpaincontrolduringrestorativeproceduresarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT hishikarmeeta assessmentofcomputercontrolledlocalanestheticdeliverysystemforpaincontrolduringrestorativeproceduresarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT jadhavvivek assessmentofcomputercontrolledlocalanestheticdeliverysystemforpaincontrolduringrestorativeproceduresarandomizedcontrolledtrial