Cargando…

Methylated PTGER4 is better than CA125, CEA, Cyfra211 and NSE as a therapeutic response assessment marker in stage IV lung cancer

Real-time assessment of therapeutic response in patients with advanced lung cancer presents a major challenge throughout the treatment process. Currently, computed tomography imaging is often used; however, it is radiation-based and hysteretic and is not suitable for repeated use as a real-time asse...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Yunxia, Huang, Jianfeng, Zou, Qinzhou, Che, Jun, Yang, Kaihua, Fan, Qiang, Qian, Danqi, Wu, Jia, Bao, Erwen, Song, Lele, Zhang, Fuzheng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: D.A. Spandidos 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7074558/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32256818
http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/ol.2020.11434
_version_ 1783506861153058816
author Zhang, Yunxia
Huang, Jianfeng
Zou, Qinzhou
Che, Jun
Yang, Kaihua
Fan, Qiang
Qian, Danqi
Wu, Jia
Bao, Erwen
Song, Lele
Zhang, Fuzheng
author_facet Zhang, Yunxia
Huang, Jianfeng
Zou, Qinzhou
Che, Jun
Yang, Kaihua
Fan, Qiang
Qian, Danqi
Wu, Jia
Bao, Erwen
Song, Lele
Zhang, Fuzheng
author_sort Zhang, Yunxia
collection PubMed
description Real-time assessment of therapeutic response in patients with advanced lung cancer presents a major challenge throughout the treatment process. Currently, computed tomography imaging is often used; however, it is radiation-based and hysteretic and is not suitable for repeated use as a real-time assessment. Blood biomarkers represent a novel solution for assessing therapeutic response in patients with advanced lung cancer. In the present study, the efficacy of a methylation marker [methylated prostaglandin E receptor 4 (mPTGER4)] and four protein markers [carcinoma antigen 125 (CA125), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cytokeratin 19-fragments (cyfra21-1) and neuron-specific enolase (NSE)] were simultaneously evaluated to determine their potential in facilitating therapeutic response monitoring as well as their prognostic values in patients with stage IV lung cancer. The results indicated that, following treatment, the blood levels of methylated PTGER4 and NSE had significantly decreased, and mPRGER4, CA125, CEA and NSE exhibited a significant decrease in percentage level. Since mPTGER4 exhibited a higher rate of positive detection prior to therapy, and a greater response of sensitivity to therapy compared to the protein markers, it may represent an improved marker for the monitoring of therapeutic response. The efficacy of the markers in predicting the overall survival (OS) rate of patients with stage IV lung cancer was also assessed. Results from the follow-up of patients (up to 891 days) revealed that the blood levels of mPTGER4, CA125 and NSE before treatment were able to predict overall survival (OS) rate. Additionally, the percentage change in expression levels of CA125, CEA and NSE was also able to predict the OS rate. In conclusion, the present results indicate that mPTGER4 represents an improved biomarker for monitoring therapeutic efficacy compared with CA125, CEA, Cyfra21-1 and NSE. In predicting the long-term survival of patients with stage IV lung cancer; however, the pre-treatment levels of mPTGER4, CA125 and NSE and the percentage changes of CA125, CEA and NSE may be used as the markers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7074558
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher D.A. Spandidos
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70745582020-03-31 Methylated PTGER4 is better than CA125, CEA, Cyfra211 and NSE as a therapeutic response assessment marker in stage IV lung cancer Zhang, Yunxia Huang, Jianfeng Zou, Qinzhou Che, Jun Yang, Kaihua Fan, Qiang Qian, Danqi Wu, Jia Bao, Erwen Song, Lele Zhang, Fuzheng Oncol Lett Articles Real-time assessment of therapeutic response in patients with advanced lung cancer presents a major challenge throughout the treatment process. Currently, computed tomography imaging is often used; however, it is radiation-based and hysteretic and is not suitable for repeated use as a real-time assessment. Blood biomarkers represent a novel solution for assessing therapeutic response in patients with advanced lung cancer. In the present study, the efficacy of a methylation marker [methylated prostaglandin E receptor 4 (mPTGER4)] and four protein markers [carcinoma antigen 125 (CA125), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cytokeratin 19-fragments (cyfra21-1) and neuron-specific enolase (NSE)] were simultaneously evaluated to determine their potential in facilitating therapeutic response monitoring as well as their prognostic values in patients with stage IV lung cancer. The results indicated that, following treatment, the blood levels of methylated PTGER4 and NSE had significantly decreased, and mPRGER4, CA125, CEA and NSE exhibited a significant decrease in percentage level. Since mPTGER4 exhibited a higher rate of positive detection prior to therapy, and a greater response of sensitivity to therapy compared to the protein markers, it may represent an improved marker for the monitoring of therapeutic response. The efficacy of the markers in predicting the overall survival (OS) rate of patients with stage IV lung cancer was also assessed. Results from the follow-up of patients (up to 891 days) revealed that the blood levels of mPTGER4, CA125 and NSE before treatment were able to predict overall survival (OS) rate. Additionally, the percentage change in expression levels of CA125, CEA and NSE was also able to predict the OS rate. In conclusion, the present results indicate that mPTGER4 represents an improved biomarker for monitoring therapeutic efficacy compared with CA125, CEA, Cyfra21-1 and NSE. In predicting the long-term survival of patients with stage IV lung cancer; however, the pre-treatment levels of mPTGER4, CA125 and NSE and the percentage changes of CA125, CEA and NSE may be used as the markers. D.A. Spandidos 2020-04 2020-03-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7074558/ /pubmed/32256818 http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/ol.2020.11434 Text en Copyright: © Zhang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Articles
Zhang, Yunxia
Huang, Jianfeng
Zou, Qinzhou
Che, Jun
Yang, Kaihua
Fan, Qiang
Qian, Danqi
Wu, Jia
Bao, Erwen
Song, Lele
Zhang, Fuzheng
Methylated PTGER4 is better than CA125, CEA, Cyfra211 and NSE as a therapeutic response assessment marker in stage IV lung cancer
title Methylated PTGER4 is better than CA125, CEA, Cyfra211 and NSE as a therapeutic response assessment marker in stage IV lung cancer
title_full Methylated PTGER4 is better than CA125, CEA, Cyfra211 and NSE as a therapeutic response assessment marker in stage IV lung cancer
title_fullStr Methylated PTGER4 is better than CA125, CEA, Cyfra211 and NSE as a therapeutic response assessment marker in stage IV lung cancer
title_full_unstemmed Methylated PTGER4 is better than CA125, CEA, Cyfra211 and NSE as a therapeutic response assessment marker in stage IV lung cancer
title_short Methylated PTGER4 is better than CA125, CEA, Cyfra211 and NSE as a therapeutic response assessment marker in stage IV lung cancer
title_sort methylated ptger4 is better than ca125, cea, cyfra211 and nse as a therapeutic response assessment marker in stage iv lung cancer
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7074558/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32256818
http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/ol.2020.11434
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangyunxia methylatedptger4isbetterthanca125ceacyfra211andnseasatherapeuticresponseassessmentmarkerinstageivlungcancer
AT huangjianfeng methylatedptger4isbetterthanca125ceacyfra211andnseasatherapeuticresponseassessmentmarkerinstageivlungcancer
AT zouqinzhou methylatedptger4isbetterthanca125ceacyfra211andnseasatherapeuticresponseassessmentmarkerinstageivlungcancer
AT chejun methylatedptger4isbetterthanca125ceacyfra211andnseasatherapeuticresponseassessmentmarkerinstageivlungcancer
AT yangkaihua methylatedptger4isbetterthanca125ceacyfra211andnseasatherapeuticresponseassessmentmarkerinstageivlungcancer
AT fanqiang methylatedptger4isbetterthanca125ceacyfra211andnseasatherapeuticresponseassessmentmarkerinstageivlungcancer
AT qiandanqi methylatedptger4isbetterthanca125ceacyfra211andnseasatherapeuticresponseassessmentmarkerinstageivlungcancer
AT wujia methylatedptger4isbetterthanca125ceacyfra211andnseasatherapeuticresponseassessmentmarkerinstageivlungcancer
AT baoerwen methylatedptger4isbetterthanca125ceacyfra211andnseasatherapeuticresponseassessmentmarkerinstageivlungcancer
AT songlele methylatedptger4isbetterthanca125ceacyfra211andnseasatherapeuticresponseassessmentmarkerinstageivlungcancer
AT zhangfuzheng methylatedptger4isbetterthanca125ceacyfra211andnseasatherapeuticresponseassessmentmarkerinstageivlungcancer