Cargando…

Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) Immune Responses with Different Feeding Regimes Following Infection by the Entomopathogenic Fungus Metarhizium anisopliae

The mosquito Aedes aegypti is the most notorious vector of illness-causing viruses. The use of entomopathogenic fungi as bioinsecticides is a promising alternative for the development of novel mosquito control strategies. We investigate whether differences in immune responses could be responsible fo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cabral, Sara, de Paula, Adriano, Samuels, Richard, da Fonseca, Rodrigo, Gomes, Simone, Silva, José Roberto, Mury, Flávia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7074208/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32024202
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/insects11020095
_version_ 1783506783573114880
author Cabral, Sara
de Paula, Adriano
Samuels, Richard
da Fonseca, Rodrigo
Gomes, Simone
Silva, José Roberto
Mury, Flávia
author_facet Cabral, Sara
de Paula, Adriano
Samuels, Richard
da Fonseca, Rodrigo
Gomes, Simone
Silva, José Roberto
Mury, Flávia
author_sort Cabral, Sara
collection PubMed
description The mosquito Aedes aegypti is the most notorious vector of illness-causing viruses. The use of entomopathogenic fungi as bioinsecticides is a promising alternative for the development of novel mosquito control strategies. We investigate whether differences in immune responses could be responsible for modifications in survival rates of insects following different feeding regimes. Sucrose and blood-fed adult A. aegypti females were sprayed with M. anisopliae 1 × 10(6) conidia mL(−1), and after 48 h, the midgut and fat body were dissected. We used RT-qPCR to monitor the expression of Cactus and REL1 (Toll pathway), IMD, REL2, and Caspar (IMD pathway), STAT and PIAS (JAK-STAT pathway), as well as the expression of antimicrobial peptides (Defensin A, Attacin and Cecropin G). REL1 and REL2 expression in both the midgut and fat body were higher in blood-fed fungus-challenged A. aegypti than in sucrose-fed counterparts. Interestingly, infection of sucrose-fed insects induced Cactus expression in the fat body, a negative regulator of the Toll pathway. The IMD gene was upregulated in the fat body in response to fungal infection after a blood meal. Additionally, we observed the induction of antimicrobial peptides in the blood-fed fungus-challenged insects. This study suggests that blood-fed A. aegypti are less susceptible to fungal infection due to the rapid induction of Toll and IMD immune pathways.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7074208
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70742082020-03-19 Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) Immune Responses with Different Feeding Regimes Following Infection by the Entomopathogenic Fungus Metarhizium anisopliae Cabral, Sara de Paula, Adriano Samuels, Richard da Fonseca, Rodrigo Gomes, Simone Silva, José Roberto Mury, Flávia Insects Article The mosquito Aedes aegypti is the most notorious vector of illness-causing viruses. The use of entomopathogenic fungi as bioinsecticides is a promising alternative for the development of novel mosquito control strategies. We investigate whether differences in immune responses could be responsible for modifications in survival rates of insects following different feeding regimes. Sucrose and blood-fed adult A. aegypti females were sprayed with M. anisopliae 1 × 10(6) conidia mL(−1), and after 48 h, the midgut and fat body were dissected. We used RT-qPCR to monitor the expression of Cactus and REL1 (Toll pathway), IMD, REL2, and Caspar (IMD pathway), STAT and PIAS (JAK-STAT pathway), as well as the expression of antimicrobial peptides (Defensin A, Attacin and Cecropin G). REL1 and REL2 expression in both the midgut and fat body were higher in blood-fed fungus-challenged A. aegypti than in sucrose-fed counterparts. Interestingly, infection of sucrose-fed insects induced Cactus expression in the fat body, a negative regulator of the Toll pathway. The IMD gene was upregulated in the fat body in response to fungal infection after a blood meal. Additionally, we observed the induction of antimicrobial peptides in the blood-fed fungus-challenged insects. This study suggests that blood-fed A. aegypti are less susceptible to fungal infection due to the rapid induction of Toll and IMD immune pathways. MDPI 2020-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7074208/ /pubmed/32024202 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/insects11020095 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Cabral, Sara
de Paula, Adriano
Samuels, Richard
da Fonseca, Rodrigo
Gomes, Simone
Silva, José Roberto
Mury, Flávia
Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) Immune Responses with Different Feeding Regimes Following Infection by the Entomopathogenic Fungus Metarhizium anisopliae
title Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) Immune Responses with Different Feeding Regimes Following Infection by the Entomopathogenic Fungus Metarhizium anisopliae
title_full Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) Immune Responses with Different Feeding Regimes Following Infection by the Entomopathogenic Fungus Metarhizium anisopliae
title_fullStr Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) Immune Responses with Different Feeding Regimes Following Infection by the Entomopathogenic Fungus Metarhizium anisopliae
title_full_unstemmed Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) Immune Responses with Different Feeding Regimes Following Infection by the Entomopathogenic Fungus Metarhizium anisopliae
title_short Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) Immune Responses with Different Feeding Regimes Following Infection by the Entomopathogenic Fungus Metarhizium anisopliae
title_sort aedes aegypti (diptera: culicidae) immune responses with different feeding regimes following infection by the entomopathogenic fungus metarhizium anisopliae
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7074208/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32024202
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/insects11020095
work_keys_str_mv AT cabralsara aedesaegyptidipteraculicidaeimmuneresponseswithdifferentfeedingregimesfollowinginfectionbytheentomopathogenicfungusmetarhiziumanisopliae
AT depaulaadriano aedesaegyptidipteraculicidaeimmuneresponseswithdifferentfeedingregimesfollowinginfectionbytheentomopathogenicfungusmetarhiziumanisopliae
AT samuelsrichard aedesaegyptidipteraculicidaeimmuneresponseswithdifferentfeedingregimesfollowinginfectionbytheentomopathogenicfungusmetarhiziumanisopliae
AT dafonsecarodrigo aedesaegyptidipteraculicidaeimmuneresponseswithdifferentfeedingregimesfollowinginfectionbytheentomopathogenicfungusmetarhiziumanisopliae
AT gomessimone aedesaegyptidipteraculicidaeimmuneresponseswithdifferentfeedingregimesfollowinginfectionbytheentomopathogenicfungusmetarhiziumanisopliae
AT silvajoseroberto aedesaegyptidipteraculicidaeimmuneresponseswithdifferentfeedingregimesfollowinginfectionbytheentomopathogenicfungusmetarhiziumanisopliae
AT muryflavia aedesaegyptidipteraculicidaeimmuneresponseswithdifferentfeedingregimesfollowinginfectionbytheentomopathogenicfungusmetarhiziumanisopliae