Cargando…

Safety and Efficacy of a New Synthetic Material Based on Monetite, Silica Gel, PS-Wallastonite, and a Hydroxyapatite Calcium Deficient: A Randomized Comparative Clinic Trial

Background and Objectives: Maxillary bone defects related to post-extraction alveolar ridge resorption are usual. These defects may lead to failure in further surgical implant phases given the lack of bone volume to perform the dental implant. The objective of this clinical assay was to evaluate the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Flores Fraile, Javier, López-Valverde, Nansi, García de Castro Andews, Arcadio, Santos Marino, Juan Antonio, Ramírez, Juan M., Gómez de Diego, Rafael, Montero, Javier, López-Valverde, Antonio, Blanco Antona, Leticia Alejandra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7073755/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31972958
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina56020046
_version_ 1783506691574202368
author Flores Fraile, Javier
López-Valverde, Nansi
García de Castro Andews, Arcadio
Santos Marino, Juan Antonio
Ramírez, Juan M.
Gómez de Diego, Rafael
Montero, Javier
López-Valverde, Antonio
Blanco Antona, Leticia Alejandra
author_facet Flores Fraile, Javier
López-Valverde, Nansi
García de Castro Andews, Arcadio
Santos Marino, Juan Antonio
Ramírez, Juan M.
Gómez de Diego, Rafael
Montero, Javier
López-Valverde, Antonio
Blanco Antona, Leticia Alejandra
author_sort Flores Fraile, Javier
collection PubMed
description Background and Objectives: Maxillary bone defects related to post-extraction alveolar ridge resorption are usual. These defects may lead to failure in further surgical implant phases given the lack of bone volume to perform the dental implant. The objective of this clinical assay was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of an experimental synthetic bone substitute in the preservation of post-extraction maxillary alveoli. Materials and Methods: 33 voluntary patients who had at least one maxillary premolar tooth that was a candidate for exodontia (n = 39) and subsequent implant rehabilitation participated. The regenerated alveoli were monitored by means of periodic clinical examinations (days 9 ± 1, 21 ± 4, 42 ± 6, and 84 ± 6), measuring the height and width of the alveolar crest (days 0 and 180 ± 5), measurement of radiodensity using tomographic techniques (days 0–5 and 175 ± 5), and histological examination of biopsies collected at 180 ± 5 days. Results: No significant differences were observed during the entire follow-up period between the two groups with respect to the safety variables studied. A variation in width of −0.9 ± 1.3 mm and −0.6 ± 1.5 mm, and a variation in height of −0.1 ± 0.9 mm and −0.3 ± 0.7 mm was observed for experimental material Sil-Oss(®) and Bio-Oss(®), respectively. The radiodensity of the alveoli regenerated with the experimental material was significantly lower than that corresponding to Bio-Oss(®). However, the histological study showed greater osteoid matrix and replacement of the material with newformed bone in the implanted beds with the experimental material. Conclusions: Both materials can be used safely and proved equally effective in maintaining alveolar flange dimensions, they are also histologically biocompatible, bioactive and osteoconductive. The experimental material showed the advantage of being resorbable and replaced with newformed bone, in addition to promoting bone regeneration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7073755
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70737552020-03-19 Safety and Efficacy of a New Synthetic Material Based on Monetite, Silica Gel, PS-Wallastonite, and a Hydroxyapatite Calcium Deficient: A Randomized Comparative Clinic Trial Flores Fraile, Javier López-Valverde, Nansi García de Castro Andews, Arcadio Santos Marino, Juan Antonio Ramírez, Juan M. Gómez de Diego, Rafael Montero, Javier López-Valverde, Antonio Blanco Antona, Leticia Alejandra Medicina (Kaunas) Article Background and Objectives: Maxillary bone defects related to post-extraction alveolar ridge resorption are usual. These defects may lead to failure in further surgical implant phases given the lack of bone volume to perform the dental implant. The objective of this clinical assay was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of an experimental synthetic bone substitute in the preservation of post-extraction maxillary alveoli. Materials and Methods: 33 voluntary patients who had at least one maxillary premolar tooth that was a candidate for exodontia (n = 39) and subsequent implant rehabilitation participated. The regenerated alveoli were monitored by means of periodic clinical examinations (days 9 ± 1, 21 ± 4, 42 ± 6, and 84 ± 6), measuring the height and width of the alveolar crest (days 0 and 180 ± 5), measurement of radiodensity using tomographic techniques (days 0–5 and 175 ± 5), and histological examination of biopsies collected at 180 ± 5 days. Results: No significant differences were observed during the entire follow-up period between the two groups with respect to the safety variables studied. A variation in width of −0.9 ± 1.3 mm and −0.6 ± 1.5 mm, and a variation in height of −0.1 ± 0.9 mm and −0.3 ± 0.7 mm was observed for experimental material Sil-Oss(®) and Bio-Oss(®), respectively. The radiodensity of the alveoli regenerated with the experimental material was significantly lower than that corresponding to Bio-Oss(®). However, the histological study showed greater osteoid matrix and replacement of the material with newformed bone in the implanted beds with the experimental material. Conclusions: Both materials can be used safely and proved equally effective in maintaining alveolar flange dimensions, they are also histologically biocompatible, bioactive and osteoconductive. The experimental material showed the advantage of being resorbable and replaced with newformed bone, in addition to promoting bone regeneration. MDPI 2020-01-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7073755/ /pubmed/31972958 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina56020046 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Flores Fraile, Javier
López-Valverde, Nansi
García de Castro Andews, Arcadio
Santos Marino, Juan Antonio
Ramírez, Juan M.
Gómez de Diego, Rafael
Montero, Javier
López-Valverde, Antonio
Blanco Antona, Leticia Alejandra
Safety and Efficacy of a New Synthetic Material Based on Monetite, Silica Gel, PS-Wallastonite, and a Hydroxyapatite Calcium Deficient: A Randomized Comparative Clinic Trial
title Safety and Efficacy of a New Synthetic Material Based on Monetite, Silica Gel, PS-Wallastonite, and a Hydroxyapatite Calcium Deficient: A Randomized Comparative Clinic Trial
title_full Safety and Efficacy of a New Synthetic Material Based on Monetite, Silica Gel, PS-Wallastonite, and a Hydroxyapatite Calcium Deficient: A Randomized Comparative Clinic Trial
title_fullStr Safety and Efficacy of a New Synthetic Material Based on Monetite, Silica Gel, PS-Wallastonite, and a Hydroxyapatite Calcium Deficient: A Randomized Comparative Clinic Trial
title_full_unstemmed Safety and Efficacy of a New Synthetic Material Based on Monetite, Silica Gel, PS-Wallastonite, and a Hydroxyapatite Calcium Deficient: A Randomized Comparative Clinic Trial
title_short Safety and Efficacy of a New Synthetic Material Based on Monetite, Silica Gel, PS-Wallastonite, and a Hydroxyapatite Calcium Deficient: A Randomized Comparative Clinic Trial
title_sort safety and efficacy of a new synthetic material based on monetite, silica gel, ps-wallastonite, and a hydroxyapatite calcium deficient: a randomized comparative clinic trial
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7073755/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31972958
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina56020046
work_keys_str_mv AT floresfrailejavier safetyandefficacyofanewsyntheticmaterialbasedonmonetitesilicagelpswallastoniteandahydroxyapatitecalciumdeficientarandomizedcomparativeclinictrial
AT lopezvalverdenansi safetyandefficacyofanewsyntheticmaterialbasedonmonetitesilicagelpswallastoniteandahydroxyapatitecalciumdeficientarandomizedcomparativeclinictrial
AT garciadecastroandewsarcadio safetyandefficacyofanewsyntheticmaterialbasedonmonetitesilicagelpswallastoniteandahydroxyapatitecalciumdeficientarandomizedcomparativeclinictrial
AT santosmarinojuanantonio safetyandefficacyofanewsyntheticmaterialbasedonmonetitesilicagelpswallastoniteandahydroxyapatitecalciumdeficientarandomizedcomparativeclinictrial
AT ramirezjuanm safetyandefficacyofanewsyntheticmaterialbasedonmonetitesilicagelpswallastoniteandahydroxyapatitecalciumdeficientarandomizedcomparativeclinictrial
AT gomezdediegorafael safetyandefficacyofanewsyntheticmaterialbasedonmonetitesilicagelpswallastoniteandahydroxyapatitecalciumdeficientarandomizedcomparativeclinictrial
AT monterojavier safetyandefficacyofanewsyntheticmaterialbasedonmonetitesilicagelpswallastoniteandahydroxyapatitecalciumdeficientarandomizedcomparativeclinictrial
AT lopezvalverdeantonio safetyandefficacyofanewsyntheticmaterialbasedonmonetitesilicagelpswallastoniteandahydroxyapatitecalciumdeficientarandomizedcomparativeclinictrial
AT blancoantonaleticiaalejandra safetyandefficacyofanewsyntheticmaterialbasedonmonetitesilicagelpswallastoniteandahydroxyapatitecalciumdeficientarandomizedcomparativeclinictrial