Cargando…
Acute Alcohol Effects on Response Inhibition Depend on Response Automatization, but not on GABA or Glutamate Levels in the ACC and Striatum
Alcohol increases GABAergic signaling and decreases glutamatergic signaling in the brain. Variations in these neurotransmitter levels may modulate/predict executive functioning. Matching this, strong impairments of response inhibition are one of the most consistently reported cognitive/behavioral ef...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7073826/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32050509 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9020481 |
_version_ | 1783506707389874176 |
---|---|
author | Bensmann, Wiebke Zink, Nicolas Werner, Annett Beste, Christian Stock, Ann-Kathrin |
author_facet | Bensmann, Wiebke Zink, Nicolas Werner, Annett Beste, Christian Stock, Ann-Kathrin |
author_sort | Bensmann, Wiebke |
collection | PubMed |
description | Alcohol increases GABAergic signaling and decreases glutamatergic signaling in the brain. Variations in these neurotransmitter levels may modulate/predict executive functioning. Matching this, strong impairments of response inhibition are one of the most consistently reported cognitive/behavioral effects of acute alcohol intoxication. However, it has never been investigated whether baseline differences in these neurotransmitters allow to predict how much alcohol intoxication impairs response inhibition, and whether this is reflected in neurophysiological measures of cognitive control. We used MR spectroscopy to assess baseline (i.e., sober) GABA and glutamate levels in the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and striatum in n = 30 healthy young males, who were subsequently tested once sober and once intoxicated (1.01 permille). Inhibition was assessed with the sustained attention to response task (SART). This paradigm also allows to examine the effect of different degrees of response automatization, which is a known modulator for response inhibition, but does not seem to be substantially impaired during acute intoxication. As a neurophysiological correlate of response inhibition and control, we quantified EEG-derived theta band power and located its source using beamforming analyses. We found that alcohol-induced response inhibition deficits only occurred in the case of response automatization. This was reflected by decreased theta band activity in the left supplementary motor area (SMA), which may reflect modulations in the encoding of a surprise signal in response to inhibition cues. However, we did not find that differences in baseline (i.e., sober) GABA or glutamate levels significantly modulated differences in the size of alcohol-induced inhibition deficits. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7073826 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70738262020-03-19 Acute Alcohol Effects on Response Inhibition Depend on Response Automatization, but not on GABA or Glutamate Levels in the ACC and Striatum Bensmann, Wiebke Zink, Nicolas Werner, Annett Beste, Christian Stock, Ann-Kathrin J Clin Med Article Alcohol increases GABAergic signaling and decreases glutamatergic signaling in the brain. Variations in these neurotransmitter levels may modulate/predict executive functioning. Matching this, strong impairments of response inhibition are one of the most consistently reported cognitive/behavioral effects of acute alcohol intoxication. However, it has never been investigated whether baseline differences in these neurotransmitters allow to predict how much alcohol intoxication impairs response inhibition, and whether this is reflected in neurophysiological measures of cognitive control. We used MR spectroscopy to assess baseline (i.e., sober) GABA and glutamate levels in the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and striatum in n = 30 healthy young males, who were subsequently tested once sober and once intoxicated (1.01 permille). Inhibition was assessed with the sustained attention to response task (SART). This paradigm also allows to examine the effect of different degrees of response automatization, which is a known modulator for response inhibition, but does not seem to be substantially impaired during acute intoxication. As a neurophysiological correlate of response inhibition and control, we quantified EEG-derived theta band power and located its source using beamforming analyses. We found that alcohol-induced response inhibition deficits only occurred in the case of response automatization. This was reflected by decreased theta band activity in the left supplementary motor area (SMA), which may reflect modulations in the encoding of a surprise signal in response to inhibition cues. However, we did not find that differences in baseline (i.e., sober) GABA or glutamate levels significantly modulated differences in the size of alcohol-induced inhibition deficits. MDPI 2020-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7073826/ /pubmed/32050509 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9020481 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Bensmann, Wiebke Zink, Nicolas Werner, Annett Beste, Christian Stock, Ann-Kathrin Acute Alcohol Effects on Response Inhibition Depend on Response Automatization, but not on GABA or Glutamate Levels in the ACC and Striatum |
title | Acute Alcohol Effects on Response Inhibition Depend on Response Automatization, but not on GABA or Glutamate Levels in the ACC and Striatum |
title_full | Acute Alcohol Effects on Response Inhibition Depend on Response Automatization, but not on GABA or Glutamate Levels in the ACC and Striatum |
title_fullStr | Acute Alcohol Effects on Response Inhibition Depend on Response Automatization, but not on GABA or Glutamate Levels in the ACC and Striatum |
title_full_unstemmed | Acute Alcohol Effects on Response Inhibition Depend on Response Automatization, but not on GABA or Glutamate Levels in the ACC and Striatum |
title_short | Acute Alcohol Effects on Response Inhibition Depend on Response Automatization, but not on GABA or Glutamate Levels in the ACC and Striatum |
title_sort | acute alcohol effects on response inhibition depend on response automatization, but not on gaba or glutamate levels in the acc and striatum |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7073826/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32050509 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9020481 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bensmannwiebke acutealcoholeffectsonresponseinhibitiondependonresponseautomatizationbutnotongabaorglutamatelevelsintheaccandstriatum AT zinknicolas acutealcoholeffectsonresponseinhibitiondependonresponseautomatizationbutnotongabaorglutamatelevelsintheaccandstriatum AT wernerannett acutealcoholeffectsonresponseinhibitiondependonresponseautomatizationbutnotongabaorglutamatelevelsintheaccandstriatum AT bestechristian acutealcoholeffectsonresponseinhibitiondependonresponseautomatizationbutnotongabaorglutamatelevelsintheaccandstriatum AT stockannkathrin acutealcoholeffectsonresponseinhibitiondependonresponseautomatizationbutnotongabaorglutamatelevelsintheaccandstriatum |