Cargando…
Long-term Outcomes of Carotid Artery Stenting: A Single-center Experience
The long-term prophylactic effect of carotid artery stenting (CAS) remains incompletely elucidated. We evaluated outcomes of CAS at our institution to determine the safety and efficacy of CAS in real-world settings. We retrospectively analyzed 73 patients who underwent CAS from 2006 to 2013. Peripro...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Japan Neurosurgical Society
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7073700/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31902874 http://dx.doi.org/10.2176/nmc.oa.2019-0192 |
_version_ | 1783506678799400960 |
---|---|
author | FUSE, Yutaro KOJIMA, Takao SHINTAI, Kazunori SEKI, Yukio |
author_facet | FUSE, Yutaro KOJIMA, Takao SHINTAI, Kazunori SEKI, Yukio |
author_sort | FUSE, Yutaro |
collection | PubMed |
description | The long-term prophylactic effect of carotid artery stenting (CAS) remains incompletely elucidated. We evaluated outcomes of CAS at our institution to determine the safety and efficacy of CAS in real-world settings. We retrospectively analyzed 73 patients who underwent CAS from 2006 to 2013. Periprocedural results were compared between asymptomatic and symptomatic carotid stenosis groups. The primary endpoint was a composite of ipsilateral stroke, death, and carotid artery restenosis beyond 30 days and within 5 years after the first procedure. The average age was 72.2 years with a majority of male subjects (84.9%). Twenty-seven patients (37%) were asymptomatic. Incidence of periprocedural adverse events and mRS ≤2 at 30 days after CAS were not significantly different between groups (P = 0.14 and 0.07, respectively). CAS was unsuccessful in three patients and one post-procedural minor stroke occurred. Therefore, 69 patients were included in the long-term study. The rate of occurrence of the primary endpoint was 21.7%. Ipsilateral ischemic stroke occurred in one patient, which was due to cardiogenic embolus. Nine patients died, and cancer was the most frequent cause. Five in-stent restenoses were observed. All patients with restenosis underwent additional CAS without any occurrence of stroke. This study revealed the safety and long-term efficacy of CAS in a real-world setting. Routine follow-up is also important for detecting carotid artery restenosis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7073700 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | The Japan Neurosurgical Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70737002020-03-18 Long-term Outcomes of Carotid Artery Stenting: A Single-center Experience FUSE, Yutaro KOJIMA, Takao SHINTAI, Kazunori SEKI, Yukio Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) Original Article The long-term prophylactic effect of carotid artery stenting (CAS) remains incompletely elucidated. We evaluated outcomes of CAS at our institution to determine the safety and efficacy of CAS in real-world settings. We retrospectively analyzed 73 patients who underwent CAS from 2006 to 2013. Periprocedural results were compared between asymptomatic and symptomatic carotid stenosis groups. The primary endpoint was a composite of ipsilateral stroke, death, and carotid artery restenosis beyond 30 days and within 5 years after the first procedure. The average age was 72.2 years with a majority of male subjects (84.9%). Twenty-seven patients (37%) were asymptomatic. Incidence of periprocedural adverse events and mRS ≤2 at 30 days after CAS were not significantly different between groups (P = 0.14 and 0.07, respectively). CAS was unsuccessful in three patients and one post-procedural minor stroke occurred. Therefore, 69 patients were included in the long-term study. The rate of occurrence of the primary endpoint was 21.7%. Ipsilateral ischemic stroke occurred in one patient, which was due to cardiogenic embolus. Nine patients died, and cancer was the most frequent cause. Five in-stent restenoses were observed. All patients with restenosis underwent additional CAS without any occurrence of stroke. This study revealed the safety and long-term efficacy of CAS in a real-world setting. Routine follow-up is also important for detecting carotid artery restenosis. The Japan Neurosurgical Society 2020-03 2020-01-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7073700/ /pubmed/31902874 http://dx.doi.org/10.2176/nmc.oa.2019-0192 Text en © 2020 The Japan Neurosurgical Society The Japan Neurosurgical Society The Japan Neurosurgical Society This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Original Article FUSE, Yutaro KOJIMA, Takao SHINTAI, Kazunori SEKI, Yukio Long-term Outcomes of Carotid Artery Stenting: A Single-center Experience |
title | Long-term Outcomes of Carotid Artery Stenting: A Single-center Experience |
title_full | Long-term Outcomes of Carotid Artery Stenting: A Single-center Experience |
title_fullStr | Long-term Outcomes of Carotid Artery Stenting: A Single-center Experience |
title_full_unstemmed | Long-term Outcomes of Carotid Artery Stenting: A Single-center Experience |
title_short | Long-term Outcomes of Carotid Artery Stenting: A Single-center Experience |
title_sort | long-term outcomes of carotid artery stenting: a single-center experience |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7073700/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31902874 http://dx.doi.org/10.2176/nmc.oa.2019-0192 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fuseyutaro longtermoutcomesofcarotidarterystentingasinglecenterexperience AT kojimatakao longtermoutcomesofcarotidarterystentingasinglecenterexperience AT shintaikazunori longtermoutcomesofcarotidarterystentingasinglecenterexperience AT sekiyukio longtermoutcomesofcarotidarterystentingasinglecenterexperience |