Cargando…
The Snacking Chameleon: Psychological Proximity Increases Imitation of Food Intake Independently of Brand Choice
Observing other people snacking can affect one’s own consumption behavior. The present experiment tested whether temporal distance moderates imitation of brand choice and the number of snacks consumed. Based on previous research demonstrating that psychological distance (e.g., temporal or spatial di...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7074025/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32098066 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods9020228 |
_version_ | 1783506744753782784 |
---|---|
author | Bischoff, Claudia Reutner, Leonie Hansen, Jochim |
author_facet | Bischoff, Claudia Reutner, Leonie Hansen, Jochim |
author_sort | Bischoff, Claudia |
collection | PubMed |
description | Observing other people snacking can affect one’s own consumption behavior. The present experiment tested whether temporal distance moderates imitation of brand choice and the number of snacks consumed. Based on previous research demonstrating that psychological distance (e.g., temporal or spatial distance) reduces imitation of movements, we hypothesized that participants would imitate the amount of food intake to a lesser degree when they temporally distance themselves from a model person. To test this idea, participants (n = 113) were asked to imagine their life either the next day (proximal condition) or in one year (distant condition). Next, participants watched a video clip depicting a model person who chose one of two brands of pretzels and ate either plenty or just a few of the pretzels. Then, participants chose one of the two brands of pretzels, served themselves as many of the pretzels as they liked, and ate them while filling in a tasting questionnaire. As expected, participants primed with proximity imitated snack intake more than participants primed with distance. The brand choice was not affected by self-distancing. Implications for snacking behavior are discussed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7074025 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70740252020-03-19 The Snacking Chameleon: Psychological Proximity Increases Imitation of Food Intake Independently of Brand Choice Bischoff, Claudia Reutner, Leonie Hansen, Jochim Foods Brief Report Observing other people snacking can affect one’s own consumption behavior. The present experiment tested whether temporal distance moderates imitation of brand choice and the number of snacks consumed. Based on previous research demonstrating that psychological distance (e.g., temporal or spatial distance) reduces imitation of movements, we hypothesized that participants would imitate the amount of food intake to a lesser degree when they temporally distance themselves from a model person. To test this idea, participants (n = 113) were asked to imagine their life either the next day (proximal condition) or in one year (distant condition). Next, participants watched a video clip depicting a model person who chose one of two brands of pretzels and ate either plenty or just a few of the pretzels. Then, participants chose one of the two brands of pretzels, served themselves as many of the pretzels as they liked, and ate them while filling in a tasting questionnaire. As expected, participants primed with proximity imitated snack intake more than participants primed with distance. The brand choice was not affected by self-distancing. Implications for snacking behavior are discussed. MDPI 2020-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7074025/ /pubmed/32098066 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods9020228 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Brief Report Bischoff, Claudia Reutner, Leonie Hansen, Jochim The Snacking Chameleon: Psychological Proximity Increases Imitation of Food Intake Independently of Brand Choice |
title | The Snacking Chameleon: Psychological Proximity Increases Imitation of Food Intake Independently of Brand Choice |
title_full | The Snacking Chameleon: Psychological Proximity Increases Imitation of Food Intake Independently of Brand Choice |
title_fullStr | The Snacking Chameleon: Psychological Proximity Increases Imitation of Food Intake Independently of Brand Choice |
title_full_unstemmed | The Snacking Chameleon: Psychological Proximity Increases Imitation of Food Intake Independently of Brand Choice |
title_short | The Snacking Chameleon: Psychological Proximity Increases Imitation of Food Intake Independently of Brand Choice |
title_sort | snacking chameleon: psychological proximity increases imitation of food intake independently of brand choice |
topic | Brief Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7074025/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32098066 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods9020228 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bischoffclaudia thesnackingchameleonpsychologicalproximityincreasesimitationoffoodintakeindependentlyofbrandchoice AT reutnerleonie thesnackingchameleonpsychologicalproximityincreasesimitationoffoodintakeindependentlyofbrandchoice AT hansenjochim thesnackingchameleonpsychologicalproximityincreasesimitationoffoodintakeindependentlyofbrandchoice AT bischoffclaudia snackingchameleonpsychologicalproximityincreasesimitationoffoodintakeindependentlyofbrandchoice AT reutnerleonie snackingchameleonpsychologicalproximityincreasesimitationoffoodintakeindependentlyofbrandchoice AT hansenjochim snackingchameleonpsychologicalproximityincreasesimitationoffoodintakeindependentlyofbrandchoice |