Cargando…

Long-term Outcomes of Carotid Artery Stenting: A Single-center Experience

The long-term prophylactic effect of carotid artery stenting (CAS) remains incompletely elucidated. We evaluated outcomes of CAS at our institution to determine the safety and efficacy of CAS in real-world settings. We retrospectively analyzed 73 patients who underwent CAS from 2006 to 2013. Peripro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: FUSE, Yutaro, KOJIMA, Takao, SHINTAI, Kazunori, SEKI, Yukio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Japan Neurosurgical Society 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7073700/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31902874
http://dx.doi.org/10.2176/nmc.oa.2019-0192
_version_ 1783506678799400960
author FUSE, Yutaro
KOJIMA, Takao
SHINTAI, Kazunori
SEKI, Yukio
author_facet FUSE, Yutaro
KOJIMA, Takao
SHINTAI, Kazunori
SEKI, Yukio
author_sort FUSE, Yutaro
collection PubMed
description The long-term prophylactic effect of carotid artery stenting (CAS) remains incompletely elucidated. We evaluated outcomes of CAS at our institution to determine the safety and efficacy of CAS in real-world settings. We retrospectively analyzed 73 patients who underwent CAS from 2006 to 2013. Periprocedural results were compared between asymptomatic and symptomatic carotid stenosis groups. The primary endpoint was a composite of ipsilateral stroke, death, and carotid artery restenosis beyond 30 days and within 5 years after the first procedure. The average age was 72.2 years with a majority of male subjects (84.9%). Twenty-seven patients (37%) were asymptomatic. Incidence of periprocedural adverse events and mRS ≤2 at 30 days after CAS were not significantly different between groups (P = 0.14 and 0.07, respectively). CAS was unsuccessful in three patients and one post-procedural minor stroke occurred. Therefore, 69 patients were included in the long-term study. The rate of occurrence of the primary endpoint was 21.7%. Ipsilateral ischemic stroke occurred in one patient, which was due to cardiogenic embolus. Nine patients died, and cancer was the most frequent cause. Five in-stent restenoses were observed. All patients with restenosis underwent additional CAS without any occurrence of stroke. This study revealed the safety and long-term efficacy of CAS in a real-world setting. Routine follow-up is also important for detecting carotid artery restenosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7073700
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher The Japan Neurosurgical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70737002020-03-18 Long-term Outcomes of Carotid Artery Stenting: A Single-center Experience FUSE, Yutaro KOJIMA, Takao SHINTAI, Kazunori SEKI, Yukio Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) Original Article The long-term prophylactic effect of carotid artery stenting (CAS) remains incompletely elucidated. We evaluated outcomes of CAS at our institution to determine the safety and efficacy of CAS in real-world settings. We retrospectively analyzed 73 patients who underwent CAS from 2006 to 2013. Periprocedural results were compared between asymptomatic and symptomatic carotid stenosis groups. The primary endpoint was a composite of ipsilateral stroke, death, and carotid artery restenosis beyond 30 days and within 5 years after the first procedure. The average age was 72.2 years with a majority of male subjects (84.9%). Twenty-seven patients (37%) were asymptomatic. Incidence of periprocedural adverse events and mRS ≤2 at 30 days after CAS were not significantly different between groups (P = 0.14 and 0.07, respectively). CAS was unsuccessful in three patients and one post-procedural minor stroke occurred. Therefore, 69 patients were included in the long-term study. The rate of occurrence of the primary endpoint was 21.7%. Ipsilateral ischemic stroke occurred in one patient, which was due to cardiogenic embolus. Nine patients died, and cancer was the most frequent cause. Five in-stent restenoses were observed. All patients with restenosis underwent additional CAS without any occurrence of stroke. This study revealed the safety and long-term efficacy of CAS in a real-world setting. Routine follow-up is also important for detecting carotid artery restenosis. The Japan Neurosurgical Society 2020-03 2020-01-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7073700/ /pubmed/31902874 http://dx.doi.org/10.2176/nmc.oa.2019-0192 Text en © 2020 The Japan Neurosurgical Society The Japan Neurosurgical Society The Japan Neurosurgical Society This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
spellingShingle Original Article
FUSE, Yutaro
KOJIMA, Takao
SHINTAI, Kazunori
SEKI, Yukio
Long-term Outcomes of Carotid Artery Stenting: A Single-center Experience
title Long-term Outcomes of Carotid Artery Stenting: A Single-center Experience
title_full Long-term Outcomes of Carotid Artery Stenting: A Single-center Experience
title_fullStr Long-term Outcomes of Carotid Artery Stenting: A Single-center Experience
title_full_unstemmed Long-term Outcomes of Carotid Artery Stenting: A Single-center Experience
title_short Long-term Outcomes of Carotid Artery Stenting: A Single-center Experience
title_sort long-term outcomes of carotid artery stenting: a single-center experience
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7073700/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31902874
http://dx.doi.org/10.2176/nmc.oa.2019-0192
work_keys_str_mv AT fuseyutaro longtermoutcomesofcarotidarterystentingasinglecenterexperience
AT kojimatakao longtermoutcomesofcarotidarterystentingasinglecenterexperience
AT shintaikazunori longtermoutcomesofcarotidarterystentingasinglecenterexperience
AT sekiyukio longtermoutcomesofcarotidarterystentingasinglecenterexperience