Cargando…

Comparison of Supported Ionic Liquid Membranes and Polymeric Ultrafiltration and Nanofiltration Membranes for Separation of Lignin and Monosaccharides

Lignin is one of the three main components of lignocellulosic biomass and must be considered a raw material with attractive applications from an economic and ecological point of view. Therefore, biorefineries must have in mind the most adequate processing to obtain high-quality lignin and the separa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abejón, Ricardo, Rabadán, Javier, Garea, Aurora, Irabien, Angel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7073623/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32075000
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes10020029
_version_ 1783506660850925568
author Abejón, Ricardo
Rabadán, Javier
Garea, Aurora
Irabien, Angel
author_facet Abejón, Ricardo
Rabadán, Javier
Garea, Aurora
Irabien, Angel
author_sort Abejón, Ricardo
collection PubMed
description Lignin is one of the three main components of lignocellulosic biomass and must be considered a raw material with attractive applications from an economic and ecological point of view. Therefore, biorefineries must have in mind the most adequate processing to obtain high-quality lignin and the separation tasks that play a key role to improve the purity of the lignin. Separation techniques based on membranes are a promising way to achieve these requirements. In this work, the separation performance of the SILM (Supported Ionic Liquid Membrane) formed with [BMIM][DBP] as IL (Ionic Liquid) and PTFE as membrane support was compared to a nanofiltration (NF) membrane (NP010 by Microdyn-Nadir) and two ultrafiltration (UF) membranes (UF5 and UF10 by Trisep). The SILM showed selective transport of Kraft lignin, lignosulphonate, xylose, and glucose in aqueous solutions. Although it was stable under different conditions and its performance was improved by the integration of agitation, it was not competitive when compared to NF and UF membranes, although the latter ones suffered fouling. The NF membrane was the best alternative for the separation of lignosulphonates from monosaccharides (separation factors around 75 while SILM attained only values lower than 3), while the UF5 membrane should be selected to separate Kraft lignin and monosaccharides (separation factors around 100 while SILM attained only values below 3).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7073623
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70736232020-03-19 Comparison of Supported Ionic Liquid Membranes and Polymeric Ultrafiltration and Nanofiltration Membranes for Separation of Lignin and Monosaccharides Abejón, Ricardo Rabadán, Javier Garea, Aurora Irabien, Angel Membranes (Basel) Article Lignin is one of the three main components of lignocellulosic biomass and must be considered a raw material with attractive applications from an economic and ecological point of view. Therefore, biorefineries must have in mind the most adequate processing to obtain high-quality lignin and the separation tasks that play a key role to improve the purity of the lignin. Separation techniques based on membranes are a promising way to achieve these requirements. In this work, the separation performance of the SILM (Supported Ionic Liquid Membrane) formed with [BMIM][DBP] as IL (Ionic Liquid) and PTFE as membrane support was compared to a nanofiltration (NF) membrane (NP010 by Microdyn-Nadir) and two ultrafiltration (UF) membranes (UF5 and UF10 by Trisep). The SILM showed selective transport of Kraft lignin, lignosulphonate, xylose, and glucose in aqueous solutions. Although it was stable under different conditions and its performance was improved by the integration of agitation, it was not competitive when compared to NF and UF membranes, although the latter ones suffered fouling. The NF membrane was the best alternative for the separation of lignosulphonates from monosaccharides (separation factors around 75 while SILM attained only values lower than 3), while the UF5 membrane should be selected to separate Kraft lignin and monosaccharides (separation factors around 100 while SILM attained only values below 3). MDPI 2020-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7073623/ /pubmed/32075000 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes10020029 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Abejón, Ricardo
Rabadán, Javier
Garea, Aurora
Irabien, Angel
Comparison of Supported Ionic Liquid Membranes and Polymeric Ultrafiltration and Nanofiltration Membranes for Separation of Lignin and Monosaccharides
title Comparison of Supported Ionic Liquid Membranes and Polymeric Ultrafiltration and Nanofiltration Membranes for Separation of Lignin and Monosaccharides
title_full Comparison of Supported Ionic Liquid Membranes and Polymeric Ultrafiltration and Nanofiltration Membranes for Separation of Lignin and Monosaccharides
title_fullStr Comparison of Supported Ionic Liquid Membranes and Polymeric Ultrafiltration and Nanofiltration Membranes for Separation of Lignin and Monosaccharides
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Supported Ionic Liquid Membranes and Polymeric Ultrafiltration and Nanofiltration Membranes for Separation of Lignin and Monosaccharides
title_short Comparison of Supported Ionic Liquid Membranes and Polymeric Ultrafiltration and Nanofiltration Membranes for Separation of Lignin and Monosaccharides
title_sort comparison of supported ionic liquid membranes and polymeric ultrafiltration and nanofiltration membranes for separation of lignin and monosaccharides
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7073623/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32075000
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes10020029
work_keys_str_mv AT abejonricardo comparisonofsupportedionicliquidmembranesandpolymericultrafiltrationandnanofiltrationmembranesforseparationofligninandmonosaccharides
AT rabadanjavier comparisonofsupportedionicliquidmembranesandpolymericultrafiltrationandnanofiltrationmembranesforseparationofligninandmonosaccharides
AT gareaaurora comparisonofsupportedionicliquidmembranesandpolymericultrafiltrationandnanofiltrationmembranesforseparationofligninandmonosaccharides
AT irabienangel comparisonofsupportedionicliquidmembranesandpolymericultrafiltrationandnanofiltrationmembranesforseparationofligninandmonosaccharides