Cargando…

The Tool Life and Coating-Substrate Adhesion of AlCrSiN-Coated Carbide Cutting Tools Prepared by LARC with Respect to the Edge Preparation and Surface Finishing

Nanocomposite AlCrSiN hard coatings were deposited on the cemented carbide substrates with a negative substrate bias voltage within the range of −80 to −120 V using the cathodic arc evaporation system. The effect of variation in the bias voltage on the coating-substrate adhesion and nanohardness was...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vopát, Tomáš, Sahul, Martin, Haršáni, Marián, Vortel, Ondřej, Zlámal, Tomáš
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7074613/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32033411
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mi11020166
_version_ 1783506874105069568
author Vopát, Tomáš
Sahul, Martin
Haršáni, Marián
Vortel, Ondřej
Zlámal, Tomáš
author_facet Vopát, Tomáš
Sahul, Martin
Haršáni, Marián
Vortel, Ondřej
Zlámal, Tomáš
author_sort Vopát, Tomáš
collection PubMed
description Nanocomposite AlCrSiN hard coatings were deposited on the cemented carbide substrates with a negative substrate bias voltage within the range of −80 to −120 V using the cathodic arc evaporation system. The effect of variation in the bias voltage on the coating-substrate adhesion and nanohardness was investigated. It was clear that if bias voltage increased, nanohardness increased in the range from −80 V to −120 V. The coating deposited at the bias voltage of −120 V had the highest nanohardness (37.7 ± 1.5 GPa). The samples were prepared by brushing and wet microblasting to finish a surface and prepare the required cutting edge radii for the tool life cutting tests and the coating adhesion observation. The indents after the static Mercedes indentation test were studied by scanning the electron microscope to evaluate the coating-substrate adhesion. The longer time of edge preparation with surface finishing led to a slight deterioration in the adhesion strength of the coating to the substrate. The tool wear of cemented carbide turning inserts was studied on the turning centre during the tool life cutting test. The tested workpiece material was austenitic stainless steel. The cemented carbide turning inserts with larger cutting edge radius were worn out faster during the machining. Meanwhile, the tool life increased when the cutting edge radius was smaller.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7074613
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70746132020-03-20 The Tool Life and Coating-Substrate Adhesion of AlCrSiN-Coated Carbide Cutting Tools Prepared by LARC with Respect to the Edge Preparation and Surface Finishing Vopát, Tomáš Sahul, Martin Haršáni, Marián Vortel, Ondřej Zlámal, Tomáš Micromachines (Basel) Article Nanocomposite AlCrSiN hard coatings were deposited on the cemented carbide substrates with a negative substrate bias voltage within the range of −80 to −120 V using the cathodic arc evaporation system. The effect of variation in the bias voltage on the coating-substrate adhesion and nanohardness was investigated. It was clear that if bias voltage increased, nanohardness increased in the range from −80 V to −120 V. The coating deposited at the bias voltage of −120 V had the highest nanohardness (37.7 ± 1.5 GPa). The samples were prepared by brushing and wet microblasting to finish a surface and prepare the required cutting edge radii for the tool life cutting tests and the coating adhesion observation. The indents after the static Mercedes indentation test were studied by scanning the electron microscope to evaluate the coating-substrate adhesion. The longer time of edge preparation with surface finishing led to a slight deterioration in the adhesion strength of the coating to the substrate. The tool wear of cemented carbide turning inserts was studied on the turning centre during the tool life cutting test. The tested workpiece material was austenitic stainless steel. The cemented carbide turning inserts with larger cutting edge radius were worn out faster during the machining. Meanwhile, the tool life increased when the cutting edge radius was smaller. MDPI 2020-02-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7074613/ /pubmed/32033411 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mi11020166 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Vopát, Tomáš
Sahul, Martin
Haršáni, Marián
Vortel, Ondřej
Zlámal, Tomáš
The Tool Life and Coating-Substrate Adhesion of AlCrSiN-Coated Carbide Cutting Tools Prepared by LARC with Respect to the Edge Preparation and Surface Finishing
title The Tool Life and Coating-Substrate Adhesion of AlCrSiN-Coated Carbide Cutting Tools Prepared by LARC with Respect to the Edge Preparation and Surface Finishing
title_full The Tool Life and Coating-Substrate Adhesion of AlCrSiN-Coated Carbide Cutting Tools Prepared by LARC with Respect to the Edge Preparation and Surface Finishing
title_fullStr The Tool Life and Coating-Substrate Adhesion of AlCrSiN-Coated Carbide Cutting Tools Prepared by LARC with Respect to the Edge Preparation and Surface Finishing
title_full_unstemmed The Tool Life and Coating-Substrate Adhesion of AlCrSiN-Coated Carbide Cutting Tools Prepared by LARC with Respect to the Edge Preparation and Surface Finishing
title_short The Tool Life and Coating-Substrate Adhesion of AlCrSiN-Coated Carbide Cutting Tools Prepared by LARC with Respect to the Edge Preparation and Surface Finishing
title_sort tool life and coating-substrate adhesion of alcrsin-coated carbide cutting tools prepared by larc with respect to the edge preparation and surface finishing
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7074613/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32033411
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mi11020166
work_keys_str_mv AT vopattomas thetoollifeandcoatingsubstrateadhesionofalcrsincoatedcarbidecuttingtoolspreparedbylarcwithrespecttotheedgepreparationandsurfacefinishing
AT sahulmartin thetoollifeandcoatingsubstrateadhesionofalcrsincoatedcarbidecuttingtoolspreparedbylarcwithrespecttotheedgepreparationandsurfacefinishing
AT harsanimarian thetoollifeandcoatingsubstrateadhesionofalcrsincoatedcarbidecuttingtoolspreparedbylarcwithrespecttotheedgepreparationandsurfacefinishing
AT vortelondrej thetoollifeandcoatingsubstrateadhesionofalcrsincoatedcarbidecuttingtoolspreparedbylarcwithrespecttotheedgepreparationandsurfacefinishing
AT zlamaltomas thetoollifeandcoatingsubstrateadhesionofalcrsincoatedcarbidecuttingtoolspreparedbylarcwithrespecttotheedgepreparationandsurfacefinishing
AT vopattomas toollifeandcoatingsubstrateadhesionofalcrsincoatedcarbidecuttingtoolspreparedbylarcwithrespecttotheedgepreparationandsurfacefinishing
AT sahulmartin toollifeandcoatingsubstrateadhesionofalcrsincoatedcarbidecuttingtoolspreparedbylarcwithrespecttotheedgepreparationandsurfacefinishing
AT harsanimarian toollifeandcoatingsubstrateadhesionofalcrsincoatedcarbidecuttingtoolspreparedbylarcwithrespecttotheedgepreparationandsurfacefinishing
AT vortelondrej toollifeandcoatingsubstrateadhesionofalcrsincoatedcarbidecuttingtoolspreparedbylarcwithrespecttotheedgepreparationandsurfacefinishing
AT zlamaltomas toollifeandcoatingsubstrateadhesionofalcrsincoatedcarbidecuttingtoolspreparedbylarcwithrespecttotheedgepreparationandsurfacefinishing