Cargando…

Effect of Phenotype Selection on Genome Size Variation in Two Species of Diptera

Genome size varies widely across organisms yet has not been found to be related to organismal complexity in eukaryotes. While there is no evidence for a relationship with complexity, there is evidence to suggest that other phenotypic characteristics, such as nucleus size and cell-cycle time, are ass...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hjelmen, Carl E., Parrott, Jonathan J., Srivastav, Satyam P., McGuane, Alexander S., Ellis, Lisa L., Stewart, Andrew D., Johnston, J. Spencer, Tarone, Aaron M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7074110/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32093067
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes11020218
_version_ 1783506764265684992
author Hjelmen, Carl E.
Parrott, Jonathan J.
Srivastav, Satyam P.
McGuane, Alexander S.
Ellis, Lisa L.
Stewart, Andrew D.
Johnston, J. Spencer
Tarone, Aaron M.
author_facet Hjelmen, Carl E.
Parrott, Jonathan J.
Srivastav, Satyam P.
McGuane, Alexander S.
Ellis, Lisa L.
Stewart, Andrew D.
Johnston, J. Spencer
Tarone, Aaron M.
author_sort Hjelmen, Carl E.
collection PubMed
description Genome size varies widely across organisms yet has not been found to be related to organismal complexity in eukaryotes. While there is no evidence for a relationship with complexity, there is evidence to suggest that other phenotypic characteristics, such as nucleus size and cell-cycle time, are associated with genome size, body size, and development rate. However, what is unknown is how the selection for divergent phenotypic traits may indirectly affect genome size. Drosophila melanogaster were selected for small and large body size for up to 220 generations, while Cochliomyia macellaria were selected for 32 generations for fast and slow development. Size in D. melanogaster significantly changed in terms of both cell-count and genome size in isolines, but only the cell-count changed in lines which were maintained at larger effective population sizes. Larger genome sizes only occurred in a subset of D. melanogaster isolines originated from flies selected for their large body size. Selection for development time did not change average genome size yet decreased the within-population variation in genome size with increasing generations of selection. This decrease in variation and convergence on a similar mean genome size was not in correspondence with phenotypic variation and suggests stabilizing selection on genome size in laboratory conditions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7074110
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70741102020-03-19 Effect of Phenotype Selection on Genome Size Variation in Two Species of Diptera Hjelmen, Carl E. Parrott, Jonathan J. Srivastav, Satyam P. McGuane, Alexander S. Ellis, Lisa L. Stewart, Andrew D. Johnston, J. Spencer Tarone, Aaron M. Genes (Basel) Article Genome size varies widely across organisms yet has not been found to be related to organismal complexity in eukaryotes. While there is no evidence for a relationship with complexity, there is evidence to suggest that other phenotypic characteristics, such as nucleus size and cell-cycle time, are associated with genome size, body size, and development rate. However, what is unknown is how the selection for divergent phenotypic traits may indirectly affect genome size. Drosophila melanogaster were selected for small and large body size for up to 220 generations, while Cochliomyia macellaria were selected for 32 generations for fast and slow development. Size in D. melanogaster significantly changed in terms of both cell-count and genome size in isolines, but only the cell-count changed in lines which were maintained at larger effective population sizes. Larger genome sizes only occurred in a subset of D. melanogaster isolines originated from flies selected for their large body size. Selection for development time did not change average genome size yet decreased the within-population variation in genome size with increasing generations of selection. This decrease in variation and convergence on a similar mean genome size was not in correspondence with phenotypic variation and suggests stabilizing selection on genome size in laboratory conditions. MDPI 2020-02-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7074110/ /pubmed/32093067 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes11020218 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Hjelmen, Carl E.
Parrott, Jonathan J.
Srivastav, Satyam P.
McGuane, Alexander S.
Ellis, Lisa L.
Stewart, Andrew D.
Johnston, J. Spencer
Tarone, Aaron M.
Effect of Phenotype Selection on Genome Size Variation in Two Species of Diptera
title Effect of Phenotype Selection on Genome Size Variation in Two Species of Diptera
title_full Effect of Phenotype Selection on Genome Size Variation in Two Species of Diptera
title_fullStr Effect of Phenotype Selection on Genome Size Variation in Two Species of Diptera
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Phenotype Selection on Genome Size Variation in Two Species of Diptera
title_short Effect of Phenotype Selection on Genome Size Variation in Two Species of Diptera
title_sort effect of phenotype selection on genome size variation in two species of diptera
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7074110/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32093067
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes11020218
work_keys_str_mv AT hjelmencarle effectofphenotypeselectionongenomesizevariationintwospeciesofdiptera
AT parrottjonathanj effectofphenotypeselectionongenomesizevariationintwospeciesofdiptera
AT srivastavsatyamp effectofphenotypeselectionongenomesizevariationintwospeciesofdiptera
AT mcguanealexanders effectofphenotypeselectionongenomesizevariationintwospeciesofdiptera
AT ellislisal effectofphenotypeselectionongenomesizevariationintwospeciesofdiptera
AT stewartandrewd effectofphenotypeselectionongenomesizevariationintwospeciesofdiptera
AT johnstonjspencer effectofphenotypeselectionongenomesizevariationintwospeciesofdiptera
AT taroneaaronm effectofphenotypeselectionongenomesizevariationintwospeciesofdiptera