Cargando…

Review of the Sensory and Physico-Chemical Properties of Red and White Wheat: Which Makes the Best Whole Grain?

Establishing sensory and physico-chemical differences between products made from red and white wheat may guide the choice of wheat for use in whole grain and high fibre products. As sensory acceptance is key to consumption, this scoping review aimed to document sensory and physico-chemical research...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Grafenauer, Sara, Miglioretto, Chiara, Solah, Vicky, Curtain, Felicity
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7073758/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32012822
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods9020136
_version_ 1783506692270456832
author Grafenauer, Sara
Miglioretto, Chiara
Solah, Vicky
Curtain, Felicity
author_facet Grafenauer, Sara
Miglioretto, Chiara
Solah, Vicky
Curtain, Felicity
author_sort Grafenauer, Sara
collection PubMed
description Establishing sensory and physico-chemical differences between products made from red and white wheat may guide the choice of wheat for use in whole grain and high fibre products. As sensory acceptance is key to consumption, this scoping review aimed to document sensory and physico-chemical research demonstrating quantitative differences in red and white wheat and the associated bran. The following databases were systematically searched following the PRISMA protocol: PubMed, Medline, Scopus, CINHAL and ScienceDirect (1990–2019). Of 16 studies, 13 were sensory studies with 529 participants (six of which included quantitative analysis) and three additional quantitative studies. Overall, 10 studies were in favour of white wheat (seven sensory studies, two focused on quantitative analysis and two with additional quantitative studies). Whole grain (wholemeal) bread, pita bread, crackers, noodles, tortillas, flour, intact grains and bran were examined. Aside from the seed coat colour, levels of bound versus free phenolic compounds and polyphenol oxidase activity appeared most responsible for the differences in red and white wheat. Ensuring the sample size for sensory studies are large enough to detect between-group preferences and linking to physico-chemical analysis are recommended. Attention to blinding techniques in sensory testing and use of food products realistically and consistently prepared with commercial potential are also suggested. This scoping review provides confidence in preference for white wheat for whole grain products, particularly for breads, tortillas and in the choice of white wheat for products suitable for the Asian market.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7073758
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70737582020-03-19 Review of the Sensory and Physico-Chemical Properties of Red and White Wheat: Which Makes the Best Whole Grain? Grafenauer, Sara Miglioretto, Chiara Solah, Vicky Curtain, Felicity Foods Review Establishing sensory and physico-chemical differences between products made from red and white wheat may guide the choice of wheat for use in whole grain and high fibre products. As sensory acceptance is key to consumption, this scoping review aimed to document sensory and physico-chemical research demonstrating quantitative differences in red and white wheat and the associated bran. The following databases were systematically searched following the PRISMA protocol: PubMed, Medline, Scopus, CINHAL and ScienceDirect (1990–2019). Of 16 studies, 13 were sensory studies with 529 participants (six of which included quantitative analysis) and three additional quantitative studies. Overall, 10 studies were in favour of white wheat (seven sensory studies, two focused on quantitative analysis and two with additional quantitative studies). Whole grain (wholemeal) bread, pita bread, crackers, noodles, tortillas, flour, intact grains and bran were examined. Aside from the seed coat colour, levels of bound versus free phenolic compounds and polyphenol oxidase activity appeared most responsible for the differences in red and white wheat. Ensuring the sample size for sensory studies are large enough to detect between-group preferences and linking to physico-chemical analysis are recommended. Attention to blinding techniques in sensory testing and use of food products realistically and consistently prepared with commercial potential are also suggested. This scoping review provides confidence in preference for white wheat for whole grain products, particularly for breads, tortillas and in the choice of white wheat for products suitable for the Asian market. MDPI 2020-01-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7073758/ /pubmed/32012822 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods9020136 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Grafenauer, Sara
Miglioretto, Chiara
Solah, Vicky
Curtain, Felicity
Review of the Sensory and Physico-Chemical Properties of Red and White Wheat: Which Makes the Best Whole Grain?
title Review of the Sensory and Physico-Chemical Properties of Red and White Wheat: Which Makes the Best Whole Grain?
title_full Review of the Sensory and Physico-Chemical Properties of Red and White Wheat: Which Makes the Best Whole Grain?
title_fullStr Review of the Sensory and Physico-Chemical Properties of Red and White Wheat: Which Makes the Best Whole Grain?
title_full_unstemmed Review of the Sensory and Physico-Chemical Properties of Red and White Wheat: Which Makes the Best Whole Grain?
title_short Review of the Sensory and Physico-Chemical Properties of Red and White Wheat: Which Makes the Best Whole Grain?
title_sort review of the sensory and physico-chemical properties of red and white wheat: which makes the best whole grain?
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7073758/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32012822
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods9020136
work_keys_str_mv AT grafenauersara reviewofthesensoryandphysicochemicalpropertiesofredandwhitewheatwhichmakesthebestwholegrain
AT migliorettochiara reviewofthesensoryandphysicochemicalpropertiesofredandwhitewheatwhichmakesthebestwholegrain
AT solahvicky reviewofthesensoryandphysicochemicalpropertiesofredandwhitewheatwhichmakesthebestwholegrain
AT curtainfelicity reviewofthesensoryandphysicochemicalpropertiesofredandwhitewheatwhichmakesthebestwholegrain