Cargando…

Interventions to improve quantitative measures of parent satisfaction in neonatal care: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE: Interventions improving parent satisfaction can reduce parent stress, may improve parent-infant bonding and infant outcomes. Our objective was to systematically review neonatal interventions relating to parents of infants of all gestations where an outcome was parent satisfaction. METHODS...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sakonidou, Susanna, Andrzejewska, Izabela, Webbe, James, Modi, Neena, Bell, Derek, Gale, Chris
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7073789/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32201743
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2019-000613
_version_ 1783506698989731840
author Sakonidou, Susanna
Andrzejewska, Izabela
Webbe, James
Modi, Neena
Bell, Derek
Gale, Chris
author_facet Sakonidou, Susanna
Andrzejewska, Izabela
Webbe, James
Modi, Neena
Bell, Derek
Gale, Chris
author_sort Sakonidou, Susanna
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Interventions improving parent satisfaction can reduce parent stress, may improve parent-infant bonding and infant outcomes. Our objective was to systematically review neonatal interventions relating to parents of infants of all gestations where an outcome was parent satisfaction. METHODS: We searched the databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsychINFO, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CINAHL, HMIC, Maternity and Infant Care between 1 January 1946 and 1 October 2017. Inclusion criteria were randomised controlled trials (RCT), cohort studies and other non-randomised studies if participants were parents of infants receiving neonatal care, interventions were implemented in neonatal units (of any care level) and ≥1 quantitative outcome of parent satisfaction was measured. Included studies were limited to the English language only. We extracted study characteristics, interventions, outcomes and parent involvement in intervention design. Included studies were not sufficiently homogenous to enable quantitative synthesis. We assessed quality with the Cochrane Collaboration risk of bias tool (randomised) and the ROBINS-I tool (Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions) (non-randomised studies). RESULTS: We identified 32 studies with satisfaction measures from over 2800 parents and grouped interventions into 5 themes. Most studies were non-randomised involving preterm infants. Parent satisfaction was measured by 334 different questions in 29 questionnaires (only 6/29 fully validated). 18/32 studies reported higher parent satisfaction in the intervention group. The intervention theme with most studies reporting higher satisfaction was parent involvement (10/14). Five (5/32) studies reported involving parents in intervention design. All studies had high risk of bias. CONCLUSIONS: Many interventions, commonly relating to parent involvement, are reported to improve parent satisfaction. Inconsistency in satisfaction measurements and high risk of bias makes this low-quality evidence. Standardised, validated parent satisfaction measures are needed, as well as higher quality trials of parent experience involving parents in intervention design. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42017072388.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7073789
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70737892020-03-20 Interventions to improve quantitative measures of parent satisfaction in neonatal care: a systematic review Sakonidou, Susanna Andrzejewska, Izabela Webbe, James Modi, Neena Bell, Derek Gale, Chris BMJ Paediatr Open Neonatology OBJECTIVE: Interventions improving parent satisfaction can reduce parent stress, may improve parent-infant bonding and infant outcomes. Our objective was to systematically review neonatal interventions relating to parents of infants of all gestations where an outcome was parent satisfaction. METHODS: We searched the databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsychINFO, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CINAHL, HMIC, Maternity and Infant Care between 1 January 1946 and 1 October 2017. Inclusion criteria were randomised controlled trials (RCT), cohort studies and other non-randomised studies if participants were parents of infants receiving neonatal care, interventions were implemented in neonatal units (of any care level) and ≥1 quantitative outcome of parent satisfaction was measured. Included studies were limited to the English language only. We extracted study characteristics, interventions, outcomes and parent involvement in intervention design. Included studies were not sufficiently homogenous to enable quantitative synthesis. We assessed quality with the Cochrane Collaboration risk of bias tool (randomised) and the ROBINS-I tool (Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions) (non-randomised studies). RESULTS: We identified 32 studies with satisfaction measures from over 2800 parents and grouped interventions into 5 themes. Most studies were non-randomised involving preterm infants. Parent satisfaction was measured by 334 different questions in 29 questionnaires (only 6/29 fully validated). 18/32 studies reported higher parent satisfaction in the intervention group. The intervention theme with most studies reporting higher satisfaction was parent involvement (10/14). Five (5/32) studies reported involving parents in intervention design. All studies had high risk of bias. CONCLUSIONS: Many interventions, commonly relating to parent involvement, are reported to improve parent satisfaction. Inconsistency in satisfaction measurements and high risk of bias makes this low-quality evidence. Standardised, validated parent satisfaction measures are needed, as well as higher quality trials of parent experience involving parents in intervention design. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42017072388. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7073789/ /pubmed/32201743 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2019-000613 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Neonatology
Sakonidou, Susanna
Andrzejewska, Izabela
Webbe, James
Modi, Neena
Bell, Derek
Gale, Chris
Interventions to improve quantitative measures of parent satisfaction in neonatal care: a systematic review
title Interventions to improve quantitative measures of parent satisfaction in neonatal care: a systematic review
title_full Interventions to improve quantitative measures of parent satisfaction in neonatal care: a systematic review
title_fullStr Interventions to improve quantitative measures of parent satisfaction in neonatal care: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Interventions to improve quantitative measures of parent satisfaction in neonatal care: a systematic review
title_short Interventions to improve quantitative measures of parent satisfaction in neonatal care: a systematic review
title_sort interventions to improve quantitative measures of parent satisfaction in neonatal care: a systematic review
topic Neonatology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7073789/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32201743
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2019-000613
work_keys_str_mv AT sakonidoususanna interventionstoimprovequantitativemeasuresofparentsatisfactioninneonatalcareasystematicreview
AT andrzejewskaizabela interventionstoimprovequantitativemeasuresofparentsatisfactioninneonatalcareasystematicreview
AT webbejames interventionstoimprovequantitativemeasuresofparentsatisfactioninneonatalcareasystematicreview
AT modineena interventionstoimprovequantitativemeasuresofparentsatisfactioninneonatalcareasystematicreview
AT bellderek interventionstoimprovequantitativemeasuresofparentsatisfactioninneonatalcareasystematicreview
AT galechris interventionstoimprovequantitativemeasuresofparentsatisfactioninneonatalcareasystematicreview