Cargando…

Stereotactic body radiotherapy: No longer a special procedure?

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Gagneur, Justin D., Godley, Andrew, Rong, Yi
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:	Parallel Opposed Editorial
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7075374/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32176454 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12853

Ejemplares similares

MR‐linac is the best modality for lung SBRT
por: Godley, Andrew, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Three Discipline Collaborative Radiation Therapy (3DCRT) special debate: Radiation oncology has become so technologically complex that basic fundamental physics should no longer be included in the modern curriculum for radiation oncology residents
por: Beriwal, Sushil, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

We are ready for clinical implementation of Carbon Ion Radiotherapy in the United States
por: Beltran, Chris, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Are in‐house diagnostic MR physicists necessary for clinical implementation of MRI guided radiotherapy?
por: Cao, Minsong, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

FLASH instead of proton arc therapy is a more promising advancement for the next generation proton radiotherapy
por: Kang, Minglei, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Computer automation for physics chart check should be adopted in clinic to replace manual chart checking for radiotherapy
por: Clouser, Edward L., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Physicists should perform reference planning for CBCT guided online adaptive radiotherapy
por: Lin, Mu‐Han, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

3D printing technology will eventually eliminate the need of purchasing commercial phantoms for clinical medical physics QA procedures
por: Ehler, Eric, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Future mainstream platform for online adaptive radiotherapy will be using on‐board MR rather than on‐board (CB) CT images
por: Hyer, Daniel E., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Three discipline collaborative radiation therapy (3DCRT) special debate: FLASH radiotherapy needs ongoing basic and animal research before implementing it to a large clinical scale
por: Guerrieri, Patrizia, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Three Discipline Collaborative Radiation Therapy (3DCRT) special debate: In the future, at least 20% of NIH funding for radiotherapy research should be allocated to non‐oncologic applications
por: Howell, Krisha, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Parallel/Opposed: IMRT QA using treatment log files is superior to conventional measurement‐based method
por: Childress, Nathan, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Three discipline collaborative radiation therapy (3DCRT) special debate: The United States should build additional proton therapy facilities
por: Braunstein, Steve, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Three discipline collaborative radiation therapy special debate: All head and neck cancer patients with intact tumors/nodes should have scheduled adaptive replanning performed at least once during the course of radiotherapy
por: Soisson, Emilie, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Extensive upfront validation and testing are needed prior to the clinical implementation of AI‐based auto‐segmentation tools
por: Roper, Justin, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Three discipline collaborative radiation therapy (3DCRT) special debate: The single most important factor in determining the future of SBRT is immune response
por: Grassberger, Clemens, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Three discipline collaborative radiation therapy (3DCRT) special debate: Equipment development is stifling innovation in radiation oncology
por: Kim, Leonard, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Three discipline collaborative radiation therapy (3DCRT) special debate: We should treat all cancer patients with hypofractionation
por: Green, Michael, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Three Discipline Collaborative Radiation Therapy (3DCRT) Special Debate: I would treat prostate cancer with proton therapy
por: Carrier, France, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Three discipline collaborative radiation therapy (3DCRT) special debate: The United States needs at least one carbon ion facility
por: Blakely, Eleanor A, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Three discipline collaborative radiation therapy (3DCRT) special debate: I would treat all early‐stage NSCLC patients with SBRT
por: Mohindra, Pranshu, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Three discipline collaborative radiation therapy (3DCRT) special debate: A physicist's time is better spent in direct patient/provider interaction than in the patient's chart
por: Atwood, Todd F., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Creating a treatment plan report should be mandated as a minimum standard practice for patient care and QA documentation
por: Xia, Ping, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

A standardized checklist is optimal for patients’ chart check
por: Kim, Leonard, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Vendor‐provided clinical physics services are a disservice to patients and the medical physics profession
por: Wang, Dongxu, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Three discipline collaborative radiation therapy (3DCRT) special debate: Peer review in radiation oncology is more effective today than 20 years ago
por: Ahmad, Anis, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

CAMPEP graduate program standards should require a dedicated course in Magnetic Resonance Imaging physics
por: Jordan, David W., et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Proton therapy needs further technological development to fulfill the promise of becoming a superior treatment modality (compared to photon therapy)
por: Hyer, Daniel E., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Maximizing the cost benefit of physics residency interview
por: Adamson, Justus, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

The more IGRT systems, the merrier?
por: Sun, Baozhou, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Artificial intelligence will reduce the need for clinical medical physicists
por: Tang, Xiaoli, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Clinical practice workflow in Radiation Oncology should be highly standardized
por: Halvorsen, Per, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Expanding the reach of medical physics: Immunotherapy should be included as part of the curriculum for medical physics education and training
por: Lamichhane, Narottam, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Radiation oncology alternative payment model to medical physics profession: More benefits than detriments
por: Pawlicki, Todd, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

4DCT is long overdue for improvement
por: Tryggestad, Erik, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Current status of Radiomics for cancer management: Challenges versus opportunities for clinical practice
por: Li, Hua, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Parallel/Opposed Editorial: DMP/residency programs are more sustainable than MPAs for the future of the medical physics profession
por: Shi, Chengyu, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

MBA degree is needed for leadership roles in Medical Physics profession
por: Gutierrez, Alonso N., et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Artificial intelligence can overcome challenges in brachytherapy treatment planning
por: Jia, Xun, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Globalism versus Nationalism in Medical Physics
por: Dube, Scott, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_2k3apintiabd9spg13i99e994b