Cargando…

Timing of changing therapy from gemcitabine and cisplatin chemotherapy based on real-world data of advanced urothelial carcinoma

Cisplatin-based systemic chemotherapy is the gold-standard approach for the first-line treatment of patients with advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC). However, the optimal number of cycles is still unclear. The current study retrospectively assessed the clinical outcome in patients who...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Furubayashi, Nobuki, Negishi, Takahito, Takamatsu, Dai, Ieiri, Kosuke, Inoue, Tomohiro, Tsukino, Keiji, Nakamura, Motonobu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: D.A. Spandidos 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7074169/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32256805
http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/ol.2020.11368
_version_ 1783506775813652480
author Furubayashi, Nobuki
Negishi, Takahito
Takamatsu, Dai
Ieiri, Kosuke
Inoue, Tomohiro
Tsukino, Keiji
Nakamura, Motonobu
author_facet Furubayashi, Nobuki
Negishi, Takahito
Takamatsu, Dai
Ieiri, Kosuke
Inoue, Tomohiro
Tsukino, Keiji
Nakamura, Motonobu
author_sort Furubayashi, Nobuki
collection PubMed
description Cisplatin-based systemic chemotherapy is the gold-standard approach for the first-line treatment of patients with advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC). However, the optimal number of cycles is still unclear. The current study retrospectively assessed the clinical outcome in patients who received gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) chemotherapy as first-line treatment for metastatic urothelial cancer to clarify the timing of switching from GC therapy. A total of 61 patients with locally advanced or metastatic UC who received first-line chemotherapy with GC were retrospectively reviewed at National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center between June 2009 and August 2017. The progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The significance of associations between the clinical parameters and OS was assessed using the Cox proportional hazards regression model. The median cycle number for GC chemotherapy was 4. The median PFS and OS of all cases was 5.2 and 14.1 months, respectively. The multivariate analyses revealed that a neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio ≥3.0 (hazard ratio [HR], 2.521, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.179–5.624; P=0.017) and best response to GC therapy of CR+PR (HR 0.110; 95% CI=0.028–0.411; P<0.001) were independent prognostic factors. However, the number of GC cycles (≤4 vs. >4) was not an independent prognostic factor (P=0.387). The current retrospective study indicated that changes to therapy should be considered at an early stage for cases with a therapeutic effect of SD or less, regardless of the number of GC therapy cycles.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7074169
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher D.A. Spandidos
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70741692020-03-31 Timing of changing therapy from gemcitabine and cisplatin chemotherapy based on real-world data of advanced urothelial carcinoma Furubayashi, Nobuki Negishi, Takahito Takamatsu, Dai Ieiri, Kosuke Inoue, Tomohiro Tsukino, Keiji Nakamura, Motonobu Oncol Lett Articles Cisplatin-based systemic chemotherapy is the gold-standard approach for the first-line treatment of patients with advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC). However, the optimal number of cycles is still unclear. The current study retrospectively assessed the clinical outcome in patients who received gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) chemotherapy as first-line treatment for metastatic urothelial cancer to clarify the timing of switching from GC therapy. A total of 61 patients with locally advanced or metastatic UC who received first-line chemotherapy with GC were retrospectively reviewed at National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center between June 2009 and August 2017. The progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The significance of associations between the clinical parameters and OS was assessed using the Cox proportional hazards regression model. The median cycle number for GC chemotherapy was 4. The median PFS and OS of all cases was 5.2 and 14.1 months, respectively. The multivariate analyses revealed that a neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio ≥3.0 (hazard ratio [HR], 2.521, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.179–5.624; P=0.017) and best response to GC therapy of CR+PR (HR 0.110; 95% CI=0.028–0.411; P<0.001) were independent prognostic factors. However, the number of GC cycles (≤4 vs. >4) was not an independent prognostic factor (P=0.387). The current retrospective study indicated that changes to therapy should be considered at an early stage for cases with a therapeutic effect of SD or less, regardless of the number of GC therapy cycles. D.A. Spandidos 2020-04 2020-02-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7074169/ /pubmed/32256805 http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/ol.2020.11368 Text en Copyright: © Furubayashi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Articles
Furubayashi, Nobuki
Negishi, Takahito
Takamatsu, Dai
Ieiri, Kosuke
Inoue, Tomohiro
Tsukino, Keiji
Nakamura, Motonobu
Timing of changing therapy from gemcitabine and cisplatin chemotherapy based on real-world data of advanced urothelial carcinoma
title Timing of changing therapy from gemcitabine and cisplatin chemotherapy based on real-world data of advanced urothelial carcinoma
title_full Timing of changing therapy from gemcitabine and cisplatin chemotherapy based on real-world data of advanced urothelial carcinoma
title_fullStr Timing of changing therapy from gemcitabine and cisplatin chemotherapy based on real-world data of advanced urothelial carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Timing of changing therapy from gemcitabine and cisplatin chemotherapy based on real-world data of advanced urothelial carcinoma
title_short Timing of changing therapy from gemcitabine and cisplatin chemotherapy based on real-world data of advanced urothelial carcinoma
title_sort timing of changing therapy from gemcitabine and cisplatin chemotherapy based on real-world data of advanced urothelial carcinoma
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7074169/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32256805
http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/ol.2020.11368
work_keys_str_mv AT furubayashinobuki timingofchangingtherapyfromgemcitabineandcisplatinchemotherapybasedonrealworlddataofadvancedurothelialcarcinoma
AT negishitakahito timingofchangingtherapyfromgemcitabineandcisplatinchemotherapybasedonrealworlddataofadvancedurothelialcarcinoma
AT takamatsudai timingofchangingtherapyfromgemcitabineandcisplatinchemotherapybasedonrealworlddataofadvancedurothelialcarcinoma
AT ieirikosuke timingofchangingtherapyfromgemcitabineandcisplatinchemotherapybasedonrealworlddataofadvancedurothelialcarcinoma
AT inouetomohiro timingofchangingtherapyfromgemcitabineandcisplatinchemotherapybasedonrealworlddataofadvancedurothelialcarcinoma
AT tsukinokeiji timingofchangingtherapyfromgemcitabineandcisplatinchemotherapybasedonrealworlddataofadvancedurothelialcarcinoma
AT nakamuramotonobu timingofchangingtherapyfromgemcitabineandcisplatinchemotherapybasedonrealworlddataofadvancedurothelialcarcinoma