Cargando…

Clinical Performance of Zygomatic Implants—Retrospective Multicenter Study

The main objective of this analysis was to evaluate (1) implant survival, (2) biologic complications, and (3) demographics associated with zygomatic implants placed according to the zygomatic anatomy-guided approach (ZAGA). This retrospective multicenter study reviewed data from the charts of 82 con...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Davó, Ruben, Bankauskas, Simonas, Laurincikas, Remigijus, Koçyigit, Ismail Doruk, Mate Sanchez de Val, José Eduardo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7074322/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32050501
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9020480
_version_ 1783506807366352896
author Davó, Ruben
Bankauskas, Simonas
Laurincikas, Remigijus
Koçyigit, Ismail Doruk
Mate Sanchez de Val, José Eduardo
author_facet Davó, Ruben
Bankauskas, Simonas
Laurincikas, Remigijus
Koçyigit, Ismail Doruk
Mate Sanchez de Val, José Eduardo
author_sort Davó, Ruben
collection PubMed
description The main objective of this analysis was to evaluate (1) implant survival, (2) biologic complications, and (3) demographics associated with zygomatic implants placed according to the zygomatic anatomy-guided approach (ZAGA). This retrospective multicenter study reviewed data from the charts of 82 consecutive patients who had received 182 zygomatic implants. Patients were fully edentulous (62.2%), partially edentulous (22.0%), or had failing dentition (15.9%). Most patients (87.5%) did not have previous sinusitis and 11.3% had been previously treated for it. Additionally, about half of the patients (53.8%) did not present periodontal pathology, and one-third (36.3%) did, but were subsequently treated. Most implants (93.8%) were loaded immediately, i.e., within 48 h of placement. Implants were followed for 10.5 ± 7.2 months, and all were recorded as surviving and stable at last follow-up. Post-operative complications were infrequent and included sinusitis (10.1%) and peri-implant hyperplasia (0.8%). The low complication rate and 100% implant survival and stability indicate that zygomatic implants offer a viable treatment option when performing graftless restoration of severely resorbed maxilla, including immediate loading protocols.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7074322
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70743222020-03-19 Clinical Performance of Zygomatic Implants—Retrospective Multicenter Study Davó, Ruben Bankauskas, Simonas Laurincikas, Remigijus Koçyigit, Ismail Doruk Mate Sanchez de Val, José Eduardo J Clin Med Article The main objective of this analysis was to evaluate (1) implant survival, (2) biologic complications, and (3) demographics associated with zygomatic implants placed according to the zygomatic anatomy-guided approach (ZAGA). This retrospective multicenter study reviewed data from the charts of 82 consecutive patients who had received 182 zygomatic implants. Patients were fully edentulous (62.2%), partially edentulous (22.0%), or had failing dentition (15.9%). Most patients (87.5%) did not have previous sinusitis and 11.3% had been previously treated for it. Additionally, about half of the patients (53.8%) did not present periodontal pathology, and one-third (36.3%) did, but were subsequently treated. Most implants (93.8%) were loaded immediately, i.e., within 48 h of placement. Implants were followed for 10.5 ± 7.2 months, and all were recorded as surviving and stable at last follow-up. Post-operative complications were infrequent and included sinusitis (10.1%) and peri-implant hyperplasia (0.8%). The low complication rate and 100% implant survival and stability indicate that zygomatic implants offer a viable treatment option when performing graftless restoration of severely resorbed maxilla, including immediate loading protocols. MDPI 2020-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7074322/ /pubmed/32050501 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9020480 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Davó, Ruben
Bankauskas, Simonas
Laurincikas, Remigijus
Koçyigit, Ismail Doruk
Mate Sanchez de Val, José Eduardo
Clinical Performance of Zygomatic Implants—Retrospective Multicenter Study
title Clinical Performance of Zygomatic Implants—Retrospective Multicenter Study
title_full Clinical Performance of Zygomatic Implants—Retrospective Multicenter Study
title_fullStr Clinical Performance of Zygomatic Implants—Retrospective Multicenter Study
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Performance of Zygomatic Implants—Retrospective Multicenter Study
title_short Clinical Performance of Zygomatic Implants—Retrospective Multicenter Study
title_sort clinical performance of zygomatic implants—retrospective multicenter study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7074322/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32050501
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9020480
work_keys_str_mv AT davoruben clinicalperformanceofzygomaticimplantsretrospectivemulticenterstudy
AT bankauskassimonas clinicalperformanceofzygomaticimplantsretrospectivemulticenterstudy
AT laurincikasremigijus clinicalperformanceofzygomaticimplantsretrospectivemulticenterstudy
AT kocyigitismaildoruk clinicalperformanceofzygomaticimplantsretrospectivemulticenterstudy
AT matesanchezdevaljoseeduardo clinicalperformanceofzygomaticimplantsretrospectivemulticenterstudy