Cargando…
Clinical Performance of Zygomatic Implants—Retrospective Multicenter Study
The main objective of this analysis was to evaluate (1) implant survival, (2) biologic complications, and (3) demographics associated with zygomatic implants placed according to the zygomatic anatomy-guided approach (ZAGA). This retrospective multicenter study reviewed data from the charts of 82 con...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7074322/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32050501 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9020480 |
_version_ | 1783506807366352896 |
---|---|
author | Davó, Ruben Bankauskas, Simonas Laurincikas, Remigijus Koçyigit, Ismail Doruk Mate Sanchez de Val, José Eduardo |
author_facet | Davó, Ruben Bankauskas, Simonas Laurincikas, Remigijus Koçyigit, Ismail Doruk Mate Sanchez de Val, José Eduardo |
author_sort | Davó, Ruben |
collection | PubMed |
description | The main objective of this analysis was to evaluate (1) implant survival, (2) biologic complications, and (3) demographics associated with zygomatic implants placed according to the zygomatic anatomy-guided approach (ZAGA). This retrospective multicenter study reviewed data from the charts of 82 consecutive patients who had received 182 zygomatic implants. Patients were fully edentulous (62.2%), partially edentulous (22.0%), or had failing dentition (15.9%). Most patients (87.5%) did not have previous sinusitis and 11.3% had been previously treated for it. Additionally, about half of the patients (53.8%) did not present periodontal pathology, and one-third (36.3%) did, but were subsequently treated. Most implants (93.8%) were loaded immediately, i.e., within 48 h of placement. Implants were followed for 10.5 ± 7.2 months, and all were recorded as surviving and stable at last follow-up. Post-operative complications were infrequent and included sinusitis (10.1%) and peri-implant hyperplasia (0.8%). The low complication rate and 100% implant survival and stability indicate that zygomatic implants offer a viable treatment option when performing graftless restoration of severely resorbed maxilla, including immediate loading protocols. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7074322 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70743222020-03-19 Clinical Performance of Zygomatic Implants—Retrospective Multicenter Study Davó, Ruben Bankauskas, Simonas Laurincikas, Remigijus Koçyigit, Ismail Doruk Mate Sanchez de Val, José Eduardo J Clin Med Article The main objective of this analysis was to evaluate (1) implant survival, (2) biologic complications, and (3) demographics associated with zygomatic implants placed according to the zygomatic anatomy-guided approach (ZAGA). This retrospective multicenter study reviewed data from the charts of 82 consecutive patients who had received 182 zygomatic implants. Patients were fully edentulous (62.2%), partially edentulous (22.0%), or had failing dentition (15.9%). Most patients (87.5%) did not have previous sinusitis and 11.3% had been previously treated for it. Additionally, about half of the patients (53.8%) did not present periodontal pathology, and one-third (36.3%) did, but were subsequently treated. Most implants (93.8%) were loaded immediately, i.e., within 48 h of placement. Implants were followed for 10.5 ± 7.2 months, and all were recorded as surviving and stable at last follow-up. Post-operative complications were infrequent and included sinusitis (10.1%) and peri-implant hyperplasia (0.8%). The low complication rate and 100% implant survival and stability indicate that zygomatic implants offer a viable treatment option when performing graftless restoration of severely resorbed maxilla, including immediate loading protocols. MDPI 2020-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7074322/ /pubmed/32050501 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9020480 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Davó, Ruben Bankauskas, Simonas Laurincikas, Remigijus Koçyigit, Ismail Doruk Mate Sanchez de Val, José Eduardo Clinical Performance of Zygomatic Implants—Retrospective Multicenter Study |
title | Clinical Performance of Zygomatic Implants—Retrospective Multicenter Study |
title_full | Clinical Performance of Zygomatic Implants—Retrospective Multicenter Study |
title_fullStr | Clinical Performance of Zygomatic Implants—Retrospective Multicenter Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical Performance of Zygomatic Implants—Retrospective Multicenter Study |
title_short | Clinical Performance of Zygomatic Implants—Retrospective Multicenter Study |
title_sort | clinical performance of zygomatic implants—retrospective multicenter study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7074322/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32050501 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9020480 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT davoruben clinicalperformanceofzygomaticimplantsretrospectivemulticenterstudy AT bankauskassimonas clinicalperformanceofzygomaticimplantsretrospectivemulticenterstudy AT laurincikasremigijus clinicalperformanceofzygomaticimplantsretrospectivemulticenterstudy AT kocyigitismaildoruk clinicalperformanceofzygomaticimplantsretrospectivemulticenterstudy AT matesanchezdevaljoseeduardo clinicalperformanceofzygomaticimplantsretrospectivemulticenterstudy |