Cargando…
Effect of CETP inhibition with evacetrapib in patients with diabetes mellitus enrolled in the ACCELERATE trial
BACKGROUND: High-density lipoprotein (HDL) levels are inversely associated with cardiovascular risk. Cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibition with evacetrapib results in a marked increase in HDL and reduction in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) levels. We evaluated the impact of treatment with eva...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7073792/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32179516 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2019-000943 |
_version_ | 1783506699711152128 |
---|---|
author | Menon, Venu Kumar, Anirudh Patel, Divyang R St John, Julie Riesmeyer, Jeffrey Weerakkody, Govinda Ruotolo, Giacomo Wolski, Kathy E McErlean, Ellen Cremer, Paul C Nicholls, Stephen J Lincoff, A Michael Nissen, Steven E |
author_facet | Menon, Venu Kumar, Anirudh Patel, Divyang R St John, Julie Riesmeyer, Jeffrey Weerakkody, Govinda Ruotolo, Giacomo Wolski, Kathy E McErlean, Ellen Cremer, Paul C Nicholls, Stephen J Lincoff, A Michael Nissen, Steven E |
author_sort | Menon, Venu |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: High-density lipoprotein (HDL) levels are inversely associated with cardiovascular risk. Cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibition with evacetrapib results in a marked increase in HDL and reduction in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) levels. We evaluated the impact of treatment with evacetrapib versus placebo in the subset of 8236 patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) enrolled in the Assessment of Clinical Effects of Cholesteryl Ester Transfer Protein Inhibition with Evacetrapib in Patients at a High Risk for Vascular Outcomes trial. METHODS AND RESULTS: Time to first occurrence of any component of the primary composite endpoint of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, revascularization, and hospitalization for unstable angina was compared among patients with DM randomized to treatment with evacetrapib (n=4127) or placebo (n=4109) over a median of 26 months of follow-up. The mean baseline LDL at initiation was 80 mg/dL with a mean baseline HDL of 44 mg/dL. In patients with DM, evacetrapib resulted in a 131% mean increase in HDL levels and a 32% mean decrease in LDL at 3 months that was sustained during the course of the trial. At 6 months, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels were lower with evacetrapib than placebo (7.08% vs 7.15%, p=0.023). Composite event rates were higher in patients with DM than without DM (Kaplan-Meier estimates: 15.2% vs 10.6%, HR 1.46, 95% CI 1.30 to 1.64, p<0.001). In the DM group, event rates for the composite endpoint (14.5% evacetrapib vs 16% placebo, HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.07, p=0.38) and individual components of the composite were similar for both evacetrapib and placebo groups. No significant treatment interaction between treatment assignment and diabetes status was noted. CONCLUSION: Despite a favorable increase in HDL, and decreases in LDL and HbA1c levels in patients with DM, we observed no benefits of treatment with evacetrapib on prespecified clinical outcomes in this high-risk population. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7073792 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70737922020-03-20 Effect of CETP inhibition with evacetrapib in patients with diabetes mellitus enrolled in the ACCELERATE trial Menon, Venu Kumar, Anirudh Patel, Divyang R St John, Julie Riesmeyer, Jeffrey Weerakkody, Govinda Ruotolo, Giacomo Wolski, Kathy E McErlean, Ellen Cremer, Paul C Nicholls, Stephen J Lincoff, A Michael Nissen, Steven E BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care Cardiovascular and Metabolic Risk BACKGROUND: High-density lipoprotein (HDL) levels are inversely associated with cardiovascular risk. Cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibition with evacetrapib results in a marked increase in HDL and reduction in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) levels. We evaluated the impact of treatment with evacetrapib versus placebo in the subset of 8236 patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) enrolled in the Assessment of Clinical Effects of Cholesteryl Ester Transfer Protein Inhibition with Evacetrapib in Patients at a High Risk for Vascular Outcomes trial. METHODS AND RESULTS: Time to first occurrence of any component of the primary composite endpoint of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, revascularization, and hospitalization for unstable angina was compared among patients with DM randomized to treatment with evacetrapib (n=4127) or placebo (n=4109) over a median of 26 months of follow-up. The mean baseline LDL at initiation was 80 mg/dL with a mean baseline HDL of 44 mg/dL. In patients with DM, evacetrapib resulted in a 131% mean increase in HDL levels and a 32% mean decrease in LDL at 3 months that was sustained during the course of the trial. At 6 months, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels were lower with evacetrapib than placebo (7.08% vs 7.15%, p=0.023). Composite event rates were higher in patients with DM than without DM (Kaplan-Meier estimates: 15.2% vs 10.6%, HR 1.46, 95% CI 1.30 to 1.64, p<0.001). In the DM group, event rates for the composite endpoint (14.5% evacetrapib vs 16% placebo, HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.07, p=0.38) and individual components of the composite were similar for both evacetrapib and placebo groups. No significant treatment interaction between treatment assignment and diabetes status was noted. CONCLUSION: Despite a favorable increase in HDL, and decreases in LDL and HbA1c levels in patients with DM, we observed no benefits of treatment with evacetrapib on prespecified clinical outcomes in this high-risk population. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7073792/ /pubmed/32179516 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2019-000943 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Cardiovascular and Metabolic Risk Menon, Venu Kumar, Anirudh Patel, Divyang R St John, Julie Riesmeyer, Jeffrey Weerakkody, Govinda Ruotolo, Giacomo Wolski, Kathy E McErlean, Ellen Cremer, Paul C Nicholls, Stephen J Lincoff, A Michael Nissen, Steven E Effect of CETP inhibition with evacetrapib in patients with diabetes mellitus enrolled in the ACCELERATE trial |
title | Effect of CETP inhibition with evacetrapib in patients with diabetes mellitus enrolled in the ACCELERATE trial |
title_full | Effect of CETP inhibition with evacetrapib in patients with diabetes mellitus enrolled in the ACCELERATE trial |
title_fullStr | Effect of CETP inhibition with evacetrapib in patients with diabetes mellitus enrolled in the ACCELERATE trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Effect of CETP inhibition with evacetrapib in patients with diabetes mellitus enrolled in the ACCELERATE trial |
title_short | Effect of CETP inhibition with evacetrapib in patients with diabetes mellitus enrolled in the ACCELERATE trial |
title_sort | effect of cetp inhibition with evacetrapib in patients with diabetes mellitus enrolled in the accelerate trial |
topic | Cardiovascular and Metabolic Risk |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7073792/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32179516 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2019-000943 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT menonvenu effectofcetpinhibitionwithevacetrapibinpatientswithdiabetesmellitusenrolledintheacceleratetrial AT kumaranirudh effectofcetpinhibitionwithevacetrapibinpatientswithdiabetesmellitusenrolledintheacceleratetrial AT pateldivyangr effectofcetpinhibitionwithevacetrapibinpatientswithdiabetesmellitusenrolledintheacceleratetrial AT stjohnjulie effectofcetpinhibitionwithevacetrapibinpatientswithdiabetesmellitusenrolledintheacceleratetrial AT riesmeyerjeffrey effectofcetpinhibitionwithevacetrapibinpatientswithdiabetesmellitusenrolledintheacceleratetrial AT weerakkodygovinda effectofcetpinhibitionwithevacetrapibinpatientswithdiabetesmellitusenrolledintheacceleratetrial AT ruotologiacomo effectofcetpinhibitionwithevacetrapibinpatientswithdiabetesmellitusenrolledintheacceleratetrial AT wolskikathye effectofcetpinhibitionwithevacetrapibinpatientswithdiabetesmellitusenrolledintheacceleratetrial AT mcerleanellen effectofcetpinhibitionwithevacetrapibinpatientswithdiabetesmellitusenrolledintheacceleratetrial AT cremerpaulc effectofcetpinhibitionwithevacetrapibinpatientswithdiabetesmellitusenrolledintheacceleratetrial AT nichollsstephenj effectofcetpinhibitionwithevacetrapibinpatientswithdiabetesmellitusenrolledintheacceleratetrial AT lincoffamichael effectofcetpinhibitionwithevacetrapibinpatientswithdiabetesmellitusenrolledintheacceleratetrial AT nissenstevene effectofcetpinhibitionwithevacetrapibinpatientswithdiabetesmellitusenrolledintheacceleratetrial |