Cargando…

Acute Alcohol Effects on Response Inhibition Depend on Response Automatization, but not on GABA or Glutamate Levels in the ACC and Striatum

Alcohol increases GABAergic signaling and decreases glutamatergic signaling in the brain. Variations in these neurotransmitter levels may modulate/predict executive functioning. Matching this, strong impairments of response inhibition are one of the most consistently reported cognitive/behavioral ef...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bensmann, Wiebke, Zink, Nicolas, Werner, Annett, Beste, Christian, Stock, Ann-Kathrin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7073826/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32050509
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9020481
_version_ 1783506707389874176
author Bensmann, Wiebke
Zink, Nicolas
Werner, Annett
Beste, Christian
Stock, Ann-Kathrin
author_facet Bensmann, Wiebke
Zink, Nicolas
Werner, Annett
Beste, Christian
Stock, Ann-Kathrin
author_sort Bensmann, Wiebke
collection PubMed
description Alcohol increases GABAergic signaling and decreases glutamatergic signaling in the brain. Variations in these neurotransmitter levels may modulate/predict executive functioning. Matching this, strong impairments of response inhibition are one of the most consistently reported cognitive/behavioral effects of acute alcohol intoxication. However, it has never been investigated whether baseline differences in these neurotransmitters allow to predict how much alcohol intoxication impairs response inhibition, and whether this is reflected in neurophysiological measures of cognitive control. We used MR spectroscopy to assess baseline (i.e., sober) GABA and glutamate levels in the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and striatum in n = 30 healthy young males, who were subsequently tested once sober and once intoxicated (1.01 permille). Inhibition was assessed with the sustained attention to response task (SART). This paradigm also allows to examine the effect of different degrees of response automatization, which is a known modulator for response inhibition, but does not seem to be substantially impaired during acute intoxication. As a neurophysiological correlate of response inhibition and control, we quantified EEG-derived theta band power and located its source using beamforming analyses. We found that alcohol-induced response inhibition deficits only occurred in the case of response automatization. This was reflected by decreased theta band activity in the left supplementary motor area (SMA), which may reflect modulations in the encoding of a surprise signal in response to inhibition cues. However, we did not find that differences in baseline (i.e., sober) GABA or glutamate levels significantly modulated differences in the size of alcohol-induced inhibition deficits.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7073826
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70738262020-03-19 Acute Alcohol Effects on Response Inhibition Depend on Response Automatization, but not on GABA or Glutamate Levels in the ACC and Striatum Bensmann, Wiebke Zink, Nicolas Werner, Annett Beste, Christian Stock, Ann-Kathrin J Clin Med Article Alcohol increases GABAergic signaling and decreases glutamatergic signaling in the brain. Variations in these neurotransmitter levels may modulate/predict executive functioning. Matching this, strong impairments of response inhibition are one of the most consistently reported cognitive/behavioral effects of acute alcohol intoxication. However, it has never been investigated whether baseline differences in these neurotransmitters allow to predict how much alcohol intoxication impairs response inhibition, and whether this is reflected in neurophysiological measures of cognitive control. We used MR spectroscopy to assess baseline (i.e., sober) GABA and glutamate levels in the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and striatum in n = 30 healthy young males, who were subsequently tested once sober and once intoxicated (1.01 permille). Inhibition was assessed with the sustained attention to response task (SART). This paradigm also allows to examine the effect of different degrees of response automatization, which is a known modulator for response inhibition, but does not seem to be substantially impaired during acute intoxication. As a neurophysiological correlate of response inhibition and control, we quantified EEG-derived theta band power and located its source using beamforming analyses. We found that alcohol-induced response inhibition deficits only occurred in the case of response automatization. This was reflected by decreased theta band activity in the left supplementary motor area (SMA), which may reflect modulations in the encoding of a surprise signal in response to inhibition cues. However, we did not find that differences in baseline (i.e., sober) GABA or glutamate levels significantly modulated differences in the size of alcohol-induced inhibition deficits. MDPI 2020-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7073826/ /pubmed/32050509 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9020481 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Bensmann, Wiebke
Zink, Nicolas
Werner, Annett
Beste, Christian
Stock, Ann-Kathrin
Acute Alcohol Effects on Response Inhibition Depend on Response Automatization, but not on GABA or Glutamate Levels in the ACC and Striatum
title Acute Alcohol Effects on Response Inhibition Depend on Response Automatization, but not on GABA or Glutamate Levels in the ACC and Striatum
title_full Acute Alcohol Effects on Response Inhibition Depend on Response Automatization, but not on GABA or Glutamate Levels in the ACC and Striatum
title_fullStr Acute Alcohol Effects on Response Inhibition Depend on Response Automatization, but not on GABA or Glutamate Levels in the ACC and Striatum
title_full_unstemmed Acute Alcohol Effects on Response Inhibition Depend on Response Automatization, but not on GABA or Glutamate Levels in the ACC and Striatum
title_short Acute Alcohol Effects on Response Inhibition Depend on Response Automatization, but not on GABA or Glutamate Levels in the ACC and Striatum
title_sort acute alcohol effects on response inhibition depend on response automatization, but not on gaba or glutamate levels in the acc and striatum
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7073826/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32050509
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9020481
work_keys_str_mv AT bensmannwiebke acutealcoholeffectsonresponseinhibitiondependonresponseautomatizationbutnotongabaorglutamatelevelsintheaccandstriatum
AT zinknicolas acutealcoholeffectsonresponseinhibitiondependonresponseautomatizationbutnotongabaorglutamatelevelsintheaccandstriatum
AT wernerannett acutealcoholeffectsonresponseinhibitiondependonresponseautomatizationbutnotongabaorglutamatelevelsintheaccandstriatum
AT bestechristian acutealcoholeffectsonresponseinhibitiondependonresponseautomatizationbutnotongabaorglutamatelevelsintheaccandstriatum
AT stockannkathrin acutealcoholeffectsonresponseinhibitiondependonresponseautomatizationbutnotongabaorglutamatelevelsintheaccandstriatum