Cargando…

Method of determining geometric patient size surrogates using localizer images in CT

PURPOSE: Size‐specific dose estimates (SSDE) requires accurate estimates of patient size surrogates. AAPM Report 204 shows that the SSDE is the product of CTDIvol and a scaling factor, the normalized dose coefficient (NDC) which depends on patient size surrogates for CT axial images. However, SSDE c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Burton, Christiane S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7075380/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31990136
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12814
_version_ 1783507030170927104
author Burton, Christiane S.
author_facet Burton, Christiane S.
author_sort Burton, Christiane S.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Size‐specific dose estimates (SSDE) requires accurate estimates of patient size surrogates. AAPM Report 204 shows that the SSDE is the product of CTDIvol and a scaling factor, the normalized dose coefficient (NDC) which depends on patient size surrogates for CT axial images. However, SSDE can be determined from CT localizer prior to CT scanning. AAPM Report 220 charges that a magnification correction is needed for geometric patient size‐surrogates. In this study, we demonstrate a novel “model‐based” magnification correction on patient data. METHODS: 573 patient scans obtained from a clinical CT system including 229 adult abdomen, 284 adult chest, 48 pediatric abdomen, and 12 pediatric chest exams. LAT and AP dimensions were extracted from CT localizers using a threshold extraction method (the ACR DIR). The model‐based magnification correction was applied to the AP and LAT dimensions extracted using the ACR DIR. NDC was calculated using the effective diameter for the ACR DIR only, the model‐based localizer‐based and axial‐based approaches. The LAT and AP dimensions were extracted from the “gold” standard CT axial scans. Outliers are defined as points outside the 95% confidence intervals and were analyzed. RESULTS: NDC estimates for the localizer‐based model‐based approach had an excellent correlation (R(2) = 0.92) with the gold standard approach. The effective diameter for ACR DIR and model‐based approaches are 8.0% and 1.0% greater than the gold standard respectively. Outliers were determined to be primarily patient truncation, with arms down or with devices. ACR DIR size extraction method fails for bariatric patients where the threshold is too high and some of their anatomy was included in the CT couch, and small patients due to the CT couch being included in the size measurement. CONCLUSION: The model‐based magnification method gives an accurate estimate of patient size surrogates extracted from CT localizers that are needed for calculating NDC to achieve accurate SSDE.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7075380
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70753802020-03-17 Method of determining geometric patient size surrogates using localizer images in CT Burton, Christiane S. J Appl Clin Med Phys Medical Imaging PURPOSE: Size‐specific dose estimates (SSDE) requires accurate estimates of patient size surrogates. AAPM Report 204 shows that the SSDE is the product of CTDIvol and a scaling factor, the normalized dose coefficient (NDC) which depends on patient size surrogates for CT axial images. However, SSDE can be determined from CT localizer prior to CT scanning. AAPM Report 220 charges that a magnification correction is needed for geometric patient size‐surrogates. In this study, we demonstrate a novel “model‐based” magnification correction on patient data. METHODS: 573 patient scans obtained from a clinical CT system including 229 adult abdomen, 284 adult chest, 48 pediatric abdomen, and 12 pediatric chest exams. LAT and AP dimensions were extracted from CT localizers using a threshold extraction method (the ACR DIR). The model‐based magnification correction was applied to the AP and LAT dimensions extracted using the ACR DIR. NDC was calculated using the effective diameter for the ACR DIR only, the model‐based localizer‐based and axial‐based approaches. The LAT and AP dimensions were extracted from the “gold” standard CT axial scans. Outliers are defined as points outside the 95% confidence intervals and were analyzed. RESULTS: NDC estimates for the localizer‐based model‐based approach had an excellent correlation (R(2) = 0.92) with the gold standard approach. The effective diameter for ACR DIR and model‐based approaches are 8.0% and 1.0% greater than the gold standard respectively. Outliers were determined to be primarily patient truncation, with arms down or with devices. ACR DIR size extraction method fails for bariatric patients where the threshold is too high and some of their anatomy was included in the CT couch, and small patients due to the CT couch being included in the size measurement. CONCLUSION: The model‐based magnification method gives an accurate estimate of patient size surrogates extracted from CT localizers that are needed for calculating NDC to achieve accurate SSDE. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-01-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7075380/ /pubmed/31990136 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12814 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Medical Imaging
Burton, Christiane S.
Method of determining geometric patient size surrogates using localizer images in CT
title Method of determining geometric patient size surrogates using localizer images in CT
title_full Method of determining geometric patient size surrogates using localizer images in CT
title_fullStr Method of determining geometric patient size surrogates using localizer images in CT
title_full_unstemmed Method of determining geometric patient size surrogates using localizer images in CT
title_short Method of determining geometric patient size surrogates using localizer images in CT
title_sort method of determining geometric patient size surrogates using localizer images in ct
topic Medical Imaging
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7075380/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31990136
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12814
work_keys_str_mv AT burtonchristianes methodofdetermininggeometricpatientsizesurrogatesusinglocalizerimagesinct