Cargando…

A Mixed Method Approach for the Investigation of Consumer Responses to Sheepmeat and Beef

Coupling qualitative and quantitative consumer research methodologies enables the development of more holistic and comprehensive perspectives of consumer responses. In this study, consumer responses to beef and sheepmeat were investigated using a mixed method approach combining perceptual mapping (q...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hastie, Melindee, Ashman, Hollis, Torrico, Damir, Ha, Minh, Warner, Robyn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7074361/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31991694
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods9020126
_version_ 1783506816336920576
author Hastie, Melindee
Ashman, Hollis
Torrico, Damir
Ha, Minh
Warner, Robyn
author_facet Hastie, Melindee
Ashman, Hollis
Torrico, Damir
Ha, Minh
Warner, Robyn
author_sort Hastie, Melindee
collection PubMed
description Coupling qualitative and quantitative consumer research methodologies enables the development of more holistic and comprehensive perspectives of consumer responses. In this study, consumer responses to beef and sheepmeat were investigated using a mixed method approach combining perceptual mapping (qualitative), and sensory (quantitative) methodologies. Qualitative insights indicated Australian and Asian consumers differ in perception of familiarity and ‘premiumness’ of meat products. Specific findings included: Australians consume grilled or roasted meat as a centre of the plate ‘hero’ ingredient, while Asians prefer stovetop cooking methods where meat is one ingredient in a complex dish. Labelling meat as ‘Australian’ was important for Australian consumers but not for Asian consumers. Quantitative data demonstrated that older consumers (31–70 years) scored sheepmeat higher than younger consumers (18–30 years) for healthiness (p = 0.004), juiciness (p = 0.029), odour liking (p = 0.005) and tenderness (p = 0.042). Older consumers also had a lower willingness to pay than younger consumers for “premium” quality meat; 30–40 vs. 40–50 AUD (Australian dollar) per kg respectively for sheepmeat, and 40–50 vs. 50–60 AUD per kg respectively for beef. In conclusion, the approach used effectively integrated consumer attitudes, usage information and sensory assessments with socio-demographic factors to generate insights for the refinement of market strategies and product offerings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7074361
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70743612020-03-20 A Mixed Method Approach for the Investigation of Consumer Responses to Sheepmeat and Beef Hastie, Melindee Ashman, Hollis Torrico, Damir Ha, Minh Warner, Robyn Foods Article Coupling qualitative and quantitative consumer research methodologies enables the development of more holistic and comprehensive perspectives of consumer responses. In this study, consumer responses to beef and sheepmeat were investigated using a mixed method approach combining perceptual mapping (qualitative), and sensory (quantitative) methodologies. Qualitative insights indicated Australian and Asian consumers differ in perception of familiarity and ‘premiumness’ of meat products. Specific findings included: Australians consume grilled or roasted meat as a centre of the plate ‘hero’ ingredient, while Asians prefer stovetop cooking methods where meat is one ingredient in a complex dish. Labelling meat as ‘Australian’ was important for Australian consumers but not for Asian consumers. Quantitative data demonstrated that older consumers (31–70 years) scored sheepmeat higher than younger consumers (18–30 years) for healthiness (p = 0.004), juiciness (p = 0.029), odour liking (p = 0.005) and tenderness (p = 0.042). Older consumers also had a lower willingness to pay than younger consumers for “premium” quality meat; 30–40 vs. 40–50 AUD (Australian dollar) per kg respectively for sheepmeat, and 40–50 vs. 50–60 AUD per kg respectively for beef. In conclusion, the approach used effectively integrated consumer attitudes, usage information and sensory assessments with socio-demographic factors to generate insights for the refinement of market strategies and product offerings. MDPI 2020-01-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7074361/ /pubmed/31991694 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods9020126 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Hastie, Melindee
Ashman, Hollis
Torrico, Damir
Ha, Minh
Warner, Robyn
A Mixed Method Approach for the Investigation of Consumer Responses to Sheepmeat and Beef
title A Mixed Method Approach for the Investigation of Consumer Responses to Sheepmeat and Beef
title_full A Mixed Method Approach for the Investigation of Consumer Responses to Sheepmeat and Beef
title_fullStr A Mixed Method Approach for the Investigation of Consumer Responses to Sheepmeat and Beef
title_full_unstemmed A Mixed Method Approach for the Investigation of Consumer Responses to Sheepmeat and Beef
title_short A Mixed Method Approach for the Investigation of Consumer Responses to Sheepmeat and Beef
title_sort mixed method approach for the investigation of consumer responses to sheepmeat and beef
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7074361/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31991694
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods9020126
work_keys_str_mv AT hastiemelindee amixedmethodapproachfortheinvestigationofconsumerresponsestosheepmeatandbeef
AT ashmanhollis amixedmethodapproachfortheinvestigationofconsumerresponsestosheepmeatandbeef
AT torricodamir amixedmethodapproachfortheinvestigationofconsumerresponsestosheepmeatandbeef
AT haminh amixedmethodapproachfortheinvestigationofconsumerresponsestosheepmeatandbeef
AT warnerrobyn amixedmethodapproachfortheinvestigationofconsumerresponsestosheepmeatandbeef
AT hastiemelindee mixedmethodapproachfortheinvestigationofconsumerresponsestosheepmeatandbeef
AT ashmanhollis mixedmethodapproachfortheinvestigationofconsumerresponsestosheepmeatandbeef
AT torricodamir mixedmethodapproachfortheinvestigationofconsumerresponsestosheepmeatandbeef
AT haminh mixedmethodapproachfortheinvestigationofconsumerresponsestosheepmeatandbeef
AT warnerrobyn mixedmethodapproachfortheinvestigationofconsumerresponsestosheepmeatandbeef